It's just math.

[D23MIURG23]

23. Its actually a deductive syllogism with a missing premise.

I can fix it by adding the bolded premise:

P1: God favors America
P2: God favors everyone who favors America
P3: Donald Trump favors America
C: God favors Trump

The above syllogism proves that if premises 1 - 3 are true then the conclusion has to be true. In fact you don't need premise 1. I included it because Mr. Bill included it, and I think he meant for premise 2 to follow from it (it doesn't).

Now that the syllogism is corrected the problem is merely that every premise is ridiculous gibberish with no basis in reality. Premise 2 is especially bad because even if you believed premise 1 as an article of faith, there is no reason for premise 2 to follow from it, or to be true in general. I might favor Michigan State University, but that doesn't mean I would favor everyone else who felt the same way. I wouldn't favor Larry Nassar or John Engler if it turned out that they also favored MSU.

This whole thing smacks of some cheap apologist trying to be William Lane Craig and doing a really bad job of it.