Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(50,884 posts)

10. He was only reading the first situation that could be treason.

Wed Dec 19, 2018, 12:43 AM

Dec 2018

He didn't go past the or in the section.

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Google treason and the first article was about trump. [View all] liberal N proud Dec 2018 OP

O'Donnell argued that treason can only occur with "declared war". triron Dec 2018 #1

I've read the case law O'Donnell referenced. TomSlick Dec 2018 #7

Yeah I admit we're just quibbling. triron Dec 2018 #8

I'm a lawyer. I live to quibble. TomSlick Dec 2018 #13

He was only reading the first situation that could be treason. LiberalFighter Dec 2018 #10

Yes I saw Meacham this morning and it makes you go hmmmmmm. nt UniteFightBack Dec 2018 #2

So what did he say? triron Dec 2018 #4

It's in the link in the OP but here is a snip..... UniteFightBack Dec 2018 #5

First idiot, now treason jberryhill Dec 2018 #3

I just rechecked the Constitution and I disagree with O'Donnell LiberalFighter Dec 2018 #9

I understand that. But nothing stated specifically about war. LiberalFighter Dec 2018 #12