Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

hedda_foil

(16,371 posts)

6. Just because they used a new type of weaponry in the attack makes it no less of a war.

Reply to woodsprite (Reply #4)

Mon Jul 16, 2018, 12:44 PM

Jul 2018

Weapon types have changed throughout history. The weapons that will be used in the future will not be the traditional physical projectile type but cyber projectiles. The face of war has changed just as it changed when armor clad warriors found themselves defenseless against bullets.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So, who still thinks this doesn't fit the definition of treason? [View all] ooky Jul 2018 OP

fox spews 'experts' mock the very idea of treason empedocles Jul 2018 #1

I never watch Fox, but onlyadream Jul 2018 #9

Of course it fits. We were attacked by officers of an enemy state's military in an act of war. hedda_foil Jul 2018 #2

But according to some here it's not really treason woodsprite Jul 2018 #4

Just because they used a new type of weaponry in the attack makes it no less of a war. hedda_foil Jul 2018 #6

I don't think it meets the definition of treason in the Constitution onenote Jul 2018 #3

Why does the X CIA MFM008 Jul 2018 #5

Because he likes to hyperventilate? onenote Jul 2018 #7

It is treason, and some of the Americans who aided the Ruskies will be convicted. Hoyt Jul 2018 #8