guillaumeb
guillaumeb's JournalWill Trump nominate Bill Cosby to a Cabinet level post?
They do seem to have some behavioral commonalities.
BOOK REVIEW: American Islamophobia Language of The Oppressed
From the article:
To read more:
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/nbamuslims/2018/04/22/book-review-american-islamophobia-language-of-the-oppressed/?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Muslim&utm_content=49
What Interfaith Means to Me
From the article:
I would extend that unity to all, not just believers.
To read more:
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/mostlymuslim/2018/04/interfaith-means-muslim/?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Muslim&utm_content=49
Good news: Germans don skullcaps to protest anti-Semitism
From the article:
And:
To read more:
https://religionnews.com/2018/04/25/germans-don-skullcaps-to-protest-anti-semitism/
Pie in the sky and unworkable plans.
Bernie Sanders has proposed free college, and single payer, and many other things. A typical response to these and other progressive ideas is that what is proposed is pie in the sky, or unworkable, or the American people will never accept that.
What follows is a short list of what were once unacceptable ideas that are now acceptable.
Women voting.
Black people voting.
Young children not working.
The 8 hour day.
Vacations for workers.
Retirement for workers instead of dying on the job.
Schooling for workers.
Women rnuning for political office.
I could continue, but the point is that the right has been framing the narrative for 50 years, telling us all what is workable and what is unrealistic.
What is unworkable is cautious tinkering with a broken system.
What is unworkable is spending a trillion dollars a year on the war budget while the infrastructure decays.
What is unworkable is millions with little or no access to healthcare while the insurance industries are making record profits.
What is unworkable is constantly cutting taxes on the rich and telling the bottom 90% to make do with less.
We need a new definition for unworkable the reflects the reality of life in the US in 2018.
Embracing 'the Sort of Bold Thinking We Need,' Sanders to Introduce Plan:
From the article:
With the goal of eliminating "working poverty and involuntary unemployment," driving up wages, and curtailing income inequality, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) is reportedly planning to introduce a federal jobs guarantee that would provide decent-paying employment to every American "who wants or needs" it.
To read more:
https://www.commondreams.org/news/2018/04/23/embracing-sort-bold-thinking-we-need-sanders-introduce-plan-guarantee-every-american?
The Democrats need a bold agenda. This is one part of a bold agenda.
Being anti-Trump is intuitive, but there is a need for solutions as well. When FDR rolled out his plans, the GOP opposed everything as unworkable and unrealistic. But the New Deal ushered in an era of remarkable prosperity that only stopped when Reagan started the roll back of the New Deal.
Hate crimes against American Muslims up 15%, says CAIR
From the article:
To read more:
https://www.ocregister.com/2018/04/23/cair-report-shows-15-percent-increase-in-hate-crimes-against-american-muslims-nationwide/
Redefining religious freedom as religious privilege
from the article:
The Senate bill is not the bulwark its name suggests but the latest salvo in the ongoing attempt to redefine religious freedom as religious privilege. It does nothing to defend the First Amendment; in fact, it violates it.....
It might seem odd for a constitutional attorney to point out that, other than the freedom of thought, all our rights can and should be curtailed in certain circumstances. But its true. Even the free exercise of religion can be limited. Look closely at the language and the amendment makes this clear. The free exercise clause prevents the government from prohibiting the free exercise of religion; it does not prevent the government from regulating conduct that might be religiously motivated.
And this, in my view, is the crux of the argument:
To read more:
https://religionnews.com/2018/04/23/redefining-religious-freedom-as-religious-privilege/
Reconciling faith and science.
In my view, it is quite easy to reconcile faith and science. Both involve a search for answers. Answers to different questions, to be sure, but a search all the same.
This fragment from a longer article describes on such method of reconciliation:
A) His conception of the relationship of science and faith was rather circumspect, carefully delineating their roles as ways of knowing. Science for him was the methodology for understanding the physical cosmos; revealed religion taught truths important for salvation. He was quite content to observe that the findings of science were in no way discordant with scriptural revelation, and vice versa, but neither should overreach. If Lemaître has a lesson for the science-faith discourse today, that would probably be it.
https://www.americamagazine.org/content/all-things/faith-and-science-georges-lemaitre-11-questions-dr-karl-van-bibber
Many of us recognize this as the NOMA solution, the idea that the 2 fields are non-overlapping, each with its own methods.
I would also say, as my personal opinion, that each involves a search for truth, and in that search for truth, each can lead to the Creator.
I do not mean to imply that any, or all, or most scientists are inevitably led to an awareness of the Creator, but that the Creator, as the one who figuratively lit the spark of creation that was the Big Bang, inevitably values knowledge and any expression of the sentience that is referred to in the phrase from Genesis, 1:27, where it is said that the Creator "created mankind in the image and likeness".
So to my mind, seeking knowledge is growing closer to the Creator.
Good news: Black networks farm-to-church movement brings fresh food to Baltimore
From the article:
To read more:
https://religionnews.com/2018/04/20/black-networks-farm-to-church-movement-brings-fresh-food-to-baltimore/
Profile Information
Member since: Mon Jan 26, 2015, 06:15 PMNumber of posts: 42,641