HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » HariSeldon » Journal
Page: 1

HariSeldon

Profile Information

Member since: Thu Jul 23, 2020, 11:02 AM
Number of posts: 104

Journal Archives

In my fantasy the House managers said...

"The evidence of this crime is so clear it leaves only one question to be answered by your vote on conviction: do both parties believe in the supremacy of law in our country? Because if one party does not, the other party cannot afford to."

We need to call the events of 1/6/21 "Trump's Insurrection"

Whether the appropriate authorities can hold Trump liable, both in impeachment and in the courts, the insurrection riot was absolutely and unquestionably only intended for his benefit. Framing this issue will also help summon the political support necessary to conviction of Impeachment. We should put this event in the same category as Bacon's Rebellion and Shay's Rebellion.

About these pro-forma Senate sessions

McConnell has said that the first opportunity to move on Articles of Impeachment would be Jan. 19th because the Senate is adjourned but for pro-forma sessions. Pro-forma sessions have been a thorn in the side of Presidents since Bush 43 (under Harry Reid), but I wonder if there is any way for Democrats to either force a pro-forma session to become a normal session that could move on the Articles of Impeachment, or at least force a large number of Republicans to vote against the motion?

We need a new House rule

A rule that, in any case where a violent insurrection (or riot) occurs on the grounds of the US Capitol, the Speaker -- within 72 hours of the restoration of order in the Capitol building -- may make a privileged motion to bring a Bill of Impeachment against the President to the floor for vote immediately, citing failure to adequately secure the US Capitol grounds and, if applicable, incitement to riot or sedition.

This might encourage willful presidents to ensure the proper security of the Capitol building, but it would at least grease the wheels of the impeachmentprocess in this narrow case.

The one non-prosecution of Trump deal I'd grudgingly support

If McConnell and Paul of Kentucky, Miller and Moran of Kansas, Collins of Maine, and Toomey of Pennsylvania all step down after the new Congress starts, then I'd support Biden's admin in fulfilling a non-prosecution agreement for Trump. But the offer has to be made soon, so the Republicans can turn on each other over support for Trump vs. support for keeping the Senate.

Note that these are all Republican US senators in states with Democratic governors who have full discretion over appointing a replacement.

Happy to be official (again)

Hello DUers,

I used to be "Lefty Thinker," but the 2016 security incident left me with cold feet. Since then I've mostly been lurking, but I couldn't stay away from the Democratic Underground community so I'm back with a new name after losing access to the email account under which my previous was registered. I still hold the same heterodox economic theories, but I've since started to pick up Mandarin Chinese -- for fun!

Living in a slightly purplish blue dot in a red sea, I really need the outlet of DU sometimes, and I so value the connectedness and sharp-sightedness of some of our fellow members. I'm glad to be actively back!

(edited for grammar)
Go to Page: 1