Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

erronis

(15,241 posts)
Sat Sep 22, 2018, 07:39 PM Sep 2018

Bloomberg: Brett Kavanaugh Is Cursed Either Way [View all]

This is an exceptionally strong piece. I hope it presages the future.
https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-09-21/brett-kavanaugh-is-cursed-either-way

If he makes it to the Supreme Court without being cleared, his ordeal won't be over.


One way or another, Brett Kavanaugh will have to pay.

...

He will not necessarily pay explicitly for whatever it was he did or didn’t do on that contested night long ago. Although if Christine Blasey Ford appears to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee, and if she acquits herself credibly, then Kavanaugh is unlikely ever to sit on the Supreme Court – no matter what Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell says.

Kavanaugh can wait to see if Ford’s allegations fall apart under questioning. It’s possible she’ll prove a jumble of contradictions. But from what we know so far, it’s hard to imagine she would. Ford doesn’t have to be sure of the color of paint on the wall 35 years ago. She only needs to be sure of the details of the attack as she has already described it.

Conservatives viewing her actions as a product of Democratic skulduggery fool themselves. Her allegations were problematic for Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein, who first received them in confidence. If Democrats had plotted to weaponize the allegations for best effect, this late-inning muddle would not have resulted.

If McConnell is correct and Republicans manage to push Kavanaugh through to the high court, no matter what, Kavanaugh won’t be out of the woods.

This is not 1991, when Anita Hill accused soon-to-be Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas of sexual harassment. And Kavanaugh, the beneficiary of virtually every privilege that status and education can afford, is not Thomas.

Democrats in 1991 were already the party of feminists. But many of the Democratic men in Congress – Barbara Mikulski was the lone Democratic woman in the Senate – were just as doltish toward a female accuser as Republican senators are today.

That’s no longer the case. Democrats have four women on the Judiciary Committee, and the men are so different from the cast of 1991 that Senator Chris Coons of Delaware has publicly mused that maybe he should cede his committee time to his two female colleagues who are former prosecutors and superior interviewers.

More important, the Republican Party of 1991 is not the party of 2018. The party leader then was George H.W. Bush, a war hero with pronounced social graces. The current leader is a habitual liar and crude demagogue who has been accused of sexual predation by more than a dozen women while continuing to behave as cad-in-chief.

The GOP of 2018 views the Supreme Court differently as well. Republicans were not facing electoral attrition in those days, desperately trying to sabotage the future. Republicans had held the presidency for three terms and were on the verge of a historic victory in the House over a corrupt and complacent Democratic majority.

Now, Republicans are investing in a partisan court to deliver partisan outcomes to advance partisan goals that are insulated from democratic accountability, such as elections and popular opinion, which Republicans increasingly fear.

...
25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
That's what a lot of us are thinking! Good Cha Sep 2018 #1
This malaise Sep 2018 #2
K&R Scurrilous Sep 2018 #3
While Dr. Ford is in town, I hope so badly that she spooky3 Sep 2018 #4
Yes, yes, yes! Lonestarblue Sep 2018 #6
Preferably with a baseball bat. smirkymonkey Sep 2018 #17
+1 dalton99a Sep 2018 #21
Agreed FakeNoose Sep 2018 #5
He absolutely needs to be removed... LiberalFighter Sep 2018 #8
Only if we continue to ostensibly operate under rule of law quakerboy Sep 2018 #7
The ratings for this hearing will be YUGE! B Stieg Sep 2018 #9
The comparison with 1991 leaves out his perjury... JHB Sep 2018 #10
It should matter--it should've disqualified him from the get-go, but absolutely catbyte Sep 2018 #16
Whatever the outcome, this will happen in the coming week: Mr.Bill Sep 2018 #11
I know he's screwed with his wife for sure.... Kajun Gal Sep 2018 #12
Catholic -- probably not a divorce. But surely not happy. nt Hekate Sep 2018 #22
I so hope I'm wrong, but I believe McConnell--unless Murkowski & Collins can be shamed catbyte Sep 2018 #13
Dr Ford Has A Crack Legal Team DallasNE Sep 2018 #14
Not to mention if they do seat him we could see a SCOTUS judge indicted cstanleytech Sep 2018 #15
Fuck McConnell Frequency Kenneth Sep 2018 #18
no thanks. ewwwww. nt Grasswire2 Sep 2018 #24
As we now know, GHWB's "pronounced social graces" included groping women's buttocks. nt torius Sep 2018 #19
The pendulum always swings back bucolic_frolic Sep 2018 #20
and don't forget Avenatti - sounds like some women may have contacted him womanofthehills Sep 2018 #23
It would be hysterical if the women on the court Ilsa Sep 2018 #25
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bloomberg: Brett Kavanaug...