General Discussion

RandomAccess

(5,210 posts)

67. And NOT calling obviously anomalous and suspicious results

Thu Jul 19, 2018, 12:06 PM

Jul 2018

into question enough to get the kinds of investigations needed is a SURE way to undermine democracy.

For shame.

Oh, and that's one of the few things Trump was RIGHT about.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

71 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

BOMBSHELL - ATTN Naysayers who think elections can't be stolen via machines - [View all] RandomAccess Jul 2018 OP

If Russian was accessing voter rolls at state and local levels NewJeffCT Jul 2018 #1

True. But also remember -- there have been election "problems" with the machines RandomAccess Jul 2018 #2

Exactly. And from the OP it's apparent that individual voting machines... brush Jul 2018 #5

Eye opening! triron Jul 2018 #3

I definitely believe it. RandomAccess Jul 2018 #6

When that happened I felt doom in my gut pandr32 Jul 2018 #33

Wow. FM123 Jul 2018 #4

Twelve years sagesnow Jul 2018 #7

Having remote access software is not bad unless its left running 24/7 Perseus Jul 2018 #30

remote access is a mistake...unless youjust want the best hacker to decide election results questionseverything Jul 2018 #37

K + R Raastan Jul 2018 #8

K&R Scurrilous Jul 2018 #9

We've had folks here pushing the MYTHOLOGY that this isn't possible. lagomorph777 Jul 2018 #10

And that exit polls are useless for determining election fraud. triron Jul 2018 #32

The exit polls in the U.S. aren't designed to detect fraud mythology Jul 2018 #41

I guarantee you. We will STILL hear kcr Jul 2018 #11

From the article in Daily Beast Progressive dog Jul 2018 #12

It's about the machines used to program the voting terminals kcr Jul 2018 #13

I read the article Progressive dog Jul 2018 #17

we have allowed the venders to control our elections questionseverything Jul 2018 #48

The Russians and Hillary haters gave us Trump Progressive dog Jul 2018 #56

since e s&s has admitted to wyden there is a backdoor questionseverything Jul 2018 #61

election integrity activists count 6 wis wards questionseverything Jul 2018 #62

"Election integrity activists" Progressive dog Jul 2018 #63

Is there a possibility that a hacker could change voter rolls via remote software? blogslut Jul 2018 #40

The tabulation of votes is not the same as voter rolls. Progressive dog Jul 2018 #54

You may be right. The problem is -- RandomAccess Jul 2018 #58

We could cut down on the number of voters Progressive dog Jul 2018 #59

Cut down on the number of voters? RandomAccess Jul 2018 #60

"You've been studying it since 2003" Progressive dog Jul 2018 #64

First, I should thank you RandomAccess Jul 2018 #65

The claim I made is a well documented fact Progressive dog Jul 2018 #66

And NOT calling obviously anomalous and suspicious results RandomAccess Jul 2018 #67

I am suspicious of those helping to undermine faith in democracy Progressive dog Jul 2018 #68

Yes - RandomAccess Jul 2018 #57

This is the "you can't handle the truth" part that will perhaps be included in the ElementaryPenguin Jul 2018 #14

It makes me crazy: RandomAccess Jul 2018 #15

Me too. ElementaryPenguin Jul 2018 #16

Me three! JoeOtterbein Jul 2018 #21

I've contemplated it plenty. BadgerMom Jul 2018 #25

I knew this in my gut that fateful Tuesday evening. I have been sick about it ever airmid Jul 2018 #39

"As far as we know, some guy from Russia could be controlling the outcome of computerized elections" MrsCoffee Jul 2018 #18

Thanks RandomAccess Jul 2018 #43

I've always had a bad feeling about our machines, ESPECIALLY seeing with the REPUGS of today!!! bluestarone Jul 2018 #70

Paper Ballots indeed RandomAccess Jul 2018 #71

Enabling conspiracy. moondust Jul 2018 #19

There's certainly no doubt THEY WOULD ElementaryPenguin Jul 2018 #22

Diebold was fined $50 million for doing just that. Lonestarblue Jul 2018 #31

I remember that well. Meadowoak Jul 2018 #35

K&R ck4829 Jul 2018 #20

I swear these voting machine companies did there absolute best gtar100 Jul 2018 #23

Uhhh, not quite RandomAccess Jul 2018 #44

No, I think it was quite intentional. gtar100 Jul 2018 #49

Oh, then we're in agreement RandomAccess Jul 2018 #50

Paper ballots. Counted by a representative of each party by hand. Rep of each party fierywoman Jul 2018 #24

It's a basic national security issue. byronius Jul 2018 #26

Yup: Citizens United has to be destroyed. fierywoman Jul 2018 #29

YES, YES, YES -- And here's what to do about it RandomAccess Jul 2018 #47

Ok, this is not going to be popular, but... Perseus Jul 2018 #27

Perhaps the DNC has always had too many NoMoreRepugs Jul 2018 #34

Yep. Meadowoak Jul 2018 #36

I have never understood why the Democrats haven't been more RandomAccess Jul 2018 #46

AKA....The FIX is in! workinclasszero Jul 2018 #28

And I got some shit on my thread edhopper Jul 2018 #38

Don't Need Remote Access to Alter the Votes Raymond Costello Jul 2018 #42

AND there'll never BE any "reverse engineering" because the RandomAccess Jul 2018 #45

Thank you for posting Time for change Jul 2018 #51

Excellent comments - thanks RandomAccess Jul 2018 #52

I wholeheartedly agree! nightwing1240 Jul 2018 #53

Motherboard? More like Motherfucker Board Blue Owl Jul 2018 #55

It's only simple logic, no physical evidence when they steal it, unless you have exit polls nolabels Jul 2018 #69