Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

pnwmom

(108,975 posts)
Sat Apr 21, 2018, 07:19 AM Apr 2018

Laurence Tribe on DNC lawsuit: It's NOT a sham. [View all]




This suit is well-grounded jurisdictionally and legally and puts a high-powered piece on the 4-dimensional chessboard that can cause Trump’s circle endless trouble (through discovery and otherwise) after criminal proceedings have been completed.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/democratic-party-files-lawsuit-alleging-russia-the-trump-campaign-and-wikileaks-conspired-to-disrupt-the-2016-campaign/2018/04/20/befe8364-4418-11e8-8569-26fda6b404c7_story.html?utm_term=.64d9a05ffd68

The Democratic National Committee filed a multimillion-dollar lawsuit Friday against the Russian government, the Trump campaign and the WikiLeaks organization alleging a far-reaching conspiracy to disrupt the 2016 campaign and tilt the election to Donald Trump.

The complaint, filed in federal district court in Manhattan, alleges that top Trump campaign officials conspired with the Russian government and its military spy agency to hurt Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton and help Trump by hacking the computer networks of the Democratic Party and disseminating stolen material found there.

“During the 2016 presidential campaign, Russia launched an all-out assault on our democracy, and it found a willing and active partner in Donald Trump’s campaign,” DNC Chairman Tom Perez said in a statement.

“This constituted an act of unprecedented treachery: the campaign of a nominee for President of the United States in league with a hostile foreign power to bolster its own chance to win the presidency,” he said.

SNIP
41 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It's effing malaise Apr 2018 #1
Best Adjective Roy Rolling Apr 2018 #5
+1,000 malaise Apr 2018 #18
1972 redux. DemoTex Apr 2018 #13
+1,000 malaise Apr 2018 #17
Yes. I didn't remember that Watergate was kick-started Hortensis Apr 2018 #14
In hindsight, that was malaise Apr 2018 #16
Yes! They are on the wrong side of history, Hortensis Apr 2018 #20
Remember now the break in to the DNC back then was proven malaise Apr 2018 #21
You're right. That was far simpler, and we did have proof Hortensis Apr 2018 #22
Someone should have told Comey malaise Apr 2018 #23
Comey is too good, too ethical, to understand what is unethical. Hortensis Apr 2018 #24
I did not remember that either. Once again, Rachel is doing sterling service in educating the public Hekate Apr 2018 #29
Mindboggling. There is no moral bottom for them Hortensis Apr 2018 #30
I am glad I watched Rachael last night since it clarified the issue for me. BigmanPigman Apr 2018 #32
Perez has impressed me big time malaise Apr 2018 #33
Excellent news gademocrat7 Apr 2018 #2
Does this prevent the litigants (GOP) from defending themselves in the media? Deb Apr 2018 #3
If I was a GOP rep, I'd certainly see this as an easy way to avoid answering anything! 7962 Apr 2018 #9
No jberryhill Apr 2018 #27
Thanks! And law partners would be the reasonable members. Deb Apr 2018 #28
The Stormy Daniels case is unusual in that the defendant is a controversial Sophia4 Apr 2018 #36
they have 1500 radio stations defending them in advance certainot Apr 2018 #37
I agree with Tribe Gothmog Apr 2018 #4
Yes, and this snippet from the DNC says just what I figured on why it Cha Apr 2018 #39
This suit should survive various motions to dismiss including frivolous litigation. no_hypocrisy Apr 2018 #6
Prof. Tribe is correct. Those who characterize the suit as "frivolous", etc. are Atticus Apr 2018 #7
DNC sued RNC after Watergate & was paid $750,000 (1974 dollars) the day Nixon resigned. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2018 #8
K&R mcar Apr 2018 #10
Finally !! A serious aggressive attack against Trump and co-conspirators. usaf-vet Apr 2018 #11
We will see Sherman A1 Apr 2018 #12
Kick dalton99a Apr 2018 #15
K&R smirkymonkey Apr 2018 #19
All in for that. triron Apr 2018 #25
This administration is doing all it can to alleviate the spooky3 Apr 2018 #26
That's right.. thank you, Lawrence Tribe! Cha Apr 2018 #31
The noose tightens. Honeycombe8 Apr 2018 #34
Per LT's tweet..."after criminal proceedings..." BobTheSubgenius Apr 2018 #35
Yes! "Any number of useful bits of information could come from discovery." Cha Apr 2018 #40
KICK! Cha Apr 2018 #38
I wish we'd done this in 2004. ucrdem Apr 2018 #41
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Laurence Tribe on DNC law...