Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Not a good sign for Dems in Ohio primary [View all]herding cats
(19,558 posts)14. Yes, I know DeWine was the Republican and Cordray the winning Democrat.
I'm not sure why you thought I didn't?
My point was Kucinich, who lost badly in moderate to low turnout, didn't inspire voters to get to the polls like his supporters thought he would. All politics is local, and we need to focus on each region specifically. Focus on their interests, needs and wants. Which more often than not won't mirror our own by and large. This is why a "national" message is a poor strategy in local elections.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
38 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Goes to show a hard left candidate didn't inspire the demographics some thought it would.
herding cats
May 2018
#4
Then why did you write "Dewine needs to work on a message that resonates with the locals"?
Blue_true
May 2018
#25
I guess it really IS TRUE that a Vermont-style politician isn't always the best choice...
NurseJackie
May 2018
#18
In the governor's race 827,000 Republicans voted and 679,000 Democrats voted.
former9thward
May 2018
#31
It is better. Sabato just changed NC-9 from Lean R to a toss-up with that loss.
OliverQ
May 2018
#11
There isn't a correlation between high primary turnout and general election turnout
mythology
May 2018
#19
DEMS: 679,738 votes, 100% reporting; @gop 827,039 votes, 100% reporting TOTAL VOTES...
riversedge
May 2018
#24