Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Celerity
Celerity's Journal
Celerity's Journal
December 15, 2023
https://prospect.org/blogs-and-newsletters/tap/2023-12-15-corruption-new-york-redistricting/
Westchester (New York) County Executive George Latimer, left, and Deputy County Executive Ken Jenkins
Progressives and Democrats were cheered last week when New York states highest court tossed out the 2022 congressional district map and ordered the states Independent Redistricting Commission to draw a new one. A fairer map could flip as many as five seats back to Democratic. But what sort of Democrat? In New Yorks 16th District, a nasty primary fight is brewing between incumbent Congressman Jamaal Bowman, an African American progressive, and Westchester County Executive George Latimer, who is white and centrist.
Before the 2022 redistricting, more of Bowmans district was in the Bronx, which is heavily Black and Latino. Now, most of the seat is in affluent, largely white Westchester County. Following Bowmans criticism of Israels policy in Gaza and the West Bank, the Israel lobby in the form of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) recruited Latimer to challenge Bowman and promised him scads of money. And Latimer is not shy about pointing out how the new district map will determine the winner. In an interview with the publication City & State, Latimer said that if the new district should include more of the Bronx and less of Westchester County, hes not gonna win that race.
And heres where the plot thickens. Latimer has a fat thumb on the scale. The chair of the Independent Redistricting Commission is Latimers own deputy county executive, Ken Jenkins. If Latimer wins the seat, Jenkins would move up to county executive. Hed be the first African American to hold the post. The New York Working Families Party, a strong backer of Bowman, has issued a demand that Jenkins recuse himself. But unless the power of public opinion shames Jenkins into stepping aside, its not clear who if anyone has the power to remove him.
And it gets worse. Jenkins was appointed to the post by the state Senate president, Andrea Stewart-Cousins, who is also from Westchester. Stewart-Cousins is a close ally of Latimer and Jenkins, and is the first African American woman to lead the Senate. So dont expect her to ask Jenkins to step aside. Redistricting is all about horse trading. Other members of the commission will want changes in other districts and they need to corral votes. It is unlikely that they would cross Chairman Jenkins on the map of the Bowman seat.
snip
Corruption in New York's Redistricting Plans
https://prospect.org/blogs-and-newsletters/tap/2023-12-15-corruption-new-york-redistricting/
Westchester (New York) County Executive George Latimer, left, and Deputy County Executive Ken Jenkins
Progressives and Democrats were cheered last week when New York states highest court tossed out the 2022 congressional district map and ordered the states Independent Redistricting Commission to draw a new one. A fairer map could flip as many as five seats back to Democratic. But what sort of Democrat? In New Yorks 16th District, a nasty primary fight is brewing between incumbent Congressman Jamaal Bowman, an African American progressive, and Westchester County Executive George Latimer, who is white and centrist.
Before the 2022 redistricting, more of Bowmans district was in the Bronx, which is heavily Black and Latino. Now, most of the seat is in affluent, largely white Westchester County. Following Bowmans criticism of Israels policy in Gaza and the West Bank, the Israel lobby in the form of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) recruited Latimer to challenge Bowman and promised him scads of money. And Latimer is not shy about pointing out how the new district map will determine the winner. In an interview with the publication City & State, Latimer said that if the new district should include more of the Bronx and less of Westchester County, hes not gonna win that race.
And heres where the plot thickens. Latimer has a fat thumb on the scale. The chair of the Independent Redistricting Commission is Latimers own deputy county executive, Ken Jenkins. If Latimer wins the seat, Jenkins would move up to county executive. Hed be the first African American to hold the post. The New York Working Families Party, a strong backer of Bowman, has issued a demand that Jenkins recuse himself. But unless the power of public opinion shames Jenkins into stepping aside, its not clear who if anyone has the power to remove him.
And it gets worse. Jenkins was appointed to the post by the state Senate president, Andrea Stewart-Cousins, who is also from Westchester. Stewart-Cousins is a close ally of Latimer and Jenkins, and is the first African American woman to lead the Senate. So dont expect her to ask Jenkins to step aside. Redistricting is all about horse trading. Other members of the commission will want changes in other districts and they need to corral votes. It is unlikely that they would cross Chairman Jenkins on the map of the Bowman seat.
snip
December 15, 2023
https://prospect.org/blogs-and-newsletters/tap/2023-12-14-condition-us-aid-israel-netanyahu/
For more than 30 years, the official policy of the American government (with some deviation during the Trump presidency) has been to support and promote a two-state solution to the problem of Israel-Palestine. The Oslo Accords, which established a process by which a viable and independent Palestinian state could be established alongside Israel, was one of the genuine achievements of Bill Clintons presidency. But for a right-wing Israelis assassination of Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, who championed the accords, they might have led to something like a durable peace or at least a modus vivendi in that vexed land.
Neither the Israeli far right nor the Palestinian extremists ever accepted Oslo; each favors a religiously homogenous regime that runs from the river to the sea. The Israeli far right now dominates Israels government, and that governments leader, Bibi Netanyahu, is now more explicit than hes ever been that no Palestinian state will ever be established. Down in the pollsvery down in the pollsafter having Hamass October 7 murder raid occur on his watch and after refusing to accept any responsibility for having had that happen, Bibi plainly hopes his extreme anti-Palestinian posture will at least win him back the support of the Israeli right. As Israeli columnist Nahum Barnea noted in the centrist newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth, He failed as Mr. Security and he failed as Mr. America. Maybe hell succeed as Mr. Never Palestine.
Which raises a question for the Biden administration and the United States more generally: Why should we support Israel so long as its policy is fundamentally at odds with ours, and with our general support for legitimate national aspirations? Why should we continue to give it aid? Why should we continue to veto United Nations resolutions premised on promoting two-state solutions?
I dont regard such a shift in policy as anti-Israel; I regard it as a necessary form of tough love. Plainly, Israels policy of opposing a Palestinian state has not worked, as numerous acts of terrorism, two intifadas, and the October 7 raid have made all too bloodily clear. Theres no reason whatever to believe that it will work going forward. To the contrary, were Israel to accept a viable Palestine on the West Bank, its clear that its leading Arab neighbors, most particularly Saudi Arabia, would normalize relations with it, and the global Kick Me sign that Israel has affixed to its butt could be removed. (Some kicks would surely continue, due partly to the endurance of antisemitism, but theyd be fewer in number.) Such an accord would require Israel to relinquish a number of its West Bank settlements, but the majority of Israelis (those who live within the nations Green Line accepted borders), having experienced the rule of the settler and ultra-Orthodox extremists in Bibis Cabinet, dont appear all that keen on forfeiting their lives and livelihoods to the demands of those zealots.
snip
Condition U.S. Aid to Israel on a Modicum of Israeli Realism
https://prospect.org/blogs-and-newsletters/tap/2023-12-14-condition-us-aid-israel-netanyahu/
For more than 30 years, the official policy of the American government (with some deviation during the Trump presidency) has been to support and promote a two-state solution to the problem of Israel-Palestine. The Oslo Accords, which established a process by which a viable and independent Palestinian state could be established alongside Israel, was one of the genuine achievements of Bill Clintons presidency. But for a right-wing Israelis assassination of Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, who championed the accords, they might have led to something like a durable peace or at least a modus vivendi in that vexed land.
Neither the Israeli far right nor the Palestinian extremists ever accepted Oslo; each favors a religiously homogenous regime that runs from the river to the sea. The Israeli far right now dominates Israels government, and that governments leader, Bibi Netanyahu, is now more explicit than hes ever been that no Palestinian state will ever be established. Down in the pollsvery down in the pollsafter having Hamass October 7 murder raid occur on his watch and after refusing to accept any responsibility for having had that happen, Bibi plainly hopes his extreme anti-Palestinian posture will at least win him back the support of the Israeli right. As Israeli columnist Nahum Barnea noted in the centrist newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth, He failed as Mr. Security and he failed as Mr. America. Maybe hell succeed as Mr. Never Palestine.
Which raises a question for the Biden administration and the United States more generally: Why should we support Israel so long as its policy is fundamentally at odds with ours, and with our general support for legitimate national aspirations? Why should we continue to give it aid? Why should we continue to veto United Nations resolutions premised on promoting two-state solutions?
I dont regard such a shift in policy as anti-Israel; I regard it as a necessary form of tough love. Plainly, Israels policy of opposing a Palestinian state has not worked, as numerous acts of terrorism, two intifadas, and the October 7 raid have made all too bloodily clear. Theres no reason whatever to believe that it will work going forward. To the contrary, were Israel to accept a viable Palestine on the West Bank, its clear that its leading Arab neighbors, most particularly Saudi Arabia, would normalize relations with it, and the global Kick Me sign that Israel has affixed to its butt could be removed. (Some kicks would surely continue, due partly to the endurance of antisemitism, but theyd be fewer in number.) Such an accord would require Israel to relinquish a number of its West Bank settlements, but the majority of Israelis (those who live within the nations Green Line accepted borders), having experienced the rule of the settler and ultra-Orthodox extremists in Bibis Cabinet, dont appear all that keen on forfeiting their lives and livelihoods to the demands of those zealots.
snip
December 14, 2023
LONDON, Dec 14 (Reuters) - British Foreign Secretary David Cameron said on Thursday that those responsible for settler violence against Palestinians would be banned from entering Britain, following a similar plan by the European Union.
U.N. figures show daily settler attacks in the Israeli-occupied West Bank have more than doubled since the Palestinian militant group Hamas's deadly Oct. 7 attack on Israel from Gaza.
"Extremist settlers, by targeting and killing Palestinian civilians, are undermining security and stability for both Israelis and Palestinians," Cameron said on social media site X, formerly known as Twitter.
"Israel must take stronger action to stop settler violence and hold the perpetrators accountable. We are banning those responsible for settler violence from entering the UK to make sure our country cannot be a home for people who commit these intimidating acts."
snip
https://twitter.com/ashoswai/status/1712792570856718847
UK bans entry for those responsible for settler violence against Palestinians
https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/uk-bans-entry-those-responsible-settler-violence-against-palestinians-2023-12-14/LONDON, Dec 14 (Reuters) - British Foreign Secretary David Cameron said on Thursday that those responsible for settler violence against Palestinians would be banned from entering Britain, following a similar plan by the European Union.
U.N. figures show daily settler attacks in the Israeli-occupied West Bank have more than doubled since the Palestinian militant group Hamas's deadly Oct. 7 attack on Israel from Gaza.
"Extremist settlers, by targeting and killing Palestinian civilians, are undermining security and stability for both Israelis and Palestinians," Cameron said on social media site X, formerly known as Twitter.
"Israel must take stronger action to stop settler violence and hold the perpetrators accountable. We are banning those responsible for settler violence from entering the UK to make sure our country cannot be a home for people who commit these intimidating acts."
snip
https://twitter.com/ashoswai/status/1712792570856718847
December 14, 2023
Label: Radialchoice VSX 1148, Virgin VSX 1148
Format: Vinyl, 12", Single, Limited Edition, 45 RPM
Country: Canada
Released: 1981
Genre: Electronic, Rock, Pop
Style: Synth-pop
Toni Basil - Mickey (BBC Special + Official - 1981) ReMastered
Label: Radialchoice VSX 1148, Virgin VSX 1148
Format: Vinyl, 12", Single, Limited Edition, 45 RPM
Country: Canada
Released: 1981
Genre: Electronic, Rock, Pop
Style: Synth-pop
December 14, 2023
Israel-Hamas latest: IDF determined despite heavy losses in Gaza; ambassador says two-state solution not possible
The Israeli ambassador to the UK has rejected the idea of a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Meanwhile, Israel has vowed to continue its bombardments in Gaza in the face of wavering international support - despite heavy losses.
https://news.sky.com/story/israel-gaza-latest-hamas-war-updates-sky-news-blog-12978800
BREAKING: Israeli ambassador @TzipiHotovely rejects the idea of a two-state solution "The answer is absolutely no"
https://twitter.com/SkyNews/status/1734982762208113039Israel-Hamas latest: IDF determined despite heavy losses in Gaza; ambassador says two-state solution not possible
The Israeli ambassador to the UK has rejected the idea of a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Meanwhile, Israel has vowed to continue its bombardments in Gaza in the face of wavering international support - despite heavy losses.
https://news.sky.com/story/israel-gaza-latest-hamas-war-updates-sky-news-blog-12978800
December 13, 2023
https://archive.is/9er7N
Highland Fine Cheeses in Scotland bills the Minger as the most putrid-smelling cheese on earth.
There is a cheese that may stand alone. In proud fetidness, that is. Rory Stone, a 59-year-old cheesemaker at Highland Fine Cheeses in Scotland, has been overrun with orders for a washed-rind cheese called the Minger, which he is billing as the most putrid-smelling cheese in the world.
Everybody is still asking for samples, and it just hasnt stopped, Mr. Stone said in an interview. And I find it really bizarre. I mean, it is a smelly cheese, but it is quite a lovely flavor. So the only problem now is Ive run out of cheese. Mr. Stone, whose parents were also cheese makers, began selling the Minger seven years ago. (Minger is slang for someone who is ugly or smells bad. There are some Urban Dictionary definitions which are a bit rude, Mr. Stone said.)
Supermarkets initially rejected it, dismissing it as a gimmick. But it sold well enough in independent shops, and it has won several awards, including best specialty cheese at the Royal Highland Show in Edinburgh in 2019.
This week, however, Asda, a British supermarket chain, announced that it would stock the cheese in its stores, making it widely available for the first time. The Asda news release, which described the Minger as pungent, gave rise to a low-grade media frenzy, with Mr. Stone giving interviews to The Telegraph, Sky News and the BBC.
https://twitter.com/SkyNews/status/1732148007351492721
snip
Rory Stone, a Scottish cheesemaker, claims to have made the world's stinkiest cheese. Customers can't get enough.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/08/world/europe/stinkiest-cheese-minger-scotland.htmlhttps://archive.is/9er7N
Highland Fine Cheeses in Scotland bills the Minger as the most putrid-smelling cheese on earth.
There is a cheese that may stand alone. In proud fetidness, that is. Rory Stone, a 59-year-old cheesemaker at Highland Fine Cheeses in Scotland, has been overrun with orders for a washed-rind cheese called the Minger, which he is billing as the most putrid-smelling cheese in the world.
Everybody is still asking for samples, and it just hasnt stopped, Mr. Stone said in an interview. And I find it really bizarre. I mean, it is a smelly cheese, but it is quite a lovely flavor. So the only problem now is Ive run out of cheese. Mr. Stone, whose parents were also cheese makers, began selling the Minger seven years ago. (Minger is slang for someone who is ugly or smells bad. There are some Urban Dictionary definitions which are a bit rude, Mr. Stone said.)
Supermarkets initially rejected it, dismissing it as a gimmick. But it sold well enough in independent shops, and it has won several awards, including best specialty cheese at the Royal Highland Show in Edinburgh in 2019.
This week, however, Asda, a British supermarket chain, announced that it would stock the cheese in its stores, making it widely available for the first time. The Asda news release, which described the Minger as pungent, gave rise to a low-grade media frenzy, with Mr. Stone giving interviews to The Telegraph, Sky News and the BBC.
https://twitter.com/SkyNews/status/1732148007351492721
snip
December 13, 2023
Label: Alternative Tentacles VIRUS 38
Format: Vinyl, LP, Album
Country: US
Released: 1984
Genre: Rock
Style: Punk
The Crucifucks - s/t (1984)
Hardcore punk rock band from Lansing, MI, USA, formed in January 1982 by vocalist and only constant member Doc Corbin Dart. The group was known for Dart's shrill voice, anti-authoritarian lyrics, and extreme antagonism.
The band's original drummer was a young Steve Shelley, who eventually ended up as the permanent drummer for Sonic Youth.
The Crucifucks first album was recorded by Black Flag producer Spot and released on Jello Biafra of the Dead Kennedys' label Alternative Tentacles in 1984.
The band's original drummer was a young Steve Shelley, who eventually ended up as the permanent drummer for Sonic Youth.
The Crucifucks first album was recorded by Black Flag producer Spot and released on Jello Biafra of the Dead Kennedys' label Alternative Tentacles in 1984.
Label: Alternative Tentacles VIRUS 38
Format: Vinyl, LP, Album
Country: US
Released: 1984
Genre: Rock
Style: Punk
December 12, 2023
https://aeon.co/essays/the-moral-imperative-to-learn-from-diverse-phenomenal-experiences
On 26 February 2015, Cates Holderness, a BuzzFeed community manager, posted a picture of a dress, captioned: Theres a lot of debate on Tumblr about this right now, and we need to settle it. The post was accompanied by a poll that racked up millions of votes in a matter of days. About two-thirds of people saw the dress as white and gold. The rest, as blue and black. The comments section was filled with bewildered calls to go check your eyes and all-caps accusations of trolling.
Vision scientists were quick to point out that the difference in appearance had to do with the ambiguity of ambient light in the photograph. If the visual system resolved the photograph as being taken indoors with its warmer light, the dress would appear blue and black; if outdoors, white and gold. That spring, the annual Vision Sciences Society conference had a live demo of the actual dress (blue and black, for the record) lit in different ways to demonstrate the way the difference of ambient light shifted its appearance. But none of this explains why the visual systems of different people would automatically infer different ambient light (one predictive factor seems to be a persons typical wake-up time: night owls have more exposure to warmer, indoor light).
Whatever the full explanation turns out to be, it is remarkable that this type of genuine difference in visual appearance could elude us so completely. Until #TheDress went viral, no one, not even vision scientists, had any idea that these specific discrepancies in colour appearance existed. This is all the more remarkable considering how easy it is to establish this difference. In the case of #TheDress, its as easy as asking What colours do you see? If we could be oblivious to such an easy-to-measure difference in subjective experience, how many other such differences might there be that can be discovered if only we know where to look and which questions to ask?
Take the case of Blake Ross, the co-creator of the Firefox web browser. For the first three decades of his life, Ross assumed his subjective experience was typical. After all, why wouldnt he? Then he read a popular science story about people who do not have visual imagery. While most people can, without much effort, form vivid images in their minds eye, others cannot a condition that has been documented since the 1800s but only recently named: aphantasia. Ross learned from the article that he himself had aphantasia. His reaction was memorable: Imagine your phone buzzes with breaking news: WASHINGTON SCIENTISTS DISCOVER TAIL-LESS MAN. Well, then, what are you?
snip
New research is uncovering the hidden differences in how people experience the world. The consequences are unsettling
https://aeon.co/essays/the-moral-imperative-to-learn-from-diverse-phenomenal-experiences
On 26 February 2015, Cates Holderness, a BuzzFeed community manager, posted a picture of a dress, captioned: Theres a lot of debate on Tumblr about this right now, and we need to settle it. The post was accompanied by a poll that racked up millions of votes in a matter of days. About two-thirds of people saw the dress as white and gold. The rest, as blue and black. The comments section was filled with bewildered calls to go check your eyes and all-caps accusations of trolling.
Vision scientists were quick to point out that the difference in appearance had to do with the ambiguity of ambient light in the photograph. If the visual system resolved the photograph as being taken indoors with its warmer light, the dress would appear blue and black; if outdoors, white and gold. That spring, the annual Vision Sciences Society conference had a live demo of the actual dress (blue and black, for the record) lit in different ways to demonstrate the way the difference of ambient light shifted its appearance. But none of this explains why the visual systems of different people would automatically infer different ambient light (one predictive factor seems to be a persons typical wake-up time: night owls have more exposure to warmer, indoor light).
Whatever the full explanation turns out to be, it is remarkable that this type of genuine difference in visual appearance could elude us so completely. Until #TheDress went viral, no one, not even vision scientists, had any idea that these specific discrepancies in colour appearance existed. This is all the more remarkable considering how easy it is to establish this difference. In the case of #TheDress, its as easy as asking What colours do you see? If we could be oblivious to such an easy-to-measure difference in subjective experience, how many other such differences might there be that can be discovered if only we know where to look and which questions to ask?
Take the case of Blake Ross, the co-creator of the Firefox web browser. For the first three decades of his life, Ross assumed his subjective experience was typical. After all, why wouldnt he? Then he read a popular science story about people who do not have visual imagery. While most people can, without much effort, form vivid images in their minds eye, others cannot a condition that has been documented since the 1800s but only recently named: aphantasia. Ross learned from the article that he himself had aphantasia. His reaction was memorable: Imagine your phone buzzes with breaking news: WASHINGTON SCIENTISTS DISCOVER TAIL-LESS MAN. Well, then, what are you?
snip
December 12, 2023
European trade unions are mobilising today in Brussels against the austerity which would follow reimplanted fiscal rules.
https://www.socialeurope.eu/the-shadow-of-austerity-and-authoritarianism
Marine Le Pena survey published last week by Le Monde revealed a France increasingly accustomed to her far-right discourse
The shock victory of Geert Wilders in the recent Dutch elections has been spoken of in Brussels as if a natural disaster. Some politicians have been clutching their pearls, in complete detachment from its social determinants. But the rise of the far right across Europe is a direct consequence of political decisions taken at European Union level. The austerity imposed following the financial crisis of 2008 created a doom loop of enhanced mistrust in the political system and more extreme voting behaviour, according to recent research. It finds that the far right is the main beneficiary of fiscal consolidationa trend whose impact is heightened by a fall in turnout.
Austerity 2.0
Leaders should keep that in mind as they consider new fiscal rules for the EUthe pre-existing version having been suspended during the pandemic. The current proposal would require member states with a deficit above 3 per cent of gross domestic product to reduce their budget deficit by a minimum of 0.5 per cent of GDP every year. That would mean 14 member states having to cut spending or raise taxes to the tune of 45 billion next year alone. This is austerity 2.0 and the outcome can only be fewer jobs, lower wages and further underfunding of public services. What a gift that would be to the far right, with the European elections due in Juneespecially Marine Le Pen and her Rassemblement National. France is among countries that would need to cut even harder and faster to meet the newand still totally arbitrarytargets. In its case, around 30 billion would need to be raised annually, a study by the Bruegel think-tank found.
Real concerns
The Identity and Democracy group in the European Parliament, which includes RN and Alternative für Deutschland, is already set to win its highest ever seats tally and could become the third largest group. All democrats should concentrate on the real concerns of working people. In Eurobarometer surveys carried out since the last European election, the economy and climate change have consistently emerged as citizens priorities for the EU. It is however precisely these two issuescentral to delivering a fair deal for workerswhich the EU will not be able to address effectively under the reformed fiscal rules as envisaged. They are incompatible with the European Green Deal: when all member states need to scale up investment, they would prevent half of them from making the investments needed to meet the EUs own targets for reduction of greenhouse-gas emissions. Just four would have the fiscal space to realise their climate commitments under the Paris Agreement. At a time when private investment is already in freefall due to record interest rates, strangling public investmentwith its multiplier effectswould ensure another recession, with devastating social consequences. Recessions driven by austerity lead to a significantly larger increase in the vote share for extreme parties than other recessions, according to the research on its political costs.
Taking to the streets
The reimplanted fiscal rules would be bad for the economy, bad for the environment and bad for democracy. That is why thousands of working people from across Europe are taking to the streets in Brussels today to oppose a return to austerity and demand macroeconomic rules which put people and planet first. The EUs response to the pandemic showed what was possible when the political will exists. The suspension of the fiscal rules ensured, through investments which saved jobs and companies, that a health crisis did not become a long-lasting economic malaise. We need to build on the NextGenerationEU programme, which was an economic and political success, by making the investments required to ensure European companies are at the cutting edge of the green and digital revolutions. Public investment must be protected by a golden rule, which provides fiscal space for the spending necessary to meet the EUs own targets under the Green Deal and the European Pillar of Social Rights. Where they are necessary, debt and deficit adjustments need to be made in a sustainable way that does not sacrifice all other economic, social and environmental aims.
Sustainable solution..................
snip
The shadow of austerity--and authoritarianism
European trade unions are mobilising today in Brussels against the austerity which would follow reimplanted fiscal rules.
https://www.socialeurope.eu/the-shadow-of-austerity-and-authoritarianism
Marine Le Pena survey published last week by Le Monde revealed a France increasingly accustomed to her far-right discourse
The shock victory of Geert Wilders in the recent Dutch elections has been spoken of in Brussels as if a natural disaster. Some politicians have been clutching their pearls, in complete detachment from its social determinants. But the rise of the far right across Europe is a direct consequence of political decisions taken at European Union level. The austerity imposed following the financial crisis of 2008 created a doom loop of enhanced mistrust in the political system and more extreme voting behaviour, according to recent research. It finds that the far right is the main beneficiary of fiscal consolidationa trend whose impact is heightened by a fall in turnout.
Austerity 2.0
Leaders should keep that in mind as they consider new fiscal rules for the EUthe pre-existing version having been suspended during the pandemic. The current proposal would require member states with a deficit above 3 per cent of gross domestic product to reduce their budget deficit by a minimum of 0.5 per cent of GDP every year. That would mean 14 member states having to cut spending or raise taxes to the tune of 45 billion next year alone. This is austerity 2.0 and the outcome can only be fewer jobs, lower wages and further underfunding of public services. What a gift that would be to the far right, with the European elections due in Juneespecially Marine Le Pen and her Rassemblement National. France is among countries that would need to cut even harder and faster to meet the newand still totally arbitrarytargets. In its case, around 30 billion would need to be raised annually, a study by the Bruegel think-tank found.
Real concerns
The Identity and Democracy group in the European Parliament, which includes RN and Alternative für Deutschland, is already set to win its highest ever seats tally and could become the third largest group. All democrats should concentrate on the real concerns of working people. In Eurobarometer surveys carried out since the last European election, the economy and climate change have consistently emerged as citizens priorities for the EU. It is however precisely these two issuescentral to delivering a fair deal for workerswhich the EU will not be able to address effectively under the reformed fiscal rules as envisaged. They are incompatible with the European Green Deal: when all member states need to scale up investment, they would prevent half of them from making the investments needed to meet the EUs own targets for reduction of greenhouse-gas emissions. Just four would have the fiscal space to realise their climate commitments under the Paris Agreement. At a time when private investment is already in freefall due to record interest rates, strangling public investmentwith its multiplier effectswould ensure another recession, with devastating social consequences. Recessions driven by austerity lead to a significantly larger increase in the vote share for extreme parties than other recessions, according to the research on its political costs.
Taking to the streets
The reimplanted fiscal rules would be bad for the economy, bad for the environment and bad for democracy. That is why thousands of working people from across Europe are taking to the streets in Brussels today to oppose a return to austerity and demand macroeconomic rules which put people and planet first. The EUs response to the pandemic showed what was possible when the political will exists. The suspension of the fiscal rules ensured, through investments which saved jobs and companies, that a health crisis did not become a long-lasting economic malaise. We need to build on the NextGenerationEU programme, which was an economic and political success, by making the investments required to ensure European companies are at the cutting edge of the green and digital revolutions. Public investment must be protected by a golden rule, which provides fiscal space for the spending necessary to meet the EUs own targets under the Green Deal and the European Pillar of Social Rights. Where they are necessary, debt and deficit adjustments need to be made in a sustainable way that does not sacrifice all other economic, social and environmental aims.
Sustainable solution..................
snip
December 12, 2023
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/12/11/congress-commission-antisemitism-palestinians-israel-free-speech/
https://archive.is/Cy64Q
Cancel culture is back. The difference this time is that the targets are on the left. Republican officials and right-wing commentators are working overtime to criminalize and punish pro-Palestinian speech they disagree with, indiscriminately charging anyone who is insufficiently supportive of Israels war in Gaza with antisemitism. In this expanded understanding of the word, something as simple and moral as support for basic Palestinian rights is suspect. When the current conflict began, there was understandable outrage over the pro-Palestinian advocates unwillingness to condemn Hamass grisly attacks on Israeli civilians. Dozens of student groups issued reprehensible statements excusing Hamas and blaming Israelis for their own deaths. These incidents were then used and continue to be used to more broadly delegitimize pro-Palestinian sentiments.
Republican officials have released a stream of congressional resolutions and public statements that conflate support for the Palestinian cause with support for Hamas. In October, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and his co-sponsors introduced a resolution that lumped Hamass full-throated Jew hatred with what they called the subtle anti-Semitism that holds the State of Israel to a different standard than any other nation. These efforts are intensifying. Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) recently called to suspend a CIA official for posting a picture of the Palestinian flag, comparing it to waving a Nazi flag during World War II. And in a charged congressional hearing last week, Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) grilled the president of Harvard University, Claudine Gay, about antisemitism on campus.
https://twitter.com/SenTomCotton/status/1729947363232408047
In an exchange that went viral, Stefanik zeroed in on students use of the word intifada and claimed it was tantamount to a call for genocide against Jews. Unfortunately, Gay did not challenge the premise of Stefaniks question. Intifada, which means uprising or rebellion in Arabic, came into popular use in the late 1980s during the first Palestinian intifada, which included mass protests, general strikes and economic boycotts against the Israeli occupation. Some uprisings have been violent, but this doesnt mean the word entails violence. This would be akin to claiming that activists who call for revolution are endorsing terrorism because the Russian and French revolutions involved prolonged reigns of terror.
https://twitter.com/shadihamid/status/1732419156828463382
But lost in Republican grandstanding is perhaps the most far-reaching effort yet to punish pro-Palestinian speech a seemingly innocuous bill in Congress to establish a commission to investigate antisemitism in the United States. The legislation uses verbatim the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliances definition of antisemitism as a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. The bill doesnt specify what constitutes a certain perception of Jews and neglects to mention the alliances own elaboration, which includes the targeting of the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity and applying double standards to Israel as examples of potential antisemitism. Under this reasoning, the commission will have broad powers to investigate any criticism of Israel that could be deemed unfair or overly exacting including calls for a cease-fire or citing Israels disregard for Palestinian civilians in its targeting.
snip
Republicans say they believe in free speech. Except when it comes to Israel.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/12/11/congress-commission-antisemitism-palestinians-israel-free-speech/
https://archive.is/Cy64Q
Cancel culture is back. The difference this time is that the targets are on the left. Republican officials and right-wing commentators are working overtime to criminalize and punish pro-Palestinian speech they disagree with, indiscriminately charging anyone who is insufficiently supportive of Israels war in Gaza with antisemitism. In this expanded understanding of the word, something as simple and moral as support for basic Palestinian rights is suspect. When the current conflict began, there was understandable outrage over the pro-Palestinian advocates unwillingness to condemn Hamass grisly attacks on Israeli civilians. Dozens of student groups issued reprehensible statements excusing Hamas and blaming Israelis for their own deaths. These incidents were then used and continue to be used to more broadly delegitimize pro-Palestinian sentiments.
Republican officials have released a stream of congressional resolutions and public statements that conflate support for the Palestinian cause with support for Hamas. In October, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and his co-sponsors introduced a resolution that lumped Hamass full-throated Jew hatred with what they called the subtle anti-Semitism that holds the State of Israel to a different standard than any other nation. These efforts are intensifying. Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) recently called to suspend a CIA official for posting a picture of the Palestinian flag, comparing it to waving a Nazi flag during World War II. And in a charged congressional hearing last week, Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) grilled the president of Harvard University, Claudine Gay, about antisemitism on campus.
https://twitter.com/SenTomCotton/status/1729947363232408047
In an exchange that went viral, Stefanik zeroed in on students use of the word intifada and claimed it was tantamount to a call for genocide against Jews. Unfortunately, Gay did not challenge the premise of Stefaniks question. Intifada, which means uprising or rebellion in Arabic, came into popular use in the late 1980s during the first Palestinian intifada, which included mass protests, general strikes and economic boycotts against the Israeli occupation. Some uprisings have been violent, but this doesnt mean the word entails violence. This would be akin to claiming that activists who call for revolution are endorsing terrorism because the Russian and French revolutions involved prolonged reigns of terror.
https://twitter.com/shadihamid/status/1732419156828463382
But lost in Republican grandstanding is perhaps the most far-reaching effort yet to punish pro-Palestinian speech a seemingly innocuous bill in Congress to establish a commission to investigate antisemitism in the United States. The legislation uses verbatim the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliances definition of antisemitism as a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. The bill doesnt specify what constitutes a certain perception of Jews and neglects to mention the alliances own elaboration, which includes the targeting of the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity and applying double standards to Israel as examples of potential antisemitism. Under this reasoning, the commission will have broad powers to investigate any criticism of Israel that could be deemed unfair or overly exacting including calls for a cease-fire or citing Israels disregard for Palestinian civilians in its targeting.
snip
Profile Information
Gender: FemaleHometown: London
Home country: US/UK/Sweden
Current location: Stockholm, Sweden
Member since: Sun Jul 1, 2018, 07:25 PM
Number of posts: 43,307