I am SO glad Kamala Harris didn't boycott the Kavanaugh hearings

[haele]

23. That was one of them. He claimed to be a "Strict Constitutionalist"

Which means if it wasn't written down in Black on Tan on the Constitution, there could be no legal certainty on any court case relating to it...
These are some of the things Bork believed.
Privacy isn't spelled out in the Constitution. Therefore, there is no right to Privacy, except to protect from legal jeopardy under the 5th (protection of personal papers and property).
Congress not being able to make a law regarding Religion on the Federal level does not mean that States could not legislate a State Religion and enforce it.
Equal treatment under the Law does not require Integration. There was nothing Constitutionally wrong with Plessy V. Ferguson, and Brown v Board of Education was an overstep of Federal regulation.

And as Scalia, another so-called "Strict Constitutionalist" opined "So long as there wasn't any issues with the due process, there's nothing in the Constitution that protects an potentially innocent person from being executed for a murder s/he didn't commit if evidence was later uncovered that might exonerate them."

Bork was a right arrogant literalist bastard of privilege. Just like all the rest of those elitist Heritage Foundation scum.

Haele