Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sahel

sahel's Journal
sahel's Journal
November 23, 2015

On this day in Germany, 1946 (Hitler, the SPD and the German Democrats)



This is a rally of the German Democratic Socialists (Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands or SPD) in Munich. The man speaking is Kurt Schumacher, trying to will his party to a victory in the Bavarian State Elections in 1946. This photo was taken little more than a year after his release from the Neungamme Concentration Camp, having been brought to the point of death during more than a decade of torture and beatings during his political imprisonment on Hitler's orders from 1932 to 1945. Despite his ill-treatment, he never broke, and never collaborated with the Nazi regime.



In 1933, when the Nazis moved to pass the Enabling Act that would give Hitler absolute power as dictator, Schumacher and the democratic socialists mounted a last-ditch defence of German democracy. They first tried to boycott the session in order to deny the Nazis a quorum, but Hermann Goering changed the rules of the Reichstag so that anyone who was absent would be deemed to have voted in favour of the Act. This meant that Hitler could help secure passage of the Enabling Act simply by having his political opponents arrested. By the time of the vote, all of the communists and over 20 socialist Reichstag deputies were already imprisoned in Hitler's camps.

The SPD then desperately attempted to engage other opposition parties to vote against the Enabling Act. None would join them. Not even the liberal German Democrats (whose support base was largely Jewish) could be persuaded to oppose Hitler in the face of Nazi intimidation. Hitler himself expected this, in fact he had predicted that the urbane, middle-class liberals, in the end, would always choose comfort and personal security over principle. Ultimately the German Democrats joined with the conservatives and fascists in passing the Enabling Act. To save Hitler the inconvenience of banning them and to ensure their ability to quietly retire to the countryside, the Democrats then voluntarily dissolved themselves.

Hitler subsequently banned the SPD. Its leaders either fled or were sent to the camps. Some, like Rudolf Breitscheid, would die there, shot in the night by Hitler's secret police and their deaths passed off as due to allied bombing raids. Only Schumacher survived as the sole German leader to have neither fled nor collaborated with the Nazis.

As such, he was widely expected to be successful in leading West Germany after the war's end. But the United States as occupying power remained opposed to any socialist government, and soon set about undermining him as a red and a traitor together with the centrists and moderates who had now emerged from their country villas. Schumacher was defeated in the 1946 elections by Konrad Adenauer, a Centrist that had voted for Hitler as dictator and about whom Hitler had often spoken admiringly.

Schumacher's health finally failed and he died in 1952. The liberal and centrist quislings that had failed Germany in its time of need obligingly sent flowers, before writing poison-pen obituaries praising his courage, but criticising his obstinacy and refusal to compromise. That of course was precisely why his socialist comrades loved him. He never compromised, unlike most of his detractors, who compromised altogether too readily.

November 8, 2015

Black Lives Matter and The Failure to Build a Movement

This is a good piece by Douglas Williams, a labor organizer and doctoral student at Wayne State University. Its a couple of months old now and a bit dated, but still worth a read. The excerpts dont really do it justice but here goes:-

This quote from one of the protestors is stupefying. “‘Bernie, you were confronted at NetRoots at by black women,’ (Marissa) Johnson said before adding, ‘you have yet to put out a criminal justice reform package like O’Malley did.'” Just in case you were wondering, that would be Martin O’Malley, the former mayor of Baltimore who put in place much of the aggressive policing tactics that resulted in the death of Freddie Gray on April 12th. The candidate who has stood at the forefront of civil rights advocacy for over fifty years is now being told by Black Lives Matter activists (and liberal columnists) that he needs to be more like, you know, the guy who gave thousands of Black men across his city arrest records for the ridiculously minor legal transgressions. It is a perfect example of the triumph of form over substance in politics.

The notion that these activists are putting anything on the line with these protests is hilarious. You have to chuckle a bit at the notion that these activists are putting their lives on the line….at a rally for expanding Social Security and Medicaid in Seattle. Perhaps they feared the septuagenarians tossing their fair trade Starbucks at them on stage? In any case, whenever the “hooriding” on Republicans commences, please let the rest of us know. Hell, I would be happy with them simply “hooriding” on Hillary Clinton, but we hear that doing so might require actual work, so maybe we will not see that, either. If these folks can’t pull together a coherent, disruptive protest against Hillary Clinton in the way that climate activists just did, how is there any chance of them successfully challenging police violence?

http://www.commondreams.org/views/2015/08/10/black-lives-matter-and-failure-build-movement

Profile Information

Member since: Wed Oct 28, 2015, 08:54 PM
Number of posts: 87
Latest Discussions»sahel's Journal