Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(108,955 posts)

5. That would mean starting over completely. No, thanks.

Fri Jun 1, 2018, 06:29 AM

Jun 2018

None of the ratifications we already have would count if we changed the wording now.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Equal Rights Amendment needs to be rewritten before it's ratified [View all] jmowreader Jun 2018 OP

And by the Congress, which has to write the language spooky3 Jun 2018 #2

A good replacement might be... Tribalceltic Jun 2018 #3

A couple of things dsc Jun 2018 #4

That would mean starting over completely. No, thanks. pnwmom Jun 2018 #5

Don't throw away your work for good in the quest for perfect Lee-Lee Jun 2018 #6

We should start a new one MuseRider Jun 2018 #8

Actually, that very subject came up in the 1970s gratuitous Jun 2018 #9

This isn't the 1970s jmowreader Jun 2018 #10

My point, and apparently I made it badly gratuitous Jun 2018 #12

That would require a separate constitutional amendment meow2u3 Jun 2018 #11