aspirant
aspirant's JournalDictatorship dems
If we want to scourge the cancer, we have to call it cancer.
We have one corporate party with 2 names giving it almost supreme authority over the state.
To bust this up you have to get the people repulsed or adverse to even the sound of their mere existence while positively promoting our principles. Working both sides is the fastest way.
Calling them Third Wayers is milky toast at best. The focus is to reach low-information voters who don't know what Third Way is or means. Low-information , by its nature, means their not going to research it but if we associate it with Dictatorship, they know what that is.
If we learned anything from the repubs it is wordsmithing is vital, especially with this corrupt media.
Next step, making the word corporations smell and taste rancid.
Remember ole Georgie Bush's quote,"If this were a dictatorship it would be a heck of a lot easier...as long as I'm the dictator, Hehehe."
Can IgnoreUs trade authority voters be changed to IncludeUs trade authority voters
IMO overcoming this devastating procedure would entail changing Obama's stance and/or securing the necessary "NO" votes to send it into forgotten land.
The "NO" votes
!) Changing the IgnoreUS-Track dems to the IncludeUs-track dems won't be easy.
Remember the Obama/Dimon team working their undisclosed magic.
2)Changing the repub "Yes" votes to "No" may be a little easier.
a)Taking away Congresses constitutionally granted powers, the identical approach to dems,
could have an impact.
b)If we "TRULY" want to stop this, we mustn't ignore the anti-Obama sentiment that exists
with the repubs. How we cultivate this into enough "No" votes w/o offending some dems
will be tricky.
Changing Obama's stance
1) If anyone has any suggestions beyond a petition campaign, I would love to hear them.
Terminology
Would IgnoreUs - EmbraceUs or ExcludeUs - IncludeUs be more effective?
Can the IgnoreUs-Track trade authority voters be changed to IncludeUs-Track voters?
IMO overcoming this devastating procedure would entail changing Obama's stance and/or securing the necessary "NO" votes to send it into forgotten land.
The "NO" votes
!) Changing the IgnoreUS-Track dems to the IncludeUs-track dems won't be easy.
Remember the Obama/Dimon team working their undisclosed magic.
2)Changing the repub "Yes" votes to "No" may be a little easier.
a)Taking away Congresses constitutionally granted powers, the identical approach to dems,
could have an impact.
b)If we "TRULY" want to stop this, we mustn't ignore the anti-Obama sentiment that exists
with the repubs. How we cultivate this into enough "No" votes w/o offending some dems
will be tricky.
Changing Obama's stance
1) If anyone has any suggestions beyond a petition campaign, I would love to hear them.
Terminology
Would IgnoreUs - EmbraceUs or ExcludeUs - IncludeUs be more effective?
How can anyone reform the democratic party
if populist principles aren't fought for.
The secrecy of TPP and all stated opposition on this group's postings are a clear indication of a non-populist trade deal.
Obama publicly supports this deal and is avidly fighting for its passage.
So how do we fight back?
Where are the lines drawn on Obama criticism, since he is working against us on this matter.
Do we casually criticize and watch as Obama, Dimon and the corporate team sweep to victory.
Or do we fight with everything we got because they sure aren't playing nice on the other side.
Please inform me of the subjective line of when it is Obama bashing and when it is not?
This is a discussion post and I would like to know what tools we have and can use that aren't Obama bashing
If the ObamaSecret deal is passed,
can the people expect less transparency going forward? Fast track insures the corporate dictatorships input is pasted into this bill for its duration. Please call your reps and ask if they support this OBAMASECRET deal.
Do you think if they can get away with these they won't be shy to try and legislate Fast Track (or probably a different name) into other bills?
Are today's global corporations dictatorships?
Global corporations are too big to jail, too big to fail
Global corporations have their own judicial systems (investor-state tribunals)
Global corporations own politicians and write their own laws
Global corporations are pursuing "Free Markets" with no regulations or restrictions
"Free Markets = "Lawless Markets"
Global corporations are now people, only when they choose to be (murder convictions)
AND THE BEAT GOES ON
How about this populist plan
Let's urge Bernie to run as a Dem into the primary and if he sees he will lose. then switch to the Green's or run as an Independent spoiler. When HRC comes with hat in hand asking Bernie to drop out knowing she can't win with a split Dem base, then let Bernie put forth his demands.
He wants total control of DNC, DSCC, DCCC funds and he will run only Populist/Progressive candidates of his choice in all house and senate races. Any right-wing dem incumbents who won't fit in will be forced to retire and he will put together his 50-state strategy
We must find our places of power and exploit them. The Nadar spoiler role is still fresh in the minds of party leadership.
I know this is all premised on how much the PTB want HRC as President because a repub will do just as well for them. The more we can expose this corporate dem corruption, the more Populist votes we can amass.
Profile Information
Member since: Wed Nov 5, 2014, 11:47 PMNumber of posts: 3,533
