General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Uh, oh...this can't be good [View all]progressoid
(49,969 posts)Brooks Schott states in the documents that he met Pressler in 2016, after Schott was hired as a lawyer at the firm Pressler co-founded with Woodfill.
Schott says he was invited to lunch by Pressler in December 2016. He arrived at Presslers home, he says, where he was greeted by Pressler, who was not wearing pants. After dressing, Pressler gave Schott a tour of his office and mentioned a 10-person hot tub at his ranch.
Pressler then told me that when the ladies are not around, us boys all go in the hot tub completely naked, Schotts affidavit states. He then invited me to go hot tubbing with him at his ranch. This invitation was clearly made in anticipation that I would engage in sexual activity.
Upon returning to the firm, Schott said an office manager told him that Pressler had previously solicited young men at the firm. Schott then complained to Woodfill, according to emails that were filed with his affidavit.
If (the office manager) knew of Presslers past inappropriate sexual behavior, I find it hard to believe that you did not know about it, he wrote in a Dec. 9, 2016 email to Woodfill, court records show.
Woodfill responded that Pressler was no longer his law partner and that this 85-year-old man has never made any inappropriate comments or actions toward me or any one I know of, court records show. In a subsequent email, Woodfill said that the conduct Schott described is unacceptable and said he would address it with Pressler.
In an email on Thursday, Woodfill responded to Schotts assertion, writing that the person described in Mr. Schotts affidavit doesnt match up with the Judge Pressler I know and that Pressler has not been associated with my law firm for over a decade.