Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KewlKat

(5,624 posts)
40. I believe it was mentioned that that was standard language in all his NDAs. They covered all bases.
Sun Mar 25, 2018, 08:54 PM
Mar 2018

SOP.

I also recall that she planned on that child and selected the father. It's not the orange spankies.

Was it while Melania was pregnant? Eliot Rosewater Mar 2018 #1
Does not matter dhol82 Mar 2018 #3
I looked at the timing ...the kid could be Trumps...she says it was with a boyfriend but unless she Demsrule86 Mar 2018 #16
That would be a story. IluvPitties Mar 2018 #20
It would explain why paternity was mentioned in the contract. Demsrule86 Mar 2018 #23
IDK what "not impressed" means. If this was a democrat, they would be gone from govt by morning Eliot Rosewater Mar 2018 #28
This is Donald Trump we are talking about here. IluvPitties Mar 2018 #34
Nope I am wrong...I had the affair wrong..the affair was in 2006 not 2011 Demsrule86 Mar 2018 #43
The child was born in 2010 or 2011, if Trump and Daniels had sex once in 2006 Exotica Mar 2018 #31
I thought they had sex I 2011...my mistake that was when she first tried to tell her story. Demsrule86 Mar 2018 #44
yes, 2011 was when she first tried to talk about it Exotica Mar 2018 #45
5 years is a pretty long pregnancy. n/t Ms. Toad Mar 2018 #52
From what we've heard, she had already given birth. Rhiannon12866 Mar 2018 #32
He could have told her, and then she could have told Anderson that he Eliot Rosewater Mar 2018 #35
Well, I'm sure it was a big ratings success for CBS, so there's that Rhiannon12866 Mar 2018 #41
No, she'd given birth the Barron 4 months before. fierywoman Mar 2018 #53
It wasnt really anything that we didnt already know. bearsfootball516 Mar 2018 #2
Having infidelity proven opens him up more to other suits, I'm guessing -nt Freelancer Mar 2018 #4
I liked the part where she goes GusBob Mar 2018 #5
She said she was not attracted to him and didnt want sex with him SummerSnow Mar 2018 #30
I think the sex was transactional for her and not lust-based. The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2018 #51
I know, he's so dreamy eShirl Mar 2018 #61
I guess nothing shocks people about Trump anymore. LisaL Mar 2018 #6
You are missing that they pad 130k to keep her quiet Tumbulu Mar 2018 #7
I think they wasted their money leftstreet Mar 2018 #11
or does anyone know how old the daughter is? Could she be Trump's kid? Demsrule86 Mar 2018 #12
Oh for crying out loud. LisaL Mar 2018 #14
Reading a lot of "nothing to see here" , i bet if this was about you know who Eliot Rosewater Mar 2018 #21
She is 7 and there was paternity mentioned in the agreement. Demsrule86 Mar 2018 #22
Regardless of that, I get suspicious when I see anyone imply "nothing to see here" Eliot Rosewater Mar 2018 #25
Its probably just boilerplate language... Orange Free State Mar 2018 #47
You are implying she was forced or pressured. IluvPitties Mar 2018 #24
No she does not, but she was Tumbulu Mar 2018 #48
So you are saying that she couldn't have just decided, out of her volition, to have sex with him IluvPitties Mar 2018 #49
Maybe, but this is a woman who makes a living Tumbulu Mar 2018 #50
+1000 Pachamama Mar 2018 #58
She explained that DeminPennswoods Mar 2018 #62
we already knew that Skittles Mar 2018 #60
He denied it happened. Tatiana Mar 2018 #8
She has a kid...paternity is mentioned in the agreement...I have to wonder if the kid is Donald's. Demsrule86 Mar 2018 #9
I believe it was mentioned that that was standard language in all his NDAs. They covered all bases. KewlKat Mar 2018 #40
$$$$$ Va Lefty Mar 2018 #10
It's his M.O. of paying hush money that is the story. SunSeeker Mar 2018 #13
Exactly what it would be every second of Faux if this were a Dem ... "President Blackmailed ... mr_lebowski Mar 2018 #54
Yep. And they'd have a point, for once. nt SunSeeker Mar 2018 #64
This case is going to be a big problem for Don-o. So goes one NDA so can go the rest. Kirk Lover Mar 2018 #15
Thinking it's a violation of the pre-nup Arazi Mar 2018 #17
Im thinking theres more... PunksMom Mar 2018 #18
Youre right...now that I recall Clarity2 Mar 2018 #27
She isn't dangerous to him. However, she is one of many. Freethinker65 Mar 2018 #19
It's the payoff before the election, and that he isn't the stud he thinks he is nadine_mn Mar 2018 #26
He's a bully... renegade000 Mar 2018 #29
I still think we're missing a piece of the picture - about the timing and need for a payoff Siwsan Mar 2018 #33
Because she was about to go public right before the election sharedvalues Mar 2018 #37
Well, supposedly Bannon did say they had to take care of around 100 women. Ick Siwsan Mar 2018 #42
Check out the tweets here - this explains why dangerous sharedvalues Mar 2018 #36
I think it's an STD . stonecutter357 Mar 2018 #38
Right, I kept wondering why she emphasis UCmeNdc Mar 2018 #57
Say you're a guy with a lot of money, a third wife and a lot to lose. blogslut Mar 2018 #39
He is the President, world wide wally Mar 2018 #46
This was an interesting interview. underthematrix Mar 2018 #55
Something is missing UCmeNdc Mar 2018 #56
You mean blugbox Mar 2018 #67
Cooper said later there were many "tawdry details" edited out of the story. n/t pnwmom Mar 2018 #59
Brace for leak of tawdry details in 5..4..3..2..1.....n/t Orange Free State Mar 2018 #63
It has nothing to do with the illicit sex. Unless it is really out there like incest. AgadorSparticus Mar 2018 #65
He's very self-conscious and embarrassed by his micropenis... NurseJackie Mar 2018 #66
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So they only fucked once,...»Reply #40