Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Cha

(296,679 posts)

40. Yes! "Any number of useful bits of information could come from discovery."

Reply to BobTheSubgenius (Reply #35)

Sun Apr 22, 2018, 02:32 AM

Apr 2018

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

41 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Laurence Tribe on DNC lawsuit: It's NOT a sham. [View all] pnwmom Apr 2018 OP

It's effing malaise Apr 2018 #1

Best Adjective Roy Rolling Apr 2018 #5

+1,000 malaise Apr 2018 #18

1972 redux. DemoTex Apr 2018 #13

+1,000 malaise Apr 2018 #17

Yes. I didn't remember that Watergate was kick-started Hortensis Apr 2018 #14

In hindsight, that was malaise Apr 2018 #16

Yes! They are on the wrong side of history, Hortensis Apr 2018 #20

Remember now the break in to the DNC back then was proven malaise Apr 2018 #21

You're right. That was far simpler, and we did have proof Hortensis Apr 2018 #22

Someone should have told Comey malaise Apr 2018 #23

Comey is too good, too ethical, to understand what is unethical. Hortensis Apr 2018 #24

I did not remember that either. Once again, Rachel is doing sterling service in educating the public Hekate Apr 2018 #29

Mindboggling. There is no moral bottom for them Hortensis Apr 2018 #30

I am glad I watched Rachael last night since it clarified the issue for me. BigmanPigman Apr 2018 #32

Perez has impressed me big time malaise Apr 2018 #33

Excellent news gademocrat7 Apr 2018 #2

Does this prevent the litigants (GOP) from defending themselves in the media? Deb Apr 2018 #3

If I was a GOP rep, I'd certainly see this as an easy way to avoid answering anything! 7962 Apr 2018 #9

No jberryhill Apr 2018 #27

Thanks! And law partners would be the reasonable members. Deb Apr 2018 #28

The Stormy Daniels case is unusual in that the defendant is a controversial Sophia4 Apr 2018 #36

they have 1500 radio stations defending them in advance certainot Apr 2018 #37

I agree with Tribe Gothmog Apr 2018 #4

Yes, and this snippet from the DNC says just what I figured on why it Cha Apr 2018 #39

This suit should survive various motions to dismiss including frivolous litigation. no_hypocrisy Apr 2018 #6

Prof. Tribe is correct. Those who characterize the suit as "frivolous", etc. are Atticus Apr 2018 #7

DNC sued RNC after Watergate & was paid $750,000 (1974 dollars) the day Nixon resigned. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2018 #8

K&R mcar Apr 2018 #10

Finally !! A serious aggressive attack against Trump and co-conspirators. usaf-vet Apr 2018 #11

We will see Sherman A1 Apr 2018 #12

Kick dalton99a Apr 2018 #15

K&R smirkymonkey Apr 2018 #19

All in for that. triron Apr 2018 #25

This administration is doing all it can to alleviate the spooky3 Apr 2018 #26

That's right.. thank you, Lawrence Tribe! Cha Apr 2018 #31

The noose tightens. Honeycombe8 Apr 2018 #34

Per LT's tweet..."after criminal proceedings..." BobTheSubgenius Apr 2018 #35

Yes! "Any number of useful bits of information could come from discovery." Cha Apr 2018 #40

KICK! Cha Apr 2018 #38

I wish we'd done this in 2004. ucrdem Apr 2018 #41