Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: (THREAD) BREAKING - The NYT has published a bombshell report on George Papadopoulos [View all]BumRushDaShow
(128,441 posts)97. What?
The only thing Im saying here is that theyre not looking for money laundering in the Trump Organization.
They might not have started the investigation in that direction but the indictments that have come down so far and the types of prosecutors that have been brought on board to date, who are experts in such, strongly suggests they are looking in that direction - again as a potential motive.
And I have absolutely no expectation of anything happening to Drumpf anytime soon. The Watergate break-in happened in 1972 and it took a year before the evidence began to mount regarding who was behind it, leading to another year's worth of hearings and court cases until such point that Nixon was finally cornered and resigned 2 years after the initial episode.
We are still at the beginning of this....
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
107 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
(THREAD) BREAKING - The NYT has published a bombshell report on George Papadopoulos [View all]
bathroommonkey76
Dec 2017
OP
I also believe the high-ranking republican elected pols were in on this, too!
TheDebbieDee
Dec 2017
#2
#TrumpRussia 50 tweet MEGA-THREAD by Seth -- history's most explosive intel dossier .....
L. Coyote
Dec 2017
#81
Wow, thanks for sharing this excellent synopsis, really pulls the whole picture together.
lark
Jan 2018
#103
Hearings will happen, meanwhile there is a deference to Mueller's investigation and its integrity.
L. Coyote
Jan 2018
#104
Trump is a principal in the conspiracy of Aiding & Abetting Computer Crimes; can be charged with it.
NBachers
Dec 2017
#3
I looked it up and a member of the Supreme Court can be impeached. If it can be proved
Maraya1969
Dec 2017
#33
The end of the GOP would be another alternative / add-on. But I'm with you.
Bernardo de La Paz
Dec 2017
#44
why not link to the NYT article instead of giving this guy so much free self promotion?
msongs
Dec 2017
#12
Sorry to disappoint, but this has been all over DU and the internet since at least this morning.
George II
Dec 2017
#29
Starting to detect a pattern ... when Two Scoops goes too far off the rails with his bullshit ...
mr_lebowski
Dec 2017
#32
Yes, NYT always checks it stories with principals, so Gang get alerted & go ape (in tRump's case) nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Dec 2017
#36
Thank you for posting it all; it's a gadawful thing to have to do (hard enough to read). . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Dec 2017
#34
RW line today was that Sen Lindsey Graham had "confirmed" that the Steele
Bernardo de La Paz
Dec 2017
#37
abramson is trying to inform the public so no one can cover all this up
questionseverything
Dec 2017
#88
They need significantly more than just tax records to prove a money laundering case.
Calista241
Dec 2017
#87
"improved Russia relations" is only one of tons of quid pro quo's that could be established no? tia
uponit7771
Dec 2017
#100
Yes, must be. But his NYT leaker got confused / upstaged by the tRump interview.
Bernardo de La Paz
Dec 2017
#41