Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
9. Barela is pursuing arbitration
Wed Jan 23, 2019, 12:41 PM
Jan 2019

...which is likely in the dispute provision of his engagement agreement, or they have otherwise agreed to arbitrate. In that circumstance, I don't know whether the arbitrator would make a referral to Calbar or not.

Certainly, if he was lying to his client about having received the settlement, and was using money from the IOLTA account to fund general operations and expenses, then he's done.

It seems odd that the other party would have said that they paid Avenatti, and produced wire transfer receipts to Avenatti's IOLTA account, if its some kind of elaborate hoax.

My theory:

Whatever went on between Barela and the other party must be potentially embarrassing enough to Barela that he would be disinclined to pursue an action to enforce the settlement, and was able to be mollified long enough by the "slow pay" story. Most of Avenatti's problems, IMHO, stem from that large judgment he got in district court against Kimberly Clark for something like $450 million, which was later cut to $20 million and even that was still on appeal. That's from memory, but the basic idea is that he probably did a lot of chicken-counting before those eggs were hatched, and then developed some creative strategies for the fallout.

It also explains how he's avoided attachment of all kinds of things from the former partner, who is still looking to collect on the judgments in his favor, and the various aggrieved parties arising from the Tully's Coffee shitshow.

But playing games with client funds is, as you know, the chart-topping reason for attorney disbarment and other discipline, by far. If you are fond of reading attorney discipline cases, it never starts out as "I'm going to steal from my clients" but is precipitated by other problems arising from character flaws.

You don't "borrow" from the IOLTA account. You track every payment in and out. You inform the client immediately upon receipt or disbursement of funds, and you send an invoice recording every transaction involving the IOLTA account.

The dispute here is going to be pretty simple to figure out.
Yikes. This is the sort of shit that gets lawyers disbarred. The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2019 #1
Barela is pursuing arbitration jberryhill Jan 2019 #9
Barela sounds like a dodgy character himself, The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2019 #11
But he's a fighter! LuvLoogie Jan 2019 #2
If true, this is cause for disbarment. Sanity Claws Jan 2019 #3
Isn't this the sort of thing that gets you disbarred? Indicted, even? TreasonousBastard Jan 2019 #4
#1 reason for disbarment jberryhill Jan 2019 #10
Is that Orly Taitz? The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2019 #15
The one and only... jberryhill Jan 2019 #16
Did she go back to being a dentist The Truth Is Here Jan 2019 #18
It appears that she is now working as a full-time lunatic and conspiracy theorist. The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2019 #20
I remain skeptical of Mr. Avenatti. LuvLoogie Jan 2019 #5
I am not surprised. still_one Jan 2019 #6
Avenatti has already done all I needed malaise Jan 2019 #7
Yeah he really helped blow that up....and Stormy. nt UniteFightBack Jan 2019 #25
Blows my mind that anybody thought this con man ought to run for president. The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2019 #8
I like Michael Avenatti. Saboburns Jan 2019 #12
You really shouldn't. A lawyer who takes money from his client's trust account The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2019 #13
I agree completely with you here. Saboburns Jan 2019 #17
BTW I don't like Avenatti because he stirred up shit. Saboburns Jan 2019 #19
One of the most important characteristics of a con man is The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2019 #21
As I see it. Saboburns Jan 2019 #22
If he did anything his client did not know about, direct or approve, he violated his duty to her. The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2019 #23
er,um Yes Saboburns Jan 2019 #24
Excellent. Kingofalldems Jan 2019 #14
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Former Client Accuses Mic...»Reply #9