General Discussion

farmbo

(3,121 posts)

32. OK PL 80... time to re-set your OP headline

Reply to Proud liberal 80 (Original post)

Wed May 9, 2018, 12:43 PM

May 2018

DeWine did NOT receive more votes than the democratic field... not even close.
And Mary Taylor did not draw more votes than Cordray... not even close.

Plus, both DeWine and Taylor spent 3x more than All Dems combined on truly nasty attack ads against their Republican opponents. They may both be damaged goods.

Final tally:
Cordray drew 423,264 votes (62%) in a field of six
DeWine drew 494,766 votes(59.8%) in a field of two
Taylor drew 330,783 ((40.2) against DeWine

Sorry, the sky is not falling here in Ohio.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

38 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Not a good sign for Dems in Ohio primary [View all] Proud liberal 80 May 2018 OP

Not a strong predictor Loki Liesmith May 2018 #1

Kucinich was backed by people who want to depress Democratic turnout. yardwork May 2018 #2

:) Yes, but this is the primary and at that our turnout Hortensis May 2018 #20

Maybe... CincyDem May 2018 #3

Goes to show a hard left candidate didn't inspire the demographics some thought it would. herding cats May 2018 #4

DeWine is the republican, Codray is the democrat. Blue_true May 2018 #12

Yes, I know DeWine was the Republican and Cordray the winning Democrat. herding cats May 2018 #14

Then why did you write "Dewine needs to work on a message that resonates with the locals"? Blue_true May 2018 #25

I see it now! herding cats May 2018 #35

No problem. All of us are getting old. nt Blue_true May 2018 #38

Thank you! NurseJackie May 2018 #15

Tonight this race proved the fact. herding cats May 2018 #17

I guess it really IS TRUE that a Vermont-style politician isn't always the best choice... NurseJackie May 2018 #18

Any group who endorses Kucinich isn't legitimate. herding cats May 2018 #37

Exactly right. nt Blue_true May 2018 #26

Kucinich is Kucinich. He bombed in the 2004 primaries also Tom Rinaldo May 2018 #22

let him be the bellwether of the type that spends their time Ninsianna May 2018 #29

When I was young I liked him. herding cats May 2018 #36

There had better be a great turn-out by the Left in November elocs May 2018 #5

In my district it's normally seventy five percent voting republican. blueinredohio May 2018 #6

I'm not sure where you're getting your numbers. blue neen May 2018 #7

In the governor's race 827,000 Republicans voted and 679,000 Democrats voted. former9thward May 2018 #31

Thank you. blue neen May 2018 #33

The 679,000 figure for Democrats is correct. former9thward May 2018 #34

primaries can be a horrible indicator. Hamlette May 2018 #8

Turnout sucked in NC but it's the primaries. octoberlib May 2018 #9

It is better. Sabato just changed NC-9 from Lean R to a toss-up with that loss. OliverQ May 2018 #11

Great news! We can win this. octoberlib May 2018 #13

Glad Kucinich got whopped. LiberalFighter May 2018 #10

Same here. NurseJackie May 2018 #16

There isn't a correlation between high primary turnout and general election turnout mythology May 2018 #19

Really, this isn't the big news. Bantamfancier May 2018 #21

In a State that votes 50/50 edhopper May 2018 #23

DEMS: 679,738 votes, 100% reporting; @gop 827,039 votes, 100% reporting TOTAL VOTES... riversedge May 2018 #24

The truth on the ground in Ohio RandySF May 2018 #28

Not a predictor RandySF May 2018 #27

Primaries usually suck...we do need to mobilize in Ohio beachbum bob May 2018 #30

OK PL 80... time to re-set your OP headline farmbo May 2018 #32