Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

stopbush

(24,375 posts)
69. The Rs will still attack Pelosi if she steps aside in her leadership role.
Thu Mar 15, 2018, 11:38 AM
Mar 2018

Rs are generally lazy, stupid or both. Most won’t know if Pelosi has been replaced, so they can continue to attack her as if she wasn’t replaced.

Hell, Rs still attack Jimmy Carter.

why the hell are we letting Rethuglican disdain for Pelosi determine OUR leadership? hlthe2b Mar 2018 #1
Absolutely correct. And yet it is there. Stinky The Clown Mar 2018 #3
So many don't even bother to educate themselves as to what she HAS accomplished AND hlthe2b Mar 2018 #7
And they have no clue what a Speaker/Leader actually does EffieBlack Mar 2018 #17
I supported Nancy P. right up until she said: "The Impeachment of George W. Bush is OFF THE TABLE." vkkv Mar 2018 #84
"You" don't vote for the Speaker. There's a reason for that. ehrnst Mar 2018 #107
Your argument just keeps getting further and further from the subject and I'm guessing that is vkkv Mar 2018 #122
No, I'm reiterating the topic when you try to change what you said. ehrnst Mar 2018 #140
Maybe those of us that are Dems that would like to see someone new Cuthbert Allgood Mar 2018 #4
Wow. You win this thread. Ageism AND sexism. Stinky The Clown Mar 2018 #6
Oh, blah Cuthbert Allgood Mar 2018 #10
And since when has the Minority Leader had the responsibility to ehrnst Mar 2018 #81
Never said her job was to get out the vote. Cuthbert Allgood Mar 2018 #95
Actually you said this: ehrnst Mar 2018 #100
Yup. Notice nowhere in there do I say she is responsible for GOTV campaigns Cuthbert Allgood Mar 2018 #104
Moving the goalposts again ehrnst Mar 2018 #135
Good grief. Atman Mar 2018 #270
No. ehrnst Mar 2018 #273
Geeeezzzuzzz.. vkkv Mar 2018 #125
Gawwwwwwwwdddd.... ehrnst Mar 2018 #136
If being turned on is a requirement then we get more Trump empty suits. Not good. bettyellen Mar 2018 #239
Or just wealthier Taylor Swifts. Can't force caring Hortensis Mar 2018 #250
What evidence do you have that she turns off the largest voting block EffieBlack Mar 2018 #248
:) Repubs, Russia and...these all bashing Pelosi after PA. Hortensis Mar 2018 #251
Thank you n/t emulatorloo Mar 2018 #296
Funny not funny how Pelosi needs to go because Republicans hate her for being too liberal EffieBlack Mar 2018 #299
Yeah I notice that too ... emulatorloo Mar 2018 #300
Okie dokey. Act_of_Reparation Mar 2018 #170
"Partly" Being the operative term EffieBlack Mar 2018 #177
True this. (nt) ehrnst Mar 2018 #179
Funny how that works, isn't it? mcar Mar 2018 #184
Incorrect and irrelevant. Act_of_Reparation Mar 2018 #201
The Minority Leader is part of the team, but the responsibility for winning races EffieBlack Mar 2018 #206
Are you complaining about this stuff to me because you think that's what I think? Act_of_Reparation Mar 2018 #209
I'm not "complaining" to you about anything. I'm responding to your comments EffieBlack Mar 2018 #210
That's quite an accomplishment, as I didn't say anything about Pelosi, Lamb, or Ossof. Act_of_Reparation Mar 2018 #227
Where is that in the job description? ehrnst Mar 2018 #178
Do the words "formal and informal" confuse you? Act_of_Reparation Mar 2018 #193
Does the job of the DCCC confuse you? ehrnst Mar 2018 #202
No, I'm pretty well-educated. Act_of_Reparation Mar 2018 #207
Being well-educated myself ehrnst Mar 2018 #213
Sure you do. Act_of_Reparation Mar 2018 #230
Reality isn't always fun ehrnst Mar 2018 #244
Pelosi raised $47,600,000 for the DCCC 2017. lapucelle Mar 2018 #258
Money did not win the Lamb/ Saccone election. True Blue American Mar 2018 #262
No one Lamb won the PA special election because of money. N/T lapucelle Mar 2018 #266
In Spite Of True Blue American Mar 2018 #267
That's a difference without a distinction. N/T lapucelle Mar 2018 #269
Matter of choice of words! True Blue American Mar 2018 #274
Not in spite of. ehrnst Mar 2018 #315
I am aware of that. True Blue American Mar 2018 #317
Money does indeed help. If you don't have it, you can't win. ehrnst Mar 2018 #314
Who mentioned Pelosi True Blue American Mar 2018 #318
The person you retorted to with your claim "Money did not win the Lamb/ Saccone election." ehrnst Mar 2018 #321
Rant? True Blue American Mar 2018 #322
Yes, rant. ehrnst Mar 2018 #324
Sorry to disagree, but pazzyanne Mar 2018 #118
Well said! mcar Mar 2018 #183
All of this! EffieBlack Mar 2018 #203
The largest voting block in 2016 was those over 65, second highest was 45-64. George II Mar 2018 #199
That's the percentage of the age group that voted. Not the population of the age group in total. Cuthbert Allgood Mar 2018 #204
You're right, I missed that. But from your link and mine, older are roughly equal to younger.... George II Mar 2018 #208
Yeah, the number breakdowns are hard in both, agreed. Cuthbert Allgood Mar 2018 #211
I think its wrong that you double down on the ageism BoneyardDem Mar 2018 #246
"There is NO ONE in the Senate I trust more right now, than Pelosi..." Cuthbert Allgood Mar 2018 #247
Is that how you read it? Figures BoneyardDem Mar 2018 #260
Pelosi isn't in the Senate. Cuthbert Allgood Mar 2018 #272
+1000 (nt) ehrnst Mar 2018 #77
I voted Leave... SidDithers Mar 2018 #94
Good to know that you support Cuthbert Allgood Mar 2018 #96
That's very offensive. Should be removed or self-deleted. vkkv Mar 2018 #102
Life is kind of ageist. We do slow down as we become older. Sophia4 Mar 2018 #127
Only some of us never became any wiser, though. Hortensis Mar 2018 #252
Yep. (nt) ehrnst Mar 2018 #316
case in point. hlthe2b Mar 2018 #8
Hard to retort to that stellar argumentation. Cuthbert Allgood Mar 2018 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author MrsCoffee Mar 2018 #11
Please explain what specific value youth brings to the Speakers job EffieBlack Mar 2018 #18
First, I'm not saying put in an unqualified youth. Cuthbert Allgood Mar 2018 #23
The job of the speaker is not about getting votes out. drray23 Mar 2018 #32
I didn't say it was about getting votes out. Cuthbert Allgood Mar 2018 #34
you demonstrate azureblue Mar 2018 #86
+1 EffieBlack Mar 2018 #89
It is a party leadership role, yes? Cuthbert Allgood Mar 2018 #92
"The face of the Party" ehrnst Mar 2018 #103
You don't think Paul Ryan is a face of the Republican Party? Cuthbert Allgood Mar 2018 #108
I didn't say anything about Ryan. ehrnst Mar 2018 #126
Is Paul Ryan a face of the Republican Party? Cuthbert Allgood Mar 2018 #131
A face. Not THE face EffieBlack Mar 2018 #142
Yes A face. DT and Pence more so. ehrnst Mar 2018 #146
Again with the strawmen... ehrnst Mar 2018 #155
Oh, WRONG argument, Cuth. :) Hortensis Mar 2018 #253
BINGO! EffieBlack Mar 2018 #255
Facts fall on deaf ears here. (nt) ehrnst Mar 2018 #281
Indeed. (nt) ehrnst Mar 2018 #105
Oh so it's now the job of the Minority Leader to be "the face of the party." ehrnst Mar 2018 #101
Since forever Cuthbert Allgood Mar 2018 #111
Third actually. ehrnst Mar 2018 #129
2nd actually. Vice President and then Speaker of the House. Cuthbert Allgood Mar 2018 #132
Ah yes. The counting starts at number two. ehrnst Mar 2018 #156
Oh, so when you tried to correct me it wasn't about victories, right? Cuthbert Allgood Mar 2018 #164
I did, didn't I? ehrnst Mar 2018 #167
Pelosi is not Speaker True Blue American Mar 2018 #319
We are talking generically about the role of Speaker Cuthbert Allgood Mar 2018 #320
I know you do. True Blue American Mar 2018 #325
The Speaker is a party leadership role EffieBlack Mar 2018 #44
SUPERB post RandomAccess Mar 2018 #46
Thank you. No one seemed to be ragging on Gephart or O'Neill for not "appealing to the young'uns" ehrnst Mar 2018 #76
The speaker is SECOND in line for the Presidency Cuthbert Allgood Mar 2018 #113
Don't misstate what I wrote. I said "primarily" not "just" EffieBlack Mar 2018 #138
This clarifies the issue so well mcar Mar 2018 #188
Yes, you did say "primarily." Cuthbert Allgood Mar 2018 #191
Again with the strawmen... ehrnst Mar 2018 #157
That's not the job of Minority Leader ehrnst Mar 2018 #75
Before I start True Blue American Mar 2018 #139
You didn't answer my question EffieBlack Mar 2018 #153
Did I say that? True Blue American Mar 2018 #172
Question EffieBlack Mar 2018 #192
How could I possibly answer that question? True Blue American Mar 2018 #216
If you dont know enough about the Speakers job to explain why younger person EffieBlack Mar 2018 #218
I thought I explained in several posts True Blue American Mar 2018 #221
If the Speakers primary job was to come up with new ideas, I might agree with you. EffieBlack Mar 2018 #224
Pelosi has not been Speaker True Blue American Mar 2018 #263
My point applies to the Leader as well EffieBlack Mar 2018 #278
Pelosi is not the Speaker. Paul Ryan is. lapucelle Mar 2018 #259
Yeah, fuck experience and sheer raw talent RandomAccess Mar 2018 #45
Well, those are two different things. Cuthbert Allgood Mar 2018 #49
They may have talent, but they dont have experience they need to be a Speaker EffieBlack Mar 2018 #58
So who does have the experience, then? Cuthbert Allgood Mar 2018 #205
You're right - I should have been more specific EffieBlack Mar 2018 #214
I can understand that, then. Cuthbert Allgood Mar 2018 #215
Bookers great, but he doesnt have the temperament or interest in being Senate Leader EffieBlack Mar 2018 #219
So Far True Blue American Mar 2018 #261
Yes, I know - you keep saying that we need someone else because new ideas EffieBlack Mar 2018 #277
Why don't you ask the colleagues that keep selecting her for the job? ehrnst Mar 2018 #66
+1 uponit7771 Mar 2018 #57
"New" isn't a rational reason for replacing effective, that's good for curtains not for people uponit7771 Mar 2018 #56
What is the precise and relevant definition of "new blood?" LanternWaste Mar 2018 #70
People with new ideas True Blue American Mar 2018 #147
Who is "doing nothing" in congress? ehrnst Mar 2018 #173
Good luck. (nt) ehrnst Mar 2018 #185
Or "If it ain't broke, don't fix it" ehrnst Mar 2018 #187
Yep, I'm with you. Pelosi already had a go-around at Speaker. vkkv Mar 2018 #74
Then you need to convince those colleagues that keep voting her in ehrnst Mar 2018 #90
We aren't discussing her colleagues though, are we.. vkkv Mar 2018 #99
Um... they're the ones who voted her as Minority Leader, and Speaker ehrnst Mar 2018 #109
Um, we're talking about Pelosi as leader - not who elected for the position. vkkv Mar 2018 #115
Again... you keep changing the topic in order to be able to contradict ehrnst Mar 2018 #121
The 190 or so Democratic members of the House are the people who elected her their leader. George II Mar 2018 #194
Thank you! True Blue American Mar 2018 #151
Most people love their Grandmas pandr32 Mar 2018 #114
Except for straight white men under 30.... ehrnst Mar 2018 #168
I loved my Grandma True Blue American Mar 2018 #265
New is not necessarily better peggysue2 Mar 2018 #186
THANK you! EffieBlack Mar 2018 #14
Well, isn't the reverse true? zipplewrath Mar 2018 #21
So you're saying that Nancy Pelosi is the reason that ehrnst Mar 2018 #133
Actually that's why zipplewrath Mar 2018 #144
But we didn't lose Obama in 2012. ehrnst Mar 2018 #165
Don't know where to start zipplewrath Mar 2018 #180
No, she doesn't run the DCCC. Ray Ben Lujan does. He is the chairman. Not Nancy. ehrnst Mar 2018 #182
The speaker runs everything zipplewrath Mar 2018 #286
No, she doesn't run the DCCC. Ray Ben Lujan does. ehrnst Mar 2018 #288
She's the chairman of the board zipplewrath Mar 2018 #290
No, she's not on a "board" ehrnst Mar 2018 #291
Yes, she "over sees" zipplewrath Mar 2018 #301
Semantics is confusing "overseeing" with "running the day to day operations of" ehrnst Mar 2018 #306
Upon that we can agree zipplewrath Mar 2018 #309
I'm with you on that. (nt) ehrnst Mar 2018 #310
Nancy Pelosi was Speaker of the House when Obama was elected President EffieBlack Mar 2018 #294
I know. All of the blame, and none of the credit. (nt) ehrnst Mar 2018 #298
The Speaker of the House is not responsible for party building EffieBlack Mar 2018 #293
Yes, she is zipplewrath Mar 2018 #302
You seem to be having trouble grasping the difference between supporting an effort EffieBlack Mar 2018 #304
But she is not devoid of responsibility zipplewrath Mar 2018 #308
So, youve gone from She runs everything to shes not devoid of responsibility EffieBlack Mar 2018 #311
She does "run" the DCCC zipplewrath Mar 2018 #312
Ok. Whatever. EffieBlack Mar 2018 #313
Bingo. We didn't let them stop us from nominating Barack Obama. (nt) ehrnst Mar 2018 #54
Obama was young and new.. Your point ? vkkv Mar 2018 #78
I supported Nancy P. right up until she said: "The Impeachment of George W. Bush is OFF THE TABLE." vkkv Mar 2018 #82
He was villified by the GOP. ehrnst Mar 2018 #83
Obama was young and new. A fresh face with NEW IDEAS vkkv Mar 2018 #85
Oh, so now it's her age. ehrnst Mar 2018 #91
What specifically about being young makes someone a more effective Speaker EffieBlack Mar 2018 #93
Then let's pretend, for your sake, that Nancy P. was only 49 but had already been Speaker while vkkv Mar 2018 #149
Since it's not the Speaker's job to win elections, probably yes EffieBlack Mar 2018 #169
Post removed Post removed Mar 2018 #175
Um... Obama got re-elected in 2012 not 2014 ehrnst Mar 2018 #181
I remember at the time many considered him way cooler (largely because he was younger) deurbano Mar 2018 #134
Obama came with less baggage and therefore a smaller, more difficult target for the opposition. vkkv Mar 2018 #141
Oh, so if it's a bad outcome, it's Nancy's fault for being at the helm, if it's a good outcome ehrnst Mar 2018 #161
Yeah - thats pretty much it in a nutshell EffieBlack Mar 2018 #295
I get whiplash sometimes in this topic ehrnst Mar 2018 #297
But I still think Clinton would have won that general election. deurbano Mar 2018 #196
The GOP vilification doesn't mean what you think it does. Obama would have likely gotten re-elected vkkv Mar 2018 #130
Nancy was "at the helm" in 2008 and 2012 when Obama won. ehrnst Mar 2018 #158
Obama won in 2008 & 2012. In 2012 Dems lost House. Nancy lost as Speaker in 2012 and Dems lost vkkv Mar 2018 #166
Most of the time the party that came into the WH loses greatly the following mid term. ehrnst Mar 2018 #190
Ive said this before, but I guess I can repeat it; GWC58 Mar 2018 #254
Sorry, but we have candidates who are winning because they disagree with you BeyondGeography Mar 2018 #2
Why do you think they are running against her? el_bryanto Mar 2018 #5
Because she is a recognizable brand with very high negatives BeyondGeography Mar 2018 #16
I'm not sure it's besides the point el_bryanto Mar 2018 #19
The argument is a number of our candidates pay a steep price when they're associated with her BeyondGeography Mar 2018 #22
Why do they pay that price though? el_bryanto Mar 2018 #27
What exactly is the "status quo" that offends you that she "defends?" ehrnst Mar 2018 #60
Not hard; our House members are blocked by seniority rules in a way that Republicans are not BeyondGeography Mar 2018 #88
If a talented person wanted that position, then they would be ehrnst Mar 2018 #116
Chairs should be term limited True Blue American Mar 2018 #264
It's not a "lifetime job" - it's a two year term. ehrnst Mar 2018 #282
The argument from Dems that would like a new leader is absolutely NOT that she is too liberal. Cuthbert Allgood Mar 2018 #31
Well I guess maybe i'm missing the thread here el_bryanto Mar 2018 #41
I may be reading too much into the OP, but I don't think so. Cuthbert Allgood Mar 2018 #42
So, trashing Pelosi will "gets us the House?" ehrnst Mar 2018 #59
We are not trashing Pelosi. True Blue American Mar 2018 #275
So, if Pelosi is "one of the worst" ehrnst Mar 2018 #279
Of course cannabis_flower Mar 2018 #62
This BannonsLiver Mar 2018 #64
One candidate. And Congressional Democrats choose their leader by majority vote. ehrnst Mar 2018 #55
The writing is on the wall BeyondGeography Mar 2018 #65
Yes, there are some wishful thinkers out there. ehrnst Mar 2018 #160
And running away from her would be malpractice in other places EffieBlack Mar 2018 #97
WHERE is this anti-Pelosi stuff coming from, Hortensis Mar 2018 #245
I have no idea, but it pops up in force every few weeks. EffieBlack Mar 2018 #256
Lol. I heard a couple wishful lies like that today also. Hortensis Mar 2018 #257
A-fricken-men! Proud Liberal Dem Mar 2018 #9
Bravo! EffieBlack Mar 2018 #13
Another question aside from villification Zambero Mar 2018 #15
Yours is a different argument - and not without some merit. Stinky The Clown Mar 2018 #20
Yes, voting for representatives is a form of term limits Zambero Mar 2018 #28
I am of the belief that "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." (nt) ehrnst Mar 2018 #67
Nancy Pelosi has been under attack as long as I can remember. Greybnk48 Mar 2018 #24
K&R betsuni Mar 2018 #25
Let's leave Pelosi alone and let her do her job. PatrickforO Mar 2018 #26
I beg to differ but Pelosi is a lightening rod because is she far far far away from the beachbum bob Mar 2018 #29
Yup. Completely agree. Cuthbert Allgood Mar 2018 #33
The RepubliCONS hate her, and I LOVE it! Greybnk48 Mar 2018 #38
So why do her colleagues keep voting her to the position? ehrnst Mar 2018 #71
Not true shenmue Mar 2018 #73
We do True Blue American Mar 2018 #162
A few years ago jes06c Mar 2018 #30
+1 leftstreet Mar 2018 #232
Well the russian bots & their US counter parts aka republicans, sure want to get rid of her. kydo Mar 2018 #35
republicans absolutely do not want to get rid of pelosi, ever...its there only way to nationalize beachbum bob Mar 2018 #37
Oh don't worry, they still pull George Soros out of storage to beat up all the time. kydo Mar 2018 #39
The HATE her because she makes them look stupid! Greybnk48 Mar 2018 #40
Small point.. trump villifies himself.. Cha Mar 2018 #36
Happy Birthday Notorious RGB! NCTraveler Mar 2018 #50
lol.. Happy Birthday to you, dear Cha Mar 2018 #52
Ironic how they attack women Captain_New_York Mar 2018 #43
Tell that to Al Franken. BannonsLiver Mar 2018 #61
They had something on Franken that could be deployed at this particular time. ehrnst Mar 2018 #198
K&R Big Time. Nt NCTraveler Mar 2018 #47
Well, we'll just keep replacing people until we find one to their liking and approval dalton99a Mar 2018 #48
Apparently the qualifications have changed from Dick Gephart and Steny Hoyer. ehrnst Mar 2018 #72
Excellent point debsy Mar 2018 #51
PSA: A lightning rod is a valuable protective feature. eppur_se_muova Mar 2018 #53
I agree. But... SpankMe Mar 2018 #63
A seasoned professional who is excellent at her job. Yeah, she's got to go. flibbitygiblets Mar 2018 #68
You, GO ON with your bad self EffieBlack Mar 2018 #225
The Rs will still attack Pelosi if she steps aside in her leadership role. stopbush Mar 2018 #69
Excellent point. dalton99a Mar 2018 #98
How about this instead, lets win the House in 2018, and then worry about who will be still_one Mar 2018 #79
Bingo! n/t billh58 Mar 2018 #117
Would that we could. Instead we get silly calls for Pelosi to . . . . step down? Resign? Hard Kari? Stinky The Clown Mar 2018 #148
Amen to that! True Blue American Mar 2018 #223
+1 ffr Mar 2018 #80
No! Remember Harry Reid? He was enemy number 1 before pelosi..... getagrip_already Mar 2018 #87
And Harry cost us the Senate. True Blue American Mar 2018 #174
no, democratic voters cost us the senate.... getagrip_already Mar 2018 #189
Why are you blaming Obama for ACA not being as strong as you wanted? EffieBlack Mar 2018 #220
100% Correct on that. True Blue American Mar 2018 #222
because obama was so feckless.... getagrip_already Mar 2018 #236
Well, I guess you would know how it SHOULD have been done... EffieBlack Mar 2018 #238
Harry cost us the Senate? mcar Mar 2018 #195
By being a weak Leader. True Blue American Mar 2018 #217
Because if Reid hadnt changed the rules to stop the GOP obstruction and get Obamas nominees thru EffieBlack Mar 2018 #229
Not the DCCC? ehrnst Mar 2018 #197
No, its Pelosis Job EffieBlack Mar 2018 #231
OOOOOhhhhhh. Now I see. ehrnst Mar 2018 #243
Amen to that. "It is what is done." pandr32 Mar 2018 #106
Trolls and bots billh58 Mar 2018 #110
+10000 Stinky The Clown Mar 2018 #152
Thank you! BadgerMom Mar 2018 #112
Yes I do Dorn Mar 2018 #119
For better or worse, she has a brand among Rethugs hueymahl Mar 2018 #120
So did Obama. ehrnst Mar 2018 #171
Pelosi isn't the problem. Democrats attacking her - Snap out of it and face towards the enemy! (n/t) FreepFryer Mar 2018 #123
Let people disagree on the matter. Sophia4 Mar 2018 #124
The GOP vilification doesn't mean what you think it does. Obama would have likely gotten re-elected vkkv Mar 2018 #128
So why do you think Obama got elected and re-elected with Nancy at the helm? (nt) ehrnst Mar 2018 #143
GWB zipplewrath Mar 2018 #150
GWB "got elected because he ran to the left of Hillary?" ehrnst Mar 2018 #284
Yeah, pronoun abuse zipplewrath Mar 2018 #285
So he talked goals while she talked strategy to get there. ehrnst Mar 2018 #287
Yes zipplewrath Mar 2018 #289
I also worried that his relative lack of experience with DC hardball ehrnst Mar 2018 #303
We tend to blame the nominee zipplewrath Mar 2018 #305
Wrong, just SO wrong. Nancy was not Speaker in 2012 (sorry). duh.. vkkv Mar 2018 #154
Um... I didn't say she was speaker in 2012. ehrnst Mar 2018 #283
By a male without baggage...absolutely Awsi Dooger Mar 2018 #137
Yes, and they despise people of color. Yet, Obama. (nt) ehrnst Mar 2018 #145
I honestly do not True Blue American Mar 2018 #159
Of course not! mcar Mar 2018 #163
It's Always Been the Misogyny dlk Mar 2018 #176
Quite a discussion here Stinky The Clown Mar 2018 #200
I guess it's not break time yet dalton99a Mar 2018 #212
Is someone the Democratic House Leader for life??? maxrandb Mar 2018 #226
No. Just as long as a majority of the Members continue to want her as their leader nt EffieBlack Mar 2018 #233
That would be my choice,too. True Blue American Mar 2018 #237
John Boner left when he was tired of dealing with party morons. He would still be there if . . . . Stinky The Clown Mar 2018 #240
Well, Nancy is older than Boehner True Blue American Mar 2018 #241
Oh, so she's a "loser" now. Stinky The Clown Mar 2018 #242
Republicans have always and will always disparage Democrats. Lint Head Mar 2018 #228
Remember FDR? He WELCOMED the hate of the MFing republicans!!!! workinclasszero Mar 2018 #234
But but then we might offend their base! EffieBlack Mar 2018 #235
IKR? Yes we can't have that now, can we? grrrrrr workinclasszero Mar 2018 #249
You miss the point. The point is that the party needs FRESH LEADERSHIP. LBM20 Mar 2018 #268
We need FRESH LETTUCE. betsuni Mar 2018 #271
Perfect response EffieBlack Mar 2018 #280
+++ brer cat Mar 2018 #292
YES!!! (nt) ehrnst Mar 2018 #307
The GOP obviously fears Pelosi, bigly. dchill Mar 2018 #276
Nancy Pelosi doesn't care if you hate her Gothmog Mar 2018 #323
She's effective. nocalflea Mar 2018 #326
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So, let's say Pelosi gets...»Reply #69