Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Not a good sign for Dems in Ohio primary [View all] Proud liberal 80 May 2018 OP
Not a strong predictor Loki Liesmith May 2018 #1
Kucinich was backed by people who want to depress Democratic turnout. yardwork May 2018 #2
:) Yes, but this is the primary and at that our turnout Hortensis May 2018 #20
Maybe... CincyDem May 2018 #3
Goes to show a hard left candidate didn't inspire the demographics some thought it would. herding cats May 2018 #4
DeWine is the republican, Codray is the democrat. Blue_true May 2018 #12
Yes, I know DeWine was the Republican and Cordray the winning Democrat. herding cats May 2018 #14
Then why did you write "Dewine needs to work on a message that resonates with the locals"? Blue_true May 2018 #25
I see it now! herding cats May 2018 #35
No problem. All of us are getting old. nt Blue_true May 2018 #38
Thank you! NurseJackie May 2018 #15
Tonight this race proved the fact. herding cats May 2018 #17
I guess it really IS TRUE that a Vermont-style politician isn't always the best choice... NurseJackie May 2018 #18
Any group who endorses Kucinich isn't legitimate. herding cats May 2018 #37
Exactly right. nt Blue_true May 2018 #26
Kucinich is Kucinich. He bombed in the 2004 primaries also Tom Rinaldo May 2018 #22
let him be the bellwether of the type that spends their time Ninsianna May 2018 #29
When I was young I liked him. herding cats May 2018 #36
There had better be a great turn-out by the Left in November elocs May 2018 #5
In my district it's normally seventy five percent voting republican. blueinredohio May 2018 #6
I'm not sure where you're getting your numbers. blue neen May 2018 #7
In the governor's race 827,000 Republicans voted and 679,000 Democrats voted. former9thward May 2018 #31
Thank you. blue neen May 2018 #33
The 679,000 figure for Democrats is correct. former9thward May 2018 #34
primaries can be a horrible indicator. Hamlette May 2018 #8
Turnout sucked in NC but it's the primaries. octoberlib May 2018 #9
It is better. Sabato just changed NC-9 from Lean R to a toss-up with that loss. OliverQ May 2018 #11
Great news! We can win this. octoberlib May 2018 #13
Glad Kucinich got whopped. LiberalFighter May 2018 #10
Same here. NurseJackie May 2018 #16
There isn't a correlation between high primary turnout and general election turnout mythology May 2018 #19
Really, this isn't the big news. Bantamfancier May 2018 #21
In a State that votes 50/50 edhopper May 2018 #23
DEMS: 679,738 votes, 100% reporting; @gop 827,039 votes, 100% reporting TOTAL VOTES... riversedge May 2018 #24
The truth on the ground in Ohio RandySF May 2018 #28
Not a predictor RandySF May 2018 #27
Primaries usually suck...we do need to mobilize in Ohio beachbum bob May 2018 #30
OK PL 80... time to re-set your OP headline farmbo May 2018 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Not a good sign for Dems ...»Reply #15