Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)A new study reveals the real reason Obama voters switched to Trump [View all]
White voters with racially conservative or anti-immigrant attitudes switched votes to Trump at a higher rate than those with more liberal views on these issues, the papers authors write. We find little evidence that economic dislocation and marginality were significantly related to vote switching in 2016.
This new paper fits with a sizeable slate of studies conducted over the past 18 months or so, most of which have come to the same conclusions: There is tremendous evidence that Trump voters were motivated by racial resentment (as well as hostile sexism), and very little evidence that economic stress had anything to do with it.
............................................................................................
We find a much stronger association between symbolic racial and immigration attitudes and switching for Trump and Clinton than between economic marginality or local economic dislocation and vote switching, Reny et al. write. In fact, we find marginally small or no associations between any of our economic indicators and vote switching in either direction.
............................................................................................
Now, Reny et al.s statistical analysis cant show all of this on its own. You should never draw conclusions this large from one statistical analysis, as it could suffer from any number of problems.
However, this analysis of the election is supported by a wide and deep body of research, the vast majority of which shows that concerns about identity and race were the decisive issues in the 2016 election. This was true in the Republican primary and the general; its also consistent with research on far-right parties in Europe whose xenophobic appeals are similar to Trumps. There is a complete lack of statistical evidence, by contrast, for the economic anxiety theory.
................................................................................................
.....................................................................................
But its plausible, and theres no use burying our heads in the sand by pretending this is about class when it isnt.
This new paper fits with a sizeable slate of studies conducted over the past 18 months or so, most of which have come to the same conclusions: There is tremendous evidence that Trump voters were motivated by racial resentment (as well as hostile sexism), and very little evidence that economic stress had anything to do with it.
............................................................................................
We find a much stronger association between symbolic racial and immigration attitudes and switching for Trump and Clinton than between economic marginality or local economic dislocation and vote switching, Reny et al. write. In fact, we find marginally small or no associations between any of our economic indicators and vote switching in either direction.
............................................................................................
Now, Reny et al.s statistical analysis cant show all of this on its own. You should never draw conclusions this large from one statistical analysis, as it could suffer from any number of problems.
However, this analysis of the election is supported by a wide and deep body of research, the vast majority of which shows that concerns about identity and race were the decisive issues in the 2016 election. This was true in the Republican primary and the general; its also consistent with research on far-right parties in Europe whose xenophobic appeals are similar to Trumps. There is a complete lack of statistical evidence, by contrast, for the economic anxiety theory.
................................................................................................
History suggests that significant changes in voting across party lines, particularly for the presidency, precede changes in party identities, the basis for realignments. This sequence of events played out during the Southern realignment (i.e., Democrats voting for GOP presidential candidates but maintaining their party attachment) and here we provide evidence that it may be happening again after two terms with a black president and during an era of mass demographic change due to immigration. Racial conservatives and those with the most punitive immigration views are moving right and were the most likely to switch to Trump in 2016. Our data suggest the same is happening in the opposite direction as those with racially liberal or pro-immigration views may be sorting into the Democratic Party.
.....................................................................................
But its plausible, and theres no use burying our heads in the sand by pretending this is about class when it isnt.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/10/16/17980820/trump-obama-2016-race-racism-class-economy-2018-midterm
Direct link to study:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/qphz9lxy6pxni1k/final_submission_reny_etal_poq_public.pdf?dl=0
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
68 replies, 6544 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (35)
ReplyReply to this post
68 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Indeed. Dismissing racism and misogyny as "identity politics" is dead wrong. (nt)
ehrnst
Oct 2018
#4
So the bigots that voted for Obama switched to Trump? Doesn't that prompt you to ask...
thesquanderer
Oct 2018
#27
Anybody can see that Trump is only out to help white billionaires and hurt everybody else.
lagomorph777
Oct 2018
#8
No amount of increased income for white men will change their racism/nationalism. (nt)
ehrnst
Oct 2018
#6
That is the truth, ehrnst. They could be dirt poor & living a squalid existance & they'd still
Bfd
Oct 2018
#9
Yep. It was a battle of record high negative approval ratings among registered voters.
Hassin Bin Sober
Oct 2018
#28
It was also a battle involving a candidate who was super popular just a few years earlier.
StevieM
Oct 2018
#36
None of this would have mattered had it not been for Comey's repeated interference. (eom)
StevieM
Oct 2018
#37
I don't doubt that voters switched. But this article ignores the effect of Comey and the FBI
StevieM
Oct 2018
#42
Repugism is a big tent - it includes white nationalists, Nazis, KKK, skinheads, militias &
lark
Oct 2018
#33
Well, yes. For White Straight men, there is no problem that can't be solved with more money.
ehrnst
Oct 2018
#58