HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » ProgRocknProgPol » Journal
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next »

ProgRocknProgPol

Profile Information

Member since: Wed Apr 18, 2018, 11:31 PM
Number of posts: 114

Journal Archives

Please tell me there are Bob Kroll/Spanky ads airing or on the way.

The murderous Minneapolis shitheads in blue were trained and led by Trump-supporting asshole Bob Kroll, head of the Minneapolis Police Union. HE'S the main person responsible for the police-civilian divide and pain in Minneapolis, and the asshole also praised Spanky for his "support" for the blue over Obama's "destructive" policies at a trump rally (there's video of this). The shithead (Kroll) last spoke about George Floyd's tragic murder just a few days ago telling people not to "jump to conclusions." as expected. He and Spanky are on the same page, and there must be ads made by either the Biden campaign or the Lincoln Project (sadly the latter may be "law and order" adjacent outside of their Spanky hatred) to show and hammer this over and over.
Posted by ProgRocknProgPol | Sun May 31, 2020, 06:46 PM (1 replies)

Be Prepared for Rampant "Law and Order" Dogwhistling

Spanky's latest psychotic tweets (dumbass even quoted a racist sack of shit from the 1968 protest era) just gave away the whole game. It wouldn't surprise me if the trump-supporting asshole leading the MPD federation told his cops to stand down to make themselves look like hapless victims and those protesting them to all be a bunch of maniacs.
Posted by ProgRocknProgPol | Fri May 29, 2020, 03:23 AM (0 replies)

I am 99 percent sure that Spanky's refusal to take questions today is about the Bank of China story

For those who haven't heard about it yet: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/04/24/trump-biden-china-debt-205475

The inevitably incriminating answers by the moron to a question about this would make for both huge legal and financial headaches for his grifting crew and ad catnip for Biden and his team. Biden's team should honestly already be making and targeting ads for this (maybe they are, but I haven't seen any yet). Reading about how the jackass is considering paring down briefings and appearing for shorter periods when he does visit (probably not taking questions again) further bolsters my belief in this.
Posted by ProgRocknProgPol | Fri Apr 24, 2020, 06:21 PM (6 replies)

Does this feel like Korea 2.0 to anyone else?

Spanky and "enemy" escalate to the brink of war and give us all either heart attacks or war wood. Instead, Mr. Cautious steps back and announces some sort of meeting to make "the best deal ever" to make him seem like such a statesman and give him a poll boost. Of course this time there was actually a deal before that Spanky tore up because President Obama was leader then. I'll be OK with everybody being fooled now if it keeps us away from war, but I really hope that this doesn't cause Spanky's reelection.
Posted by ProgRocknProgPol | Tue Jan 7, 2020, 11:14 PM (2 replies)

Can Anyone Explain to Me Rep. Brenda Lawrence's Rationale Here?

Radio interview where Rep. Lawrence wants to bump down from impeachment to censure!

https://www.nobsnewshour.com/no-bs-news-hour-november-24th-2019/

What on Earth was Rep. Lawrence thinking?! She said she hadn't even run this by Speaker Pelosi or her caucus yet! Even if she feels this way, she should have at least tried to get perspective from Speaker Pelosi and/or Rep. Schiff before just blurting out this inanity. She's in a crazy safe Dem district, but might have screwed herself into a primary now, and for what? Sure enough, I scanned right wing-nut headlines after I found this out and those assholes jumped on her segment. Ugh.
Posted by ProgRocknProgPol | Tue Nov 26, 2019, 02:07 AM (2 replies)

One Thing I Will Say About the Special Counsel Report

We need to be 100% crystal clear whether Mueller and Company decided not to pursue whatever indictments they demurred on because:

1) they were stonewalled from obtaining/verifying damning evidence of the charges being investigated from uncooperative/obstructive people/companies (something I am 99% sure of).
2) they truly could not find any such evidence or even a path to where such evidence would be found (HIGHLY doubtful to me; we saw what only makes sense as obstruction being committed out in the open by Spanky and his goons but I am not a lawyer).

I think having every detail of the report made public that would not compromise national security would make explanation (1) crystal clear and show that, no, Trump is not innocent or vindicated. If we hammer hard enough on that point and try to investigate thoroughly ourselves we might also be able to ingrain just how corrupt Spanky and his admin are in the minds of the majority of people outside the Fox/MAGA cult.
Posted by ProgRocknProgPol | Sat Mar 23, 2019, 12:01 PM (2 replies)

So now that we have two obvious potential SNL cold opens, which one do you think they'll do?

The almost-but-not-quite-yet Hanoi deal, or the Cohen congressional craziness?

In all seriousness, I'm just shaking my head in abject disappointment. It's almost certainly too late for Spanky, but I hope the next president knows not to stage a big summit until AFTER THE DEAL IS SEALED.
Posted by ProgRocknProgPol | Thu Feb 28, 2019, 03:47 AM (2 replies)

Has anyone with a law background here kept an eye on the First Step Act?

From what I heard, the Turtle will bring the bill to a senate vote, where if it (most likely) passes, it will be sent back to the house. This bill seems like a good one, but I admittedly have no knowledge of the nitty gritty in the law. I have a few questions:

1) Precisely what increased discretion does it give judges with respect to sentencing and which judges are awarded this discretion?

2) Are the rehabilitation programs proposed for released/minor crime offenders subject to budgetary oversight and performance regulation/evaluation? If so, then by whom?

3) If this bill was such a success, then why didn't Republicans/Spanky try to pass it (or at least use it as a vote motivator) before the midterms? You'd think that they'd try to tout something that may pull some African American Democrats (the Van Jones wing anyway) and Independents over to their side so they wouldn't lose the House.

4) Do the Pubs actually want to pass this bill?

5) After Spanky's spanking today, will he/Republicans try to poison the bill with Wall Funding in order to try and tie the Democrats' hands? Would this even work?
Posted by ProgRocknProgPol | Tue Dec 11, 2018, 10:12 PM (0 replies)

Can anybody well-versed in law answer some questions about the First Step Act for me?

1) Precisely what increased discretion does it give judges with respect to sentencing and which judges are awarded this discretion?

2) Are the rehabilitation programs proposed for released/minor crime offenders subject to budgetary oversight and performance regulation/evaluation? If so, then by whom?

3) If this bill was such a success, then why didn't Republicans/Spanky bleat about it before the midterms? You'd think that they'd try to tout something that may pull some African American Democrats (the Van Jones wing anyway) and Independents over to their side so they wouldn't lose the House.
Posted by ProgRocknProgPol | Wed Nov 14, 2018, 07:35 PM (0 replies)
Go to Page: 1 2 3 4 Next »