Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

appalachiablue

(41,127 posts)
12. It was around in 2011 & 2012 when Chris Hayes of MSNBC published
Tue May 15, 2018, 10:19 PM
May 2018

Last edited Wed May 16, 2018, 08:24 AM - Edit history (1)

the book, "Twilight of the Elites". Chris refers to the terms and system in his book, and he talked about it.

The term 'oligarchy' has been widely used and all over in the last 5-10 years. French economist Thomas Piketty's massive influential 2013 work, "Capital in the 21st Century," covers the rise of great inequality. You likely saw news of this major publication.

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/apr/28/thomas-piketty-capital-surprise-bestseller

Also, from 2014, Paul Krugman "Why We're in a New Gilded Age," 'Capital in the 21st Century,' Thomas Piketty
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2014/05/08/thomas-piketty-new-gilded-age/

Like so many things, we're impacted by the news we follow, where we live, our life, background, networks and more.

https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2016/10/13/13259860/twilight-elites-trump-meritocracy

Excerpt, 'Twilight of the Elites' (2012) Chris Hayes,
Hayes acknowledges that meritocracy has advantages over the system of special privilege for white Protestants that it replaced. However, he says that it is unsustainable in the long run. Riffing on Michels’s "iron law of oligarchy," which holds that all democratic institutions will end up being run by an internal elite, Hayes proposes what he calls the iron law of meritocracy. He argues that the equality of opportunity that meritocracy promises will inevitably be overwhelmed by inequality of outcome. The people who do well from meritocracy will invest the proceeds from their success in working the system to make sure that they and their kids have the resources they need to continue to do well.

A word I'd never heard before the Trump regime is emolument. Arkansas Granny May 2018 #1
Maybe in graduate schools. Elsewhere, not so much IMO. n/t rzemanfl May 2018 #2
Oligarchy TheRealNorth May 2018 #3
"Oligarchs" was a pretty common slanderous phrase Docreed2003 May 2018 #4
I was familiar with the word before then, but it did not seem to be commonly used until the 2016 EffieBlack May 2018 #6
Agreed Docreed2003 May 2018 #8
That's really an honest self-reflection EffieBlack May 2018 #17
This Atlantic article from 2011 might be useful. The author is a appalachiablue May 2018 #5
Yes, I'm familiar with the word and certainly heard it before 2016. But it was not in common usage EffieBlack May 2018 #7
Jimmy Carter called it just a few years ago, quite bluntly. I credit him for saying it out loud. nt Hekate May 2018 #9
I used it well before 2016 but can't speak to how widespread its use is now. Solly Mack May 2018 #10
I would imagine that Occupy Wall Street could have caused an uptick in usage. Lucky Luciano May 2018 #11
It was around in 2011 & 2012 when Chris Hayes of MSNBC published appalachiablue May 2018 #12
Not like now. Nt BootinUp May 2018 #13
Only in the context of the Roman Republic... comradebillyboy May 2018 #14
Yes oberliner May 2018 #15
Not that I recall. triron May 2018 #16
It is a pretty archaic word that was used in intellectual circles mostly. Blue_true May 2018 #18
Most governments in the world are oligarchies. The new word to me is .... kwassa May 2018 #19
Agree with both of your sentences. appalachiablue May 2018 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Was the term "oligarchy" ...»Reply #12