Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(30,481 posts)

14. Isn't that kind of understood in this situation?

Sun Jun 3, 2018, 12:22 AM

Jun 2018

If they don’t want to be under the restraints of a subpoena then they will have to argue against its validity.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So America's mayor threatens constitutional crisis.... [View all] pbmus Jun 2018 OP

"Us" / "We're" ?? DURHAM D Jun 2018 #1

My immediate reaction, as well. n/t Ms. Toad Jun 2018 #11

Is this just a delaying tactic? D_Master81 Jun 2018 #2

Yep, expect nothing else until he is out of office. BigmanPigman Jun 2018 #5

Tapes and personal testimony are legally two completely different animals. former9thward Jun 2018 #7

Bill Clinton was compelled to testify. nt shanny Jun 2018 #10

That was a civil case not criminal. former9thward Jun 2018 #13

It will go to SCOTUS. We do not yet know how they'll decide. hedda_foil Jun 2018 #9

I can't see Roberts or Kennedy shanny Jun 2018 #12

Everybody has a right to go to court SCantiGOP Jun 2018 #4

trumps lawyers have declared him above the law. spanone Jun 2018 #6

This could be a huge blunder standingtall Jun 2018 #8

Isn't that kind of understood in this situation? NCTraveler Jun 2018 #14