Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brush

(53,742 posts)
10. Since July? I don't get this at all. Why didn't she grill him during the hearing...
Fri Sep 14, 2018, 08:34 AM
Sep 2018

about this like Harris, Leahy and Booker grilled him?

Why sit on it and then after the hearing is over then divulge it?

Just shaking my head.

God! We have to use what we have to stop these crooked, cheating repugs from ramming their crappy nominees unto the court. Stop with the being cautious nice person who doesn't want to ruffle feathers.

Yep.....it's just the way things roll.....that statement is so wrong .....speechless. Nt Ninga Sep 2018 #1
I didn't know the FBI was bound by the same artificial calendar that Chuck Grassley & GOP made up! TheBlackAdder Sep 2018 #2
Jeff Sessions' FBI is on the same calendar. Anon-C Sep 2018 #11
That onecaliberal Sep 2018 #30
he is a friend of jeff...... getagrip_already Sep 2018 #37
So then, release it all to the public Tarc Sep 2018 #3
So DiFi has to release it without divulging the ID of the woman. brush Sep 2018 #4
Trump has the letter, so her anonymity isn't a question anymore... OnDoutside Sep 2018 #6
Rachel says this info was given to the GOP and White House (I guess that includes Russia too). TheBlackAdder Sep 2018 #7
My thoughts exactly blueinredohio Sep 2018 #36
Feinstein has had this information since JULY, so how come it only comes to light now ???? OnDoutside Sep 2018 #5
I thought she just received the info. jalan48 Sep 2018 #8
On top of that, others convinced her to forward it to the FBI, even though its author wanted privacy TheBlackAdder Sep 2018 #13
Per CNN she has had it since July mythology Sep 2018 #16
Unreal. So this is our leadership? jalan48 Sep 2018 #18
What don't we know, though? About this one thing, I mean. Hortensis Sep 2018 #33
Sad isn't it? jalan48 Sep 2018 #45
Yes. Narcissism as a sort of ultimate Dunning-Kruger. Hortensis Sep 2018 #46
Since July? I don't get this at all. Why didn't she grill him during the hearing... brush Sep 2018 #10
California Representative Anna Eshoo got the letter in July, and OnDoutside Sep 2018 #22
Rachel said last night she thought the white house staff is so leaky she was expecting a leak mucifer Sep 2018 #9
Unverified details in this Guardian piece Shrek Sep 2018 #12
There had better be more to it than that FBaggins Sep 2018 #19
Lawrence O'Donnell said he saw the letter. He let it slip it was sexual abuse related later in show. TheBlackAdder Sep 2018 #20
How would he see the letter when john657 Sep 2018 #27
When he opened his show, talking to Rachel, that's when he said it. Perhaps ask him. TheBlackAdder Sep 2018 #31
I'll do that. john657 Sep 2018 #34
Honestly, under most times the FBI couldn't investigate Lee-Lee Sep 2018 #14
Not true. It's their job to do background check. The crime would be state level, but FBI does check. TheBlackAdder Sep 2018 #21
Then perhaps DiFi should have provided it during the investigation FBaggins Sep 2018 #25
That's what I said Lee-Lee Sep 2018 #29
Have to agree with the FBI on this one sarisataka Sep 2018 #15
Channeling the Anita Hill - Clarence Thomas issue. Baitball Blogger Sep 2018 #17
I wonder if this will hurt Feinstein's re-election bid. Garrett78 Sep 2018 #23
No it won't. We're not electing a fucking criminal repuke. onecaliberal Sep 2018 #32
Her opponent is a Democrat FBaggins Sep 2018 #35
Kevin de Leon is her opponent. Garrett78 Sep 2018 #39
Yes, he's a California state Senator. He's an unknown in most parts of the state. onecaliberal Sep 2018 #40
But he's not a criminal repuke. And our state Democratic Party endorsed him. Garrett78 Sep 2018 #43
No he's not a criminal. My apologies. onecaliberal Sep 2018 #44
I guess they don't care SCVDem Sep 2018 #24
From the info we have right now, it looks a poor effort by Senate Dems. On so many levels, I hope OnDoutside Sep 2018 #26
Have to agree with you at this point. N/T john657 Sep 2018 #28
This was a Hail Mary pass eissa Sep 2018 #42
McConnell's rush job is not advise and consent, it's a whitewash bucolic_frolic Sep 2018 #38
This message was self-deleted by its author Pepsidog Sep 2018 #41
I get that the FBI wouldn't investigate this as a criminal matter BUT TomSlick Sep 2018 #47
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»FBI refuses to investigat...»Reply #10