General Discussion

calimary

(81,197 posts)

244. Good point. They do follow orders well, though, don't they!

Fri Dec 29, 2017, 01:26 PM

Dec 2017

Good little treason-weasels they are.

If you take your marching orders from an avowed adversary of this country, you ARE by definition a treason-weasel. PERIOD.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

254 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

JPR folks out themselves. They dont want to believe in Russian interference because of... [View all] stevenleser Dec 2017 OP

poor things. JHan Dec 2017 #1

The JPR site is full of fake news from russian sources Gothmog Dec 2017 #2

Seems they're addicted to that shit dalton99a Dec 2017 #3

At one point the JPR site had five or six threads on the Pizzagate silliness Gothmog Dec 2017 #26

There isn't an anti-Clinton conspiracy theory they don't like NastyRiffraff Dec 2017 #180

My first time reading JPR, all I can say is that it will also be my last time. FM123 Dec 2017 #12

I visit the site to see what Russia is pushing Gothmog Dec 2017 #24

Its on Prop Or Nots useful idiot list. lapucelle Dec 2017 #47

That site belongs on this list Gothmog Dec 2017 #73

LOL SunSeeker Dec 2017 #48

There were some posters there during the election that I am almost sure were Russian. Willie Pep Dec 2017 #20

There are posters on that site who are admitted russian trolls Gothmog Dec 2017 #25

Who are they? Jim Lane Dec 2017 #106

This list of fake news websites amuses me Gothmog Dec 2017 #113

So, in other words, you have zero evidence for your original assertion in #25. Jim Lane Dec 2017 #124

Do you really believe that? Gothmog Dec 2017 #126

JPR has a lawyer defending their honor for free! betsuni Dec 2017 #129

If your statement is true then JUST GIVE ME ONE GODDAM LINK Jim Lane Dec 2017 #130

Your passionate and determined defense is noted for the site that bought and spread the pizzagate Squinch Dec 2017 #142

There were five or six threads on this theory on that site Gothmog Dec 2017 #154

IIRC some of them have made similar comments about my posting on DU. (n/t) Jim Lane Dec 2017 #168

That's REALLY bizarre! They commented to you about how DU posts pushed the pizzagate Squinch Dec 2017 #175

The JPR idiots pushed a number of russian lies Gothmog Dec 2017 #200

"intellectual integrity" betsuni Dec 2017 #147

I am also amused Gothmog Dec 2017 #155

Here are just a few examples Gothmog Dec 2017 #150

Disgusting. Creepy. Sickening. NurseJackie Dec 2017 #160

And that doesnt include the misogyny. Their response to this stevenleser Dec 2017 #171

Yep Gothmog Dec 2017 #183

Jim - You are trying to stick up for a site that pushed Pizzagate as Truth stevenleser Dec 2017 #169

Just what is it you think I'm sticking up for -- SPECIFICALLY? Jim Lane Dec 2017 #211

Do you tire of being wrong? Gothmog Dec 2017 #212

You say my claims are fake. Please QUOTE the fake claim(s) I allegedly made. Jim Lane Dec 2017 #213

Can you point to even one of your posts on this thread that is not false? Gothmog Dec 2017 #214

I quite enjoyed Fawk Em's "I'm not a Russian troll" post. Heh. betsuni Dec 2017 #215

Jim will ignore this fact Gothmog Dec 2017 #217

TOTAL reading comprehension fail Jim Lane Dec 2017 #216

Thank you for admitting and conceding that JPR is the site for Russian Trolls Gothmog Dec 2017 #219

I of course said nothing of the kind... Jim Lane Dec 2017 #221

Why are you defending Russian Trolls and people who hate Congressman John Lewis? Gothmog Dec 2017 #222

I'm still stuck on their absolute hatred of Hillary. calimary Dec 2017 #230

Putin hates Clinton and so Putin's puppets on JPR hate Clinton Gothmog Dec 2017 #238

Good point. They do follow orders well, though, don't they! calimary Dec 2017 #244

You are using the same technique Gun enthusiasts use to derail gun control discussions. stevenleser Dec 2017 #240

Thank you for recognizing that I didn't respond to the OP. Jim Lane Dec 2017 #241

JPR is on Prop Or Not's useful idiot list. N/T lapucelle Dec 2017 #185

Jim your defense of this website is sad Gothmog Dec 2017 #197

Hi Jim. sheshe2 Dec 2017 #114

I am a lawyer, correct. Jim Lane Dec 2017 #116

see post 113 sheshe2 Dec 2017 #123

See post 124 (n/t) Jim Lane Dec 2017 #125

Here is another good example Gothmog Dec 2017 #153

Clarity of Signal used to post on JPR and now Fawk em is clearly a russian troll Gothmog Dec 2017 #152

"Does anyone know Gothmog on DU's real name? I plan to sue him for libel if I can find out" progree Jan 2018 #245

How can it be libel when he goes by a screen name? tammywammy Jan 2018 #246

Good questions Gothmog Jan 2018 #250

Thanks for posting this Gothmog Jan 2018 #247

You're welcome. I thought you should know what's going on in JeeperCreeperLand n/t progree Jan 2018 #248

I check that site from time to time to see what Putin is pushing Gothmog Jan 2018 #249

I check it because I am fascinated by aberrant psychology and specious rationalizations progree Jan 2018 #251

The idiots who posts on JPR are fun to laugh at Gothmog Jan 2018 #252

"Trump Isnt Another Hitler. Hes Another Obama." progree Jan 2018 #253

Here are some examples Gothmog Dec 2017 #151

You know what the bottom line on JPR folks is Jim? Its simple... stevenleser Dec 2017 #189

What is "expertise in detecting trolls?" Cary Dec 2017 #223

Sigh. Another one who can't -- or won't -- read. Jim Lane Dec 2017 #224

Do you tire of being wrong? Gothmog Dec 2017 #225

Notice how you change the subject to something about me? Cary Dec 2017 #226

It is not hard to notice Gothmog Dec 2017 #237

Citing the exception to the rule against hearsay should have been a clue Cary Dec 2017 #239

A couple were absolutely Russian, I know for a fact Bradical79 Dec 2017 #86

And to think so many of those whackos used to be here, trying to infect DU. n/t pnwmom Dec 2017 #43

Yep, the split was good IMO! n/t RKP5637 Dec 2017 #53

Some seem to have crept back Hekate Dec 2017 #54

Some still come here radical noodle Dec 2017 #55

Many of the JPR are Trumpsters still trolling a bunch of very naive far lefties....n/m RhodeIslandOne Dec 2017 #111

I agree. saidsimplesimon Dec 2017 #181

K&R mcar Dec 2017 #4

Russian interference aside, she was a bad candidate leftstreet Dec 2017 #5

Some people can't pass up any chance to attack TheDebbieDee Dec 2017 #11

I'm not attacking her leftstreet Dec 2017 #77

"She wasn't a candidate who could beat Trump." LenaBaby61 Dec 2017 #87

What did Sec Clinton do to counteract the Wisconsin and Michigan issues? MadDAsHell Dec 2017 #158

That has been debunked multiple times. stevenleser Dec 2017 #199

Bless your heart for trying to convince them, for the thousandth time...Cant be done Eliot Rosewater Dec 2017 #242

She was not a bad candidate Lithos Dec 2017 #88

Hi Lithos. It's good to see you posting here in these dark times. yardwork Dec 2017 #204

Thanks Lithos Dec 2017 #208

63 million votes is pretty good KatyMan Dec 2017 #14

actually, 65.9 million. niyad Dec 2017 #38

Too bad they changed the rules to make it an Electoral College that picks the Pres. Cuthbert Allgood Dec 2017 #82

Your logic is crap. MyNameGoesHere Dec 2017 #15

+1 KTM Dec 2017 #17

Clinton was a great candidate Takket Dec 2017 #18

Not just deplorables, apparently. Squinch Dec 2017 #81

I agree that Clinton was a great candidate but I would argue that the FBI did even more damage StevieM Dec 2017 #229

So Russia didn't interfere? Cause you wouldn't be saying this if she won you know that right? uponit7771 Dec 2017 #19

I'm confused by this for two reasons: Cuthbert Allgood Dec 2017 #83

1. Implications they didn't interfere are implied by exclusion of mention 2. In that case there's uponit7771 Dec 2017 #95

She was a great candidate. nt Maven Dec 2017 #22

Disagree. She was not a bad candidate. Caliman73 Dec 2017 #23

She didn't take the midwest for granted. StevieM Dec 2017 #231

I don't even think that the states "moved" in any certain direction Caliman73 Dec 2017 #235

Oh please. Codeine Dec 2017 #27

It should never have been close-I have to agree with you on this one. jalan48 Dec 2017 #30

It was not "close." It took the Electoral College, Russia, hacking, collusion, voter suppression... Hekate Dec 2017 #51

And misogyny and Comeys actions nt spooky3 Dec 2017 #72

It didn't "take" the Electoral College. Cuthbert Allgood Dec 2017 #84

Apparently 228 years qualifies as "um, forever". lapucelle Dec 2017 #96

cause you don't want to recognize Russian involvement and Comey, be honest about that uponit7771 Dec 2017 #92

Sandy Hook Shooting should never have resulted in Inaction while kicking out Dreamers JI7 Dec 2017 #134

Wall Street rules and big money decides elections. Meanwhile the little folks are left out. jalan48 Dec 2017 #145

Post removed Post removed Dec 2017 #32

What war-mongering? Can you provide, you know, facts? Hekate Dec 2017 #46

Amazing isn't it? SunSeeker Dec 2017 #57

Just before the election I had lunch with a longtime friend who insisted HRC was a warmonger... Hekate Dec 2017 #63

Yup. The Hillary haters were--and are--totally played by the right wing. SunSeeker Dec 2017 #66

Libya shanny Dec 2017 #140

Libya what? betsuni Dec 2017 #146

Put it in context with the post I responded to. shanny Dec 2017 #157

You mean the UN authorized action in Libya that the international stevenleser Dec 2017 #173

Well spotted Hekate Dec 2017 #178

Why yes, I do mean BS regime change operations, sanctioned by the UN or not. shanny Dec 2017 #191

Blaming Hillary for Lebanese sponsored UN resolutions is insane stevenleser Dec 2017 #192

You mean in the context that you think Hillary Clinton is a warmonger 'cause OMG BENGHAZI? betsuni Dec 2017 #210

Come on. Just say it. Benghazi. We all know you want to. GulfCoast66 Dec 2017 #164

Right? Benghazi and Pizza Gate. You know they believe both stevenleser Dec 2017 #174

Also well spotted Hekate Dec 2017 #179

Cool Story, Bro . stonecutter357 Dec 2017 #35

really? bad candidate? based on WHAT, exactly? 30 years of reichwing propaganda, niyad Dec 2017 #39

You're not wrong leftstreet Dec 2017 #75

The DNC? WTF does the DNC have to do with it? Was the DNC supposed to tell her not to run? seaglass Dec 2017 #97

You're right, sorry leftstreet Dec 2017 #103

Strange, since she WON by THREE MILLION VOTES OVER TRUMP. In any sane country... Hekate Dec 2017 #44

tRump didn't "win" Scarsdale Dec 2017 #45

She wasn't a bad candidate. Officially, she only lost by 70K votes in 3 states, and she carried the pnwmom Dec 2017 #49

I have a couple problems. Cuthbert Allgood Dec 2017 #85

I meant "real voters" as opposed to E.C. electors. Are you saying that the almost 3 million voters pnwmom Dec 2017 #94

She didn't go to Wisconsin for the same reason she didn't campaign in Minnesota. StevieM Dec 2017 #228

So when Feingold told the campaign that things were going bad and she needed to show up Cuthbert Allgood Dec 2017 #232

You can argue that she mishandled the Comey intervention. StevieM Dec 2017 #233

WRONG. She was a terrific candidate. calimary Dec 2017 #59

Thank you for that, Calimary. It means a lot in this moment of darkness. nt Hekate Dec 2017 #64

She may not have been the best candidate, but she was the most qualified. PragmaticDem Dec 2017 #61

I agree leftstreet Dec 2017 #74

True. She clearly was prepared for the job. PragmaticDem Dec 2017 #90

Welcome to DU, PragmaticDem. calimary Dec 2017 #80

Thank you for the welcome! PragmaticDem Dec 2017 #89

oh look, another person easily swayed by propaganda Skittles Dec 2017 #69

She was not a bad candidate. murielm99 Dec 2017 #71

How is it bashing to say someone is a bad candidate? David__77 Dec 2017 #109

Post removed Post removed Dec 2017 #117

I think its criticism. David__77 Dec 2017 #118

Goodbye. murielm99 Dec 2017 #120

Goodbye. David__77 Dec 2017 #128

You contradict yourself. Fla Dem Dec 2017 #78

No, "politics" contradicts itself leftstreet Dec 2017 #79

LOL -repeating a meme over and over again till you actually believe it. They got you shilling. bettyellen Dec 2017 #162

I notice many ppr'd DUers over there tenderfoot Dec 2017 #6

Some of them have tried to slink back in here since the election. nt Maven Dec 2017 #9

Membership at JPR should automatically Codeine Dec 2017 #29

+1000 Hekate Dec 2017 #65

+1 SunSeeker Dec 2017 #67

+1... SidDithers Dec 2017 #98

+1 betsuni Dec 2017 #105

+1 Maven Dec 2017 #119

+1 revmclaren Dec 2017 #127

the owners of this site also own a hate site Mosby Dec 2017 #172

No they dont, Discussionist isnt a hate site. It is overrun with hateful people but that isnt the stevenleser Dec 2017 #187

+1000 stonecutter357 Dec 2017 #37

Yes. They have denied the RU attack because it undermines their narrative Maven Dec 2017 #7

Our own FBI, led by James Comey, launched a much bigger attack on the election and our democracy. StevieM Dec 2017 #16

Yes, Comey and the NY FBI field office also had a disastrous impact. nt Maven Dec 2017 #21

Because he was subjected to fake reports circulated by the same people. Since it was a multi- bettyellen Dec 2017 #163

They are a broken record SHRED Dec 2017 #8

I went over there out of curiosity and was appalled. MiltonBrown Dec 2017 #10

Not only that but their ignorance of our modern economy is shameful. LonePirate Dec 2017 #234

Oh Dear, Oh Dear Me. Dec 2017 #13

It's more complicated than that, but still I don't know for certain that HRC would have won... aikoaiko Dec 2017 #28

I honestly can't read anything from over there...if I can't troll the insanity then I see no point Kirk Lover Dec 2017 #31

There are numerous reasons. guillaumeb Dec 2017 #33

Be careful there ProudLib72 Dec 2017 #41

And we must motivate voters as well. guillaumeb Dec 2017 #101

!!?!? Democrats like Hillary, Republicans didn't like Roy Moore uponit7771 Dec 2017 #100

But they voted for him, just not in large enough numbers. guillaumeb Dec 2017 #102

Extremely poor comparison for obvious reasons. NCTraveler Dec 2017 #137

Your framing, and your opinion. guillaumeb Dec 2017 #161

JackpineRadical, in his own words ... GeorgeGist Dec 2017 #34

Thanks..been a while since I read that. mountain grammy Dec 2017 #42

He was a good guy. The people who stole his name to set up that site have nothing to do with him. n/ pnwmom Dec 2017 #52

An obit still available for those curious: dalton99a Dec 2017 #115

I remember Jackpine Bobbie Jo Dec 2017 #149

Why I don't post there anymore. Its a streetfight. marble falls Dec 2017 #36

they just don't give up, do they? niyad Dec 2017 #40

They are entitled to their opinions and this is NOT saying that there was NO Russian interference karynnj Dec 2017 #50

The leaked emails present a complicated case. Jim Lane Dec 2017 #139

Why are you still going over there, Steve? MineralMan Dec 2017 #56

Because we should never forget who and what they are. And if there arent regular stevenleser Dec 2017 #112

That's not why you do it melman Dec 2017 #132

Are you wearing a sparkly turban with a feather and holding an envelope to your forehead? Squinch Dec 2017 #143

I think you are doing a disservice to the great Carnac with that comparison stevenleser Dec 2017 #186

Melmack the magnificent. Squinch Dec 2017 #188

! stevenleser Dec 2017 #190

It's why I do it. betsuni Dec 2017 #148

There is nothing so discrediting as someone trying to tell someone else stevenleser Dec 2017 #167

I'm not doing that melman Dec 2017 #195

Yes you were, your attempt to explain why you were trying to tell me what I am thinking stevenleser Dec 2017 #196

I used to visit that site when DU was down post-election... mreilly Dec 2017 #177

There are all assholes ismnotwasm Dec 2017 #58

I wonder if that board makes any money off of ads, which I assume is how DU Eliot Rosewater Dec 2017 #60

JPR doesn't run paid ads. Jim Lane Dec 2017 #108

Dumb Is Bipartisan! (nt) ProfessorGAC Dec 2017 #62

they know DAMN WELL Putin owns Trump Skittles Dec 2017 #68

heavy Russian infiltration there orangecrush Dec 2017 #70

Probably most of them are paid by Putin Progressive dog Dec 2017 #76

From what that site was SHRED Dec 2017 #91

i guess they forgot that SHE WON 3 mil more votes than he did. nt TheFrenchRazor Dec 2017 #93

They're assholes and that site is a shithole... mreilly Dec 2017 #99

They love Trump and Putin workinclasszero Dec 2017 #104

Is that the crypto MRA site ? DemocratSinceBirth Dec 2017 #107

lol@Hillary Derangement Syndrome.. Cha Dec 2017 #110

They got what they wanted mcar Dec 2017 #122

The brainwashing is too Cha Dec 2017 #182

They wouldn't know what to do without hatred mcar Dec 2017 #184

jPR: Russia good, America bad, Hillary Clinton (oops, I mean HER) BADBADBADBADBADBAD betsuni Dec 2017 #121

JPR seems to be a fake Democratic Party support site set up to bash Clinton UCmeNdc Dec 2017 #131

WOW, they sure went after you Raine Dec 2017 #133

Jill Stein or Bernie Sanders (pretty much anybody else) can appear as a guest on Fox News ... betsuni Dec 2017 #136

Are any of those people paid to appear as guests? shanny Dec 2017 #159

Guest means you are not paid. CNN, FNC, MSNBC and other networks are stevenleser Dec 2017 #165

I know its Hilarious, and they are too stupid to get it. stevenleser Dec 2017 #170

It doesn't make anyone stupid melman Dec 2017 #193

And you are still doing it! stevenleser Dec 2017 #194

I would hope not. I am suspicious of anyone they like. The other thing stevenleser Dec 2017 #166

LOL, consider it an honor to be on their "S" List Raine Dec 2017 #198

Numerous members there discussed how joyful is would be... NCTraveler Dec 2017 #135

I like the ones who are "beginning to think" Trump might be really bad. Squinch Dec 2017 #201

Who are "JPR folks" shanny Dec 2017 #138

Glad they've left DU PJMcK Dec 2017 #141

LOL! Look at that JPR post! It's hilarious! It's like the refrigerator magnet game with all Squinch Dec 2017 #144

They dont get how stupid they look. stevenleser Dec 2017 #176

they are heaven05 Dec 2017 #156

To this rather dense democrat GulfCoast66 Dec 2017 #202

I only see two posters in the 200 defending the shitty racist misogynists, though. Squinch Dec 2017 #203

Because they, for the most part are not totally stupid GulfCoast66 Dec 2017 #206

Yep, which is why a light has to be shined on them regularly stevenleser Dec 2017 #209

Hillary does not matter in this quaker bill Dec 2017 #205

I did like how Stein's first order of business was going on Fox News to gloat and piss on Hillary Blue_Tires Dec 2017 #207

Have they taken the country back yet? Scurrilous Dec 2017 #218

No Gothmog Dec 2017 #220

Surprise! duforsure Dec 2017 #227

so many of them were bern bros who left DU after Hillary received the nomination dlwickham Dec 2017 #236

I agree they have Democratic Party Derangement Syndrome LeftInTX Dec 2017 #243

jpr manny sh** stain lol XRubicon Jan 2018 #254