is going to backfire. The Clinton campaign is tone deaf if it goes down that road. Not credible.

what about Bernie and defense interests?

He's a trusted member of the veterans committee and I don't see him identifying the DOD as wasteful.

why weren't the security people around her at the time raising questions about the e-mail server? Even if she arguably committed technical crimes, is there political motivation for the timing of the allegations?

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/mar/30/bernie-sanders-left-dc-primary-ballot-after-democr/

That can continually surround and provoke a targeted person, even to the point of impersonating the the person's own lawyers, Congress and civil rights advocacy organizations when he seeks relief?

is that most of them are elected or party officials who rely on donor connections tight with the Clintons.

wouldn't you be tempted to switch to the candidate with the momentum and supporter enthusiasm, who wins in purple states instead of just the deep south?

like or dislike his positions, agree or disagree about how effectively he could govern, he's demonstrably genuine.

I think Trump attacking Bernie would ricochet back at him.

Hillary could deflect some of it because she's a woman, but it wouldn't take long for some serious two-way mudslinging.

usually demoralizes supporters of the trailing candidate, but in this case it may be leading Hillary's supporters to think it doesn't matter if they turn out.

to make it look like Hillary is way out front, rather than pledged delegates where she has a modest lead?