intrepidity
intrepidity's JournalHow the Chinese Govt Fabricates Social Media Posts for Strategic Distraction, not Engaged Argument
https://gking.harvard.edu/50CGary King, Jennifer Pan, and Margaret E. Roberts. 2017. How the Chinese Government Fabricates Social Media Posts for Strategic Distraction, not Engaged Argument. American Political Science Review, 111, 3, Pp. 484-501.
The Covid dissidents taking on China
https://unherd.com/2021/04/the-covid-dissidents-taking-on-china/The Chinese-controlled results sparked global accusations of a whitewash and further corroded confidence in the WHO. Few experts give much credibility to claims the pandemic was imported on a packet of chilled pork or slab of frozen pangolin sold at a market. And demands are growing for the leak hypothesis to be taken more seriously. Wuhan, after all, is the major research centre for bat coronaviruses in Asia, where there are secretive labs, known biosafety concerns and high-risk experiments being conducted.
It has now emerged that Feng, deputy head of Chinas Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and an expert on emergency health responses, performed an even more sinister role as the pandemic played out. He was one of four names copied on a CDC memo sent out in February 2020 ordering Chinas scientists not to share any data, documents or specimens relating to the epidemic and to prioritise the interests of the country. The memo warned that anyone violating the request would be dealt with severely in accordance with discipline, laws and regulations a threat to be taken seriously in a country ruled by fear.
Much, much more at link above.
Trevor Bedford thread about Covid variants (Tw)
My question: what is the significance of the quiescent 10 months? Is that typical?
https://twitter.com/trvrb/status/1349774271095062528
FBI #107-AFO: Do you know this guy? (Tw)
https://twitter.com/SeditionHunters/status/1382081731835129857Meet the Censored: The U.S. Right to Know
This story is about how, after a Google algorithm update, the website of U.S. Right to Know (USRTK) experienced a 60% drop in traffic--for no discernable reason--and how they were left scrambling to try to guess the reason. Was it due to the controversial nature of their content? Or was it just typical search engine optimization (SEO) issues?
https://taibbi.substack.com/p/meet-the-censored-the-us-right-to?r=ep9dv&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&utm_source=copy
Moreover, agencies like USRTK are particularly vulnerable in the age of algorithmic moderation, as computers dont easily distinguish between conspiracy theory and legitimate reporting that runs counter to present accepted narratives. Any organization that swims in those waters and isnt attached to a big name now has to keep looking over its shoulder. If such an organization does end up suspended, deleted, or de-ranked, as USRTK later would be, it has to wonder: was it something we wrote?
(snip)
U.S. Right to Know is basically ad-free. It doesnt aggregate, but instead publishes original reporting based mainly on public documents. Its the opposite of a click-chasing SEO-oriented site that is attempting to guess what might rank well. It doesnt have shocking or sensational headlines in fact, it barely had an engagement strategy. Its work is referenced by peer-reviewed medical journals and established outlets like the New York Times.
More at link above.
Nature: SARS-CoV-2 evolution during treatment of chronic infection
Well this is a cautionary tale, if not completely expected. Variants/mutants have a selective advantage while under pressure from treatment with convalescent plasma.
SARS-CoV-2 evolution during treatment of chronic infection
Abstract
The spike protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is critical for virus infection through the engagement of the human ACE2 protein1 and is a major antibody target. Here we show that chronic infection with SARS-CoV-2 leads to viral evolution and reduced sensitivity to neutralizing antibodies in an immunosuppressed individual treated with convalescent plasma, by generating whole-genome ultra-deep sequences for 23 time points that span 101 days and using in vitro techniques to characterize the mutations revealed by sequencing. There was little change in the overall structure of the viral population after two courses of remdesivir during the first 57 days. However, after convalescent plasma therapy, we observed large, dynamic shifts in the viral population, with the emergence of a dominant viral strain that contained a substitution (D796H) in the S2 subunit and a deletion (?H69/?V70) in the S1 N-terminal domain of the spike protein. As passively transferred serum antibodies diminished, viruses with the escape genotype were reduced in frequency, before returning during a final, unsuccessful course of convalescent plasma treatment. In vitro, the spike double mutant bearing both ?H69/?V70 and D796H conferred modestly decreased sensitivity to convalescent plasma, while maintaining infectivity levels that were similar to the wild-type virus.The spike substitution mutant D796H appeared to be the main contributor to the decreased susceptibility to neutralizing antibodies, but this mutation resulted in an infectivity defect. The spike deletion mutant ?H69/?V70 had a twofold higher level of infectivity than wild-type SARS-CoV-2, possibly compensating for the reduced infectivity of the D796H mutation. These data reveal strong selection on SARS-CoV-2 during convalescent plasma therapy, which is associated with the emergence of viral variants that show evidence of reduced susceptibility to neutralizing antibodies in immunosuppressed individuals.
Tracking variants: covidcg.org (Tw)
https://twitter.com/Ayjchan/status/1381401385170825223https://twitter.com/Ayjchan/status/1381413095277539328
Much more in this Twitter thread:
https://mobile.twitter.com/Ayjchan/status/1381403265607331843
Nature: After the WHO report: what's next in the search for COVID's origins
The priority should be to follow the animals, starting at the Huanan market, says Eddie Holmes, a virologist at the University of Sydney in Australia. Given the large number of animal species that SARS-CoV-2 can infect, that sampling should be as expansive as possible, say researchers.
And it should definitely include bats. The closest known relative of SARS-CoV-2 is a bat coronavirus called RaTG13, isolated from a bat in a mine in Mojiang, southern China. But it shares only 96% of its genome with SARS-CoV-2, meaning that it is only distantly related. Courtier says that more bats should be sampled from that mine, and that researchers should share the sequences of other coronaviruses isolated there.
But Linfa Wang, a virologist at DukeNational University of Singapore Medical School, doubts whether closer relatives will be found, given the exhaustive sampling done in the cave by researchers over the past decade. If you gave me a billion dollars, I would not sample in Mojiang cave. I would sample in Southeast Asia, adds Wang, who says that sampling should extend to lesser-sampled regions such as Thailand and Cambodia, where other relatives of SARS-CoV-2 have recently been isolated.
More: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00877-4
So my question is: how much do we risk by ramping up the search for the animal that gave us Covid19?
The mineshaft in Mojiang should probably be permanently sealed and/or decontaminated. It seems that authorities are currently not allowing anyone to visit.
I understand the scientific curiosity, and even the need to study and understand the potential threats, but at what point does it become counterproductive?
I am very torn on this matter.
Profile Information
Member since: Sun Feb 14, 2016, 07:36 PMNumber of posts: 7,288