General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Indictments Today [View all]Sophia4
(3,515 posts)so quickly.
Why?
Because Trump made a point of saying that he views Putin more as a competitor than as an enemy. Well, that may matter.
Consider this possibility. And it is just a possibility. One of the definitions in Article III, section 3 for treason is giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Another is leveying war against the US -- which could be construed as levying cyberwar against the US. I'm not saying that what was done constitutes cyberwar or that Trump will be found to have given aid and comfort to Russia, but it is a possibility.
If Russian officers are found to have hacked into our election-related websites and performed other acts to involve themselves illegally in our election(s), then Russia's government could be viewed as an enemy. And if Trump or his team gave them aid and comfort in some way, then we could have a treason charge.
Other definitions of treason from our Constitution might also apply.
Article III, section 3:
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.
It's possible. There are a lot of ifs and buts, but it is one possibility. We don't know all the facts yet.