Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Celerity
Celerity's Journal
Celerity's Journal
January 10, 2022
Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg outlines justice reform plan after swift pushback
VIDEO AT THE LINK
https://abc7ny.com/manhattan-district-attorney-alvin-bragg-decriminalization-nypd/11442074/
HARLEM, Manhattan (WABC) -- Manhattan's new district attorney has only been in office for a week, but he's already seen a lot of pushback on his policy, which he is now trying to clarify. "This is gonna make us safer. It's intuitive, it's common sense. I don't understand the pushback," Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg said.
There has been plenty of pushback for Bragg during his very first week in office. Critics pounced on the new policy and procedure memo issued Monday, outlining which crimes would be downgraded or no longer prosecuted, like fare evasion. "We were specific. We said we were going to marry fairness and safety, and we laid out a specific plan. We put on the website, we put it in print," Bragg said.
"I called the Manhattan DA myself and asked if he can come and speak this morning to the community so people can be clear on what he's saying and what he's not saying," said Al Sharpton, president and founder of the National Action Network. Bragg was at the National Action Network in Harlem on Saturday morning to clarify his strategy to decriminalize poverty and the mental health issues driving many non-violent offenses. It's a plan he says is being misunderstood. "It's not about letting the criminals out. It's about making room, so you got room in the court and the jails for the real criminals to be in," Sharpton said.
Still, new Police Commissioner Keechant Sewell addressed Bragg's reform in an email to the NYPD saying, "I am very concerned about the implications to your safety as police officers." Those concerns were echoed in statements from both the Police Benevolent Association and the Drug Enforcement Administration. Bragg, who is appearing on Up Close on Sunday, says he is sticking to his plan.
snip
January 10, 2022
https://twitter.com/DonLew87/status/1480050616282099712
Remember the guy who bought Kyle Rittenhouse the AR-15? Dominick Black? Was facing felony charges?
He's reached a proposed plea deal. No felonies. No jail time. $2K fine for 'contributing to delinquency of a minor.' Judge Schroeder must sign off.https://twitter.com/DonLew87/status/1480050616282099712
January 9, 2022
https://twitter.com/DrLeanaWen/status/1478777087444111364
Education Secretary Cardona says schools should stay open
Biden: Schools should stay open despite omicron wave
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/588237-biden-schools-should-stay-open
President Biden on Tuesday reiterated his belief that schools in the United States should remain physically open despite the wave of coronavirus cases driven largely by the omicron variant. Biden noted during remarks at the White House that his $1.9 trillion coronavirus relief plan included billions of dollars to help support school reopenings during the coronavirus pandemic.
“We have no reason to think at this point that omicron is worse for children than previous variants. We know that our kids can be safe when in school by the way. That’s why I believe schools should remain open. They have what they need,” Biden said before a briefing with his COVID-19 response team.
Biden said that $130 billion from the coronavirus relief law passed in March went toward reopening schools and an additional $10 billion was allotted for COVID-19 testing in schools. “That money went out to the states and the states and the school districts have spent this money well, many of them, but unfortunately some of them haven’t,” Biden said. “So, I encourage the states and school districts to use the funding that you still have to protect your children and keep the schools open.”
Biden’s remarks were consistent with his past statements that schools should remain open. The White House has touted the progress on school reopenings in Biden’s first year, distributing a memo to Democrats at the end of last year noting that 99 percent of schools were open compared with 46 percent when Biden took office.
snip
"The President couldn't be clearer--schools in this country should remain open."
Leana Wen, M.D.
@DrLeanaWen Public health professor
@GWPublicHealth Emergency physician. Contributing columnist @WashingtonPost @CNN medical analyst.
"The President couldn't be clearer--schools in this country should remain open." --Jeff Zients at
@WHCOVIDResponse
briefing today.
Reminds us that teachers were prioritize for vaccinations, before most adults. There are vaccines for 5-year olds +. And $130B given to schools.
@WHCOVIDResponse
briefing today.
Reminds us that teachers were prioritize for vaccinations, before most adults. There are vaccines for 5-year olds +. And $130B given to schools.
https://twitter.com/DrLeanaWen/status/1478777087444111364
Education Secretary Cardona says schools should stay open
Education Secretary Miguel Cardona says “students suffered enough” and schools should stay open, after some districts opted for remote learning due to rising COVID cases and safety concerns.
“I know we have the tools to get our school safely open,” Cardona said on NewsNation’s Rush Hour. “And we have to do everything in our power to give our students the best opportunity for success. And that means giving them an in-person learning opportunity.”
“I know we have the tools to get our school safely open,” Cardona said on NewsNation’s Rush Hour. “And we have to do everything in our power to give our students the best opportunity for success. And that means giving them an in-person learning opportunity.”
Biden: Schools should stay open despite omicron wave
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/588237-biden-schools-should-stay-open
President Biden on Tuesday reiterated his belief that schools in the United States should remain physically open despite the wave of coronavirus cases driven largely by the omicron variant. Biden noted during remarks at the White House that his $1.9 trillion coronavirus relief plan included billions of dollars to help support school reopenings during the coronavirus pandemic.
“We have no reason to think at this point that omicron is worse for children than previous variants. We know that our kids can be safe when in school by the way. That’s why I believe schools should remain open. They have what they need,” Biden said before a briefing with his COVID-19 response team.
Biden said that $130 billion from the coronavirus relief law passed in March went toward reopening schools and an additional $10 billion was allotted for COVID-19 testing in schools. “That money went out to the states and the states and the school districts have spent this money well, many of them, but unfortunately some of them haven’t,” Biden said. “So, I encourage the states and school districts to use the funding that you still have to protect your children and keep the schools open.”
Biden’s remarks were consistent with his past statements that schools should remain open. The White House has touted the progress on school reopenings in Biden’s first year, distributing a memo to Democrats at the end of last year noting that 99 percent of schools were open compared with 46 percent when Biden took office.
snip
January 9, 2022
NHS doctor tells Health Secretary he won't get jabbed
What an absolute bellend.
He needs to get the sack.
January 9, 2022
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/01/08/far-right-school-boards/
EATONVILLE, Wash. — On the morning she met her opponent for coffee, Sarah Cole walked in with a front-runner’s confidence. To Cole, the school board seat in this rural red district about an hour outside Seattle was all but hers. Educators and community leaders had endorsed her. She had name recognition from years in the Parent Teacher Association. And, besides, she was running against Ashley Sova, a home-schooling, anti-masking member of the far-right Three Percent movement. “I kind of thought I had it in the bag,” Cole recalled.
Their coffee date that October day, as recounted by both women, was an exercise in gritted-teeth civility. Cole asked about the Three Percent logo tattooed on Sova’s neck in red, white and blue bullets. Sova tried to corner Cole on critical race theory. At the end, they took a photo and promised to work together no matter who was elected, each privately expecting Cole to win.
In December, however, it was Sova who was sworn in, the second Three Percenter on the five-person Eatonville School Board. Three Percenter ideology, part of the self-styled militia movement, promotes conspiratorial views about government overreach and imagines “patriotic” Americans revolting against perceived violations of the Constitution.
Presented as “defending liberty,” extremism analysts say, those far-right views are spreading in conservative places like Eatonville, where the school board race spiralled into a fight over mask mandates and how race is taught in school. Cole lost by more than 200 votes. “The race was basically sabotaged by the national narrative,” Cole said. She sounded incredulous that parents felt best represented by a Three Percenter whose kids aren’t even in public school: “I don’t even know how to explain it except to say, in the face of the facts, they still chose to run with fears.”
snip
A rural Washington school board race shows how far-right extremists are shifting to local power
The establishment candidate thought she was a shoo-in, but she hadn’t contended with the home-schooling, anti-masking member of the far-right Three Percent movement.https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/01/08/far-right-school-boards/
EATONVILLE, Wash. — On the morning she met her opponent for coffee, Sarah Cole walked in with a front-runner’s confidence. To Cole, the school board seat in this rural red district about an hour outside Seattle was all but hers. Educators and community leaders had endorsed her. She had name recognition from years in the Parent Teacher Association. And, besides, she was running against Ashley Sova, a home-schooling, anti-masking member of the far-right Three Percent movement. “I kind of thought I had it in the bag,” Cole recalled.
Their coffee date that October day, as recounted by both women, was an exercise in gritted-teeth civility. Cole asked about the Three Percent logo tattooed on Sova’s neck in red, white and blue bullets. Sova tried to corner Cole on critical race theory. At the end, they took a photo and promised to work together no matter who was elected, each privately expecting Cole to win.
In December, however, it was Sova who was sworn in, the second Three Percenter on the five-person Eatonville School Board. Three Percenter ideology, part of the self-styled militia movement, promotes conspiratorial views about government overreach and imagines “patriotic” Americans revolting against perceived violations of the Constitution.
Presented as “defending liberty,” extremism analysts say, those far-right views are spreading in conservative places like Eatonville, where the school board race spiralled into a fight over mask mandates and how race is taught in school. Cole lost by more than 200 votes. “The race was basically sabotaged by the national narrative,” Cole said. She sounded incredulous that parents felt best represented by a Three Percenter whose kids aren’t even in public school: “I don’t even know how to explain it except to say, in the face of the facts, they still chose to run with fears.”
snip
January 9, 2022
Politico’s Playbook newsletter issued a correction on Saturday morning after misidentifying Democratic leader Chuck Schumer’s wife, Iris Weinshall, as Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor.
The publication claimed that the case of mistaken identity was sparked by a photo sent in by a tipster allegedly taken at the hip D.C. eatery Le Diplomate on Friday night. In Politico’s report, they claimed Sotomayor, after not appearing for oral arguments Friday at the Supreme Court over coronavirus concerns, was dining with Schumer and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. “Our tipster got it wrong, but we should have double-checked,” the correction reads.
The publication never reached out to Schumer’s office. “I did not hear from them prior to publication,” Justin Goodman, Schumer’s top comms aide, told The Daily Beast. Reached for comment, Politico spokesperson Brad Dayspring declined to respond on the record. The Daily Beast was subsequently and accidentally added to a group chat in which he texted two colleagues, “I emailed Mike [Zapler] and Matt [Kaminski] [to] discuss.” Eugene Daniels, who wrote the item, declined to comment through a spokesperson. In a third version of their correction late Saturday, Politico added, “Politico standards require we verify this information...the editor who received the tip failed to do so in this case.”
The Daily Beast reported in late November that Politico’s marquee product has been embedded in turmoil. Late on Saturday evening, readers of Politico’s newsletter made The Daily Beast aware that a subsequent email noting the corrections was not sent. In response, a Politico spokesperson told The Daily Beast: “It will be addressed in tomorrow’s newsletter.”
snip
https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1479977934018560001
Politico Playbook Issues Correction for Botched Sotomayor Sighting
https://www.thedailybeast.com/politico-playbook-issues-correction-after-botched-justice-sonia-sotomayor-sighting-at-le-diplomatePolitico’s Playbook newsletter issued a correction on Saturday morning after misidentifying Democratic leader Chuck Schumer’s wife, Iris Weinshall, as Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor.
The publication claimed that the case of mistaken identity was sparked by a photo sent in by a tipster allegedly taken at the hip D.C. eatery Le Diplomate on Friday night. In Politico’s report, they claimed Sotomayor, after not appearing for oral arguments Friday at the Supreme Court over coronavirus concerns, was dining with Schumer and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. “Our tipster got it wrong, but we should have double-checked,” the correction reads.
The publication never reached out to Schumer’s office. “I did not hear from them prior to publication,” Justin Goodman, Schumer’s top comms aide, told The Daily Beast. Reached for comment, Politico spokesperson Brad Dayspring declined to respond on the record. The Daily Beast was subsequently and accidentally added to a group chat in which he texted two colleagues, “I emailed Mike [Zapler] and Matt [Kaminski] [to] discuss.” Eugene Daniels, who wrote the item, declined to comment through a spokesperson. In a third version of their correction late Saturday, Politico added, “Politico standards require we verify this information...the editor who received the tip failed to do so in this case.”
The Daily Beast reported in late November that Politico’s marquee product has been embedded in turmoil. Late on Saturday evening, readers of Politico’s newsletter made The Daily Beast aware that a subsequent email noting the corrections was not sent. In response, a Politico spokesperson told The Daily Beast: “It will be addressed in tomorrow’s newsletter.”
snip
https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1479977934018560001
January 9, 2022
A former Labour peer has been found guilty of sexual offences against two children in the 1970s. Lord Ahmed of Rotherham was convicted of a serious sexual assault against a boy and the attempted rape of a young girl. Sheffield Crown Court heard the repeated sexual abuse happened in Rotherham when he was a teenager. The 64-year-old, who appeared under his real name of Nazir Ahmed, had denied the charges.
During trial, prosecutor Tom Little QC told the court Lord Ahmed had attempted to rape the girl in the early 1970s, when the defendant was aged 16 or 17 but she was much younger. The attack on the boy, who was aged under 11 at the time, also happened during the same period. Mr Little said Lord Ahmed claimed the allegations were a "malicious fiction" but a phone recording of a 2016 conversation between the two victims showed they were not "made-up or concocted". The woman's call was prompted by an email from the male victim saying: "I have evidence against that paedophile," the jury previously heard.
Lord Ahmed was charged along with his two older brothers, Mohammed Farouq, 71, and Mohammed Tariq, 65, but both were deemed unfit to stand trial. Both had faced charges of indecent assault against the same boy abused by Lord Ahmed. Though the men did not face a criminal trial, jurors concluded that they did commit the alleged acts after hearing evidence in the case. Lord Ahmed, who was convicted following a retrial, resigned from the House of Lords in November 2020 after a conduct committee report concluded he had sexually and emotionally exploited a vulnerable woman who sought his help. The inquiry into his behaviour followed a BBC Newsnight investigation.
The report made him the first peer to be recommended for expulsion but he resigned before this could be implemented. Rosemary Ainslie, head of the Crown Prosecution Service's special crime division, said: "By these verdicts the jury has clearly decided that no matter the delay between the offences and the trial, and the defences raised, they could be sure that the accounts of the victims were credible and true. "One of these defendants held a position of power, influence and responsibility for some time in the House of Lords but this case clearly illustrates that where there is sufficient evidence, even in challenging cases, the CPS will bring a prosecution, put evidence before a jury and see rightful convictions."
snip
Lord Ahmed of Rotherham: Former peer guilty of child sex offences
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-south-yorkshire-59607283A former Labour peer has been found guilty of sexual offences against two children in the 1970s. Lord Ahmed of Rotherham was convicted of a serious sexual assault against a boy and the attempted rape of a young girl. Sheffield Crown Court heard the repeated sexual abuse happened in Rotherham when he was a teenager. The 64-year-old, who appeared under his real name of Nazir Ahmed, had denied the charges.
During trial, prosecutor Tom Little QC told the court Lord Ahmed had attempted to rape the girl in the early 1970s, when the defendant was aged 16 or 17 but she was much younger. The attack on the boy, who was aged under 11 at the time, also happened during the same period. Mr Little said Lord Ahmed claimed the allegations were a "malicious fiction" but a phone recording of a 2016 conversation between the two victims showed they were not "made-up or concocted". The woman's call was prompted by an email from the male victim saying: "I have evidence against that paedophile," the jury previously heard.
Lord Ahmed was charged along with his two older brothers, Mohammed Farouq, 71, and Mohammed Tariq, 65, but both were deemed unfit to stand trial. Both had faced charges of indecent assault against the same boy abused by Lord Ahmed. Though the men did not face a criminal trial, jurors concluded that they did commit the alleged acts after hearing evidence in the case. Lord Ahmed, who was convicted following a retrial, resigned from the House of Lords in November 2020 after a conduct committee report concluded he had sexually and emotionally exploited a vulnerable woman who sought his help. The inquiry into his behaviour followed a BBC Newsnight investigation.
The report made him the first peer to be recommended for expulsion but he resigned before this could be implemented. Rosemary Ainslie, head of the Crown Prosecution Service's special crime division, said: "By these verdicts the jury has clearly decided that no matter the delay between the offences and the trial, and the defences raised, they could be sure that the accounts of the victims were credible and true. "One of these defendants held a position of power, influence and responsibility for some time in the House of Lords but this case clearly illustrates that where there is sufficient evidence, even in challenging cases, the CPS will bring a prosecution, put evidence before a jury and see rightful convictions."
snip
January 9, 2022
https://www.express.co.uk/sport/tennis/1546997/novak-djokovic-australian-open-latest-renata-voracova-tennis-news
Novak Djokovic was pictured maskless at a public event one day after his supposed positive Covid test in December.
The world No 1 one was also seen hugging children at his tennis centre in Dorcol, Serbia a day after his lawyers claimed he had been infected with Covid.
The Serb's lawyers are reportedly planning to use the test in question to validate his medical exemption, which was originally thought would allow him into Australia and compete at this month's Australian Open.
Djokovic is still being held in a Melbourne detention centre after his visa was cancelled upon arrival into the country. The 34-year-old has vocally opposed being jabbed and has refused to reveal his vaccination status in the past.
snip
Novak Djokovic pictured hugging children at public event one day after positive Covid test
NOVAK DJOKOVIC is battling to be allowed into Australia ahead of the year's first Grand Slam.https://www.express.co.uk/sport/tennis/1546997/novak-djokovic-australian-open-latest-renata-voracova-tennis-news
Novak Djokovic was pictured maskless at a public event one day after his supposed positive Covid test in December.
The world No 1 one was also seen hugging children at his tennis centre in Dorcol, Serbia a day after his lawyers claimed he had been infected with Covid.
The Serb's lawyers are reportedly planning to use the test in question to validate his medical exemption, which was originally thought would allow him into Australia and compete at this month's Australian Open.
Djokovic is still being held in a Melbourne detention centre after his visa was cancelled upon arrival into the country. The 34-year-old has vocally opposed being jabbed and has refused to reveal his vaccination status in the past.
snip
January 8, 2022
https://www.washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2022/01/08/manchin-white-house-talks/
Sen. Joe Manchin III (D-W.Va.) on Jan. 4 said he has not spoken with the White House about the Build Back Better Act since he stated his opposition in December. (The Washington Post)
The week before Christmas, Sen. Joe Manchin III sent the White House a $1.8 trillion counteroffer to President Biden’s Build Back Better agenda that included substantial funds for climate, health-care and education initiatives.
About four weeks later, the West Virginia Democrat has made clear that he does not currently support advancing even that offer following a breakdown in negotiations between Manchin and the White House right before Christmas, three people with knowledge of the matter said.
Manchin said publicly this week that he was no longer involved in talks with the White House over the economic package. Privately, he has also made clear that he is not interested in approving legislation resembling Biden’s Build Back Better package and that Democrats should fundamentally rethink their approach. Senior Democrats say they do not believe Manchin would support his offer even if the White House tried adopting it in full — at least not at the moment — following the fallout in mid-December. The people spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss private conversations.
Negotiations deteriorated quickly in December after a White House news release named Manchin as the obstacle to passing the legislation. Manchin then surprised the administration by criticizing the bill on Fox News, after which the White House released a blistering statement calling his credibility into question. Manchin, who has drawn protesters’ ire because of his opposition to the legislation, later said the decision to name him in the news release imperiled the safety of his family.
snip
WaPo: Manchin's $1.8 trillion spending offer appears no longer to be on the table
The West Virginia Democrat, who has consulted Mitt Romney and Trump’s former economic adviser, had backed climate and education spending, but talks are now on icehttps://www.washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2022/01/08/manchin-white-house-talks/
Sen. Joe Manchin III (D-W.Va.) on Jan. 4 said he has not spoken with the White House about the Build Back Better Act since he stated his opposition in December. (The Washington Post)
The week before Christmas, Sen. Joe Manchin III sent the White House a $1.8 trillion counteroffer to President Biden’s Build Back Better agenda that included substantial funds for climate, health-care and education initiatives.
About four weeks later, the West Virginia Democrat has made clear that he does not currently support advancing even that offer following a breakdown in negotiations between Manchin and the White House right before Christmas, three people with knowledge of the matter said.
Manchin said publicly this week that he was no longer involved in talks with the White House over the economic package. Privately, he has also made clear that he is not interested in approving legislation resembling Biden’s Build Back Better package and that Democrats should fundamentally rethink their approach. Senior Democrats say they do not believe Manchin would support his offer even if the White House tried adopting it in full — at least not at the moment — following the fallout in mid-December. The people spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss private conversations.
Negotiations deteriorated quickly in December after a White House news release named Manchin as the obstacle to passing the legislation. Manchin then surprised the administration by criticizing the bill on Fox News, after which the White House released a blistering statement calling his credibility into question. Manchin, who has drawn protesters’ ire because of his opposition to the legislation, later said the decision to name him in the news release imperiled the safety of his family.
snip
January 8, 2022
https://www.salon.com/2022/01/08/sen-ron-johnson-to-seek-reelection-despite-blowback-over-scientifically-questionable-claims_partner/
Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) is reportedly going to seek a third term in office despite having low favorability ratings after months of scientifically illiterate comments about vaccines. According to WISN 12 News' Matt Smith, a Republican source claims that Johnson "will seek re-election and is expected to make his official announcement in the coming days."
https://twitter.com/mattsmith_news/status/1479524758626656263
A poll conducted by Marquette University Law School this past November showed that Johnson has just a 36 percent favorability rating among Wisconsin voters, which is significantly lower than both President Joe Biden and incumbent Democratic Gov. Tony Evers.
Although Johnson has always had a reputation as a conservative Republican, in recent months he has been going more and more into the realm of conspiracy theories and has also cast doubt upon the safety of COVID-19 vaccines.
Just this week, for example, Johnson suggested it was blasphemous to rely upon vaccines to combat COVID-19 when God has given humans perfectly capable immune systems. "Why do we think that we can create something better than God in terms of combatting disease?" the senator said. "There are certain things we have to do, but we have just made so many assumptions, and it's all pointed toward everybody getting a vaccine."
snip
GOP Sen. Ron Johnson to seek reelection despite blowback over scientifically questionable claims
Johnson suggested it was blasphemous to use vaccines when God has given humans perfectly capable immune systemshttps://www.salon.com/2022/01/08/sen-ron-johnson-to-seek-reelection-despite-blowback-over-scientifically-questionable-claims_partner/
Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) is reportedly going to seek a third term in office despite having low favorability ratings after months of scientifically illiterate comments about vaccines. According to WISN 12 News' Matt Smith, a Republican source claims that Johnson "will seek re-election and is expected to make his official announcement in the coming days."
https://twitter.com/mattsmith_news/status/1479524758626656263
A poll conducted by Marquette University Law School this past November showed that Johnson has just a 36 percent favorability rating among Wisconsin voters, which is significantly lower than both President Joe Biden and incumbent Democratic Gov. Tony Evers.
Although Johnson has always had a reputation as a conservative Republican, in recent months he has been going more and more into the realm of conspiracy theories and has also cast doubt upon the safety of COVID-19 vaccines.
Just this week, for example, Johnson suggested it was blasphemous to rely upon vaccines to combat COVID-19 when God has given humans perfectly capable immune systems. "Why do we think that we can create something better than God in terms of combatting disease?" the senator said. "There are certain things we have to do, but we have just made so many assumptions, and it's all pointed toward everybody getting a vaccine."
snip
Profile Information
Gender: FemaleHometown: London
Home country: US/UK/Sweden
Current location: Stockholm, Sweden
Member since: Sun Jul 1, 2018, 07:25 PM
Number of posts: 43,294
