Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

empedocles

(15,751 posts)

1. fox spews 'experts' mock the very idea of treason

Reply to ooky (Original post)

Mon Jul 16, 2018, 12:24 PM

Jul 2018

Fox official line seems to be 'this is the beginning of a historic process.'

On the other hand, 'fox experts', seem to be on a bit looser leash than usual. 'Trump whiffed on Syria', 'Trump dodged on who to believe, his intelligence agencies or Putin . . . waffled on 'meddling' . . .

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So, who still thinks this doesn't fit the definition of treason? [View all] ooky Jul 2018 OP

fox spews 'experts' mock the very idea of treason empedocles Jul 2018 #1

I never watch Fox, but onlyadream Jul 2018 #9

Of course it fits. We were attacked by officers of an enemy state's military in an act of war. hedda_foil Jul 2018 #2

But according to some here it's not really treason woodsprite Jul 2018 #4

Just because they used a new type of weaponry in the attack makes it no less of a war. hedda_foil Jul 2018 #6

I don't think it meets the definition of treason in the Constitution onenote Jul 2018 #3

Why does the X CIA MFM008 Jul 2018 #5

Because he likes to hyperventilate? onenote Jul 2018 #7

It is treason, and some of the Americans who aided the Ruskies will be convicted. Hoyt Jul 2018 #8