General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Unlike several posting here this evening, I don't KNOW exactly what the statement from the [View all]mentalslavery
(463 posts)he stood by his story that Karl Rove had been indicted in May in a sealed indictment and that Fitz was gonna unseal the indictment (Fitzmas) and that Rove was resigning in the wake of the soon to be unsealing of the indictment.
https://archive.is/20130202023036/http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2006/06/13/interview/print.html?blog=/politics/war_room/2006/06/13/interview/index.html
Also, a key context to this situation is that at the time jason said, "Until Fitz releases a statement denying that Rove has been indicted, I stand by my reporting". Hmmmnnn, maybe thats why Mueller IMMEDIATELY denied the accuracy of the claims???
Additionally, there is a wealth of reporting on this shady reporter and he has a history of "getting out over his ski's" on reporting or admittedly "just falsifying reports".
Furthermore, your right! Bob Mueller does have the answers and he released a statement yesterday saying that "buzzfeeds story is not accurate". So, it is a little strange that you would say that Mueller is the only one that knows and then deny what he knows. What else do you need?!?
We, on the left, can not get so caught up on what we want...(i really want it to be true toooooo!) cuz we fall into the same traps the right lays for their base.
Lastly, back in the Fitzmas days jason was all "Im not gonna reveal my sources even if it turns out I was burned" and before that he falsely reported information on an enron story claiming that he "had email verification of the information" only later to admit he could not produce the email. He was fired for that. I wonder if he will reveal his sources now considering he has be called out again......?!?