Donald Trump’s biographers fear the Republican presidential nominee will take the United States to a very dark place out of spite as his campaign sinks into the abyss.

Politico convened a meeting of the real estate developer and former reality TV star’s five biographers to ask them about the latest scandal engulfing Trump’s presidential campaign, which is sinking fast with less than four weeks until the Nov. 8 election.

The biographers said the Trump captured on a 2005 hot mic recording was the same man — albeit even worse — they came to know in hours and hours of interviews and other research.

“I would have to say that ‘grabbing by the pussy’ was a little surprising to me,” said Wayne Barrett, author of the 1991 book “Trump.” “You know, thrusting his tongue down whatever mouth was available wasn’t much of a surprise, but ‘grabbing by the pussy’ was not something I had anticipated.”

They agreed that Trump was controlled by his ego and his impulses, although they found he had less interest in sex than he wants others to believe.

“This is almost nothing to do with lust,” Barrett said. “This is subjugation.”

The biographers were deeply concerned about Trump and the threat he poses to America’s democratic institutions in the next few weeks — and potentially for the foreseeable future.

“He’s really destroyed a sense of decency or boundaries or civic behavior in the course of this election that involved almost polluting everything he’s touched in this process,” said Timothy O’Brien, author of the 2005 book, “TrumpNation: The Art of Being the Donald.”

Trump will likely try to destroy the Republican Party that nominated him, along with the Democratic rival who’s likely to defeat him and Americans’ confidence in the electoral process, in the next several weeks, O’Brien said.

“I think he is just going to wage a scorch‑the‑earth campaign for the next three weeks, and if he loses, which I think he’s going to — I think he’s going to lose badly — he’s then going to come up with a scenario in which it was stolen from him, that the election was rigged, because he’s survived by creating alternate realities,” O’Brien said. “He’ll never say to himself he lost because he had a skeletal campaign operation, which he did; that he lost because he’s unappealing to a large swatch of the voters; that he lost because he’s willfully ignorant about public policy; that he lost because he’s a nasty and unappealing bigot. He’ll never, ever acknowledge any of that. He’ll just come up with an alternate reality that said, ‘It was rigged against me.'”

The biographers said the same personality flaws that doomed his campaign to failure are the same traits that could convince a man with such deep problems to seek the White House in the first place or force himself on women believing they desired him.

Continues... http://www.rawstory.com/2016/10/biographers-warn-trump-is-about-to-get-even-more-racist-as-his-campaign-sinks-into-the-dustbin-of-history/

At one point during the second presidential debate between accused serial molester Donald Trump and former secretary of state Hillary Clinton, the sniffing, lurking GOP nominee whined to anyone listening, “One on three!” The lament of an unapologetic bully who was somehow shocked by the fact that his opponent and both moderators weren’t kissing his ass like his closest advisers and fanboys do.

It surely wasn’t Trump’s most egregious trespass of the evening, but it was so perfectly illustrative of his entitled, infantile, schoolyard bully attitude. Trump is so blinded by the sycophantic fluffing of his most loyal fanboys, the notion of a debate setting in which, yes, both candidates faced the scrutiny of an opponent and two moderators seemed unfair and foreign to him.

So, he invoked a phrase we’ve all heard as kids at recess or from our own children: “One on three!” He might as well have collapsed to the floor, screaming at moderators Anderson Cooper and Martha Raddatz, “You can’t triple stamp a double stamp! You can’t triple stamp a double stamp!”

Despite this and other disqualifying events during and before the debate, the political press on cable news seemed to bend over backward to shoehorn Trump into the “win” category. Conversely, it’s obvious that if Clinton had responded by complaining, “Anti-quitsies, no anti-quitsies, no startsies!” the same talkers would have absolutely declared it a major fail by the frontrunner.

Specifically, it was the alleged liberal cable network MSNBC and its team of wise men, Chuck Todd, Joe Scarborough, Brian Williams and Chris Matthews, who couldn’t wait to tap into the “Trump comeback” narrative by praising Trump for a performance that the rest of us observed as the creepiest, most sniffle-punctuated and, in places, Third World presidential debate appearance in at least a century.

MORE: http://www.salon.com/2016/10/10/bizarro-world-the-debate-showed-us-the-real-liberal-media-bias-for-donald-trump/