Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

fescuerescue

(4,448 posts)

23. It seems like however

Reply to jberryhill (Original post)

Sat Oct 27, 2018, 10:00 AM

Oct 2018

That if the bombs did detonate and harm people or property, that there would be additional charges beyond this one.

Such as murder, assassination or destruction of Federal or property. Those certainly have additional charges and jail time or worse. Tim Mcvee is unavailable to comment on this for example.

Your post does help explain why I keep see the news media saying he could get a max of 45 years which seems very light to me.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

23 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The "one stop" WHY IT DOES NOT MATTER IF IT WAS A FAKE BOMB thread [View all] jberryhill Oct 2018 OP

It's "OK" to intimidate people these days. joshcryer Oct 2018 #1

Intended To Detonate? ProfessorGAC Oct 2018 #2

Like the Shoebomber, for example htuttle Oct 2018 #6

He wasn't smart enough to build a dummy bomb world wide wally Oct 2018 #3

They were explosives people Oct 2018 #4

Once again jberryhill Oct 2018 #15

I've been beating back the "Fake Bomb" assertion for days. maxsolomon Oct 2018 #5

No he isn't a professional, but sometimes amateurs get it right. sarge43 Oct 2018 #13

Legally not yet charged with attempted murder Midnightwalk Oct 2018 #7

He will NEVER be charged by the feds for attempted murder jberryhill Oct 2018 #16

He sent these devices through the US mail. blogslut Oct 2018 #19

That is in fact one of the charges filed localroger Oct 2018 #22

I didn't say he could be charged Midnightwalk Oct 2018 #20

The bomb was not fake, so I don't understand your headline Kingofalldems Oct 2018 #8

+1 SunSeeker Oct 2018 #11

It was not "fake" in the sense that it was a real devixe jberryhill Oct 2018 #18

KnR Hugin Oct 2018 #9

"It has puzzled me that people think it matters one way or the other..." OilemFirchen Oct 2018 #10

Because it was an observation of why a clock would be on a mail bomb like that jberryhill Oct 2018 #17

I think they started arguing "fake bomb" under the original "false flag" theory. pnwmom Oct 2018 #12

Come next month can you fill us in on why it doesn't matter if he was a fake president? ProudLib72 Oct 2018 #14

Ah, that's for the folks who subscribe... jberryhill Oct 2018 #21

It seems like however fescuerescue Oct 2018 #23