Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Former Client Accuses Michael Avenatti of Operating Law Firm Like a 'Ponzi Scheme' [View all]jberryhill
(62,444 posts)9. Barela is pursuing arbitration
...which is likely in the dispute provision of his engagement agreement, or they have otherwise agreed to arbitrate. In that circumstance, I don't know whether the arbitrator would make a referral to Calbar or not.
Certainly, if he was lying to his client about having received the settlement, and was using money from the IOLTA account to fund general operations and expenses, then he's done.
It seems odd that the other party would have said that they paid Avenatti, and produced wire transfer receipts to Avenatti's IOLTA account, if its some kind of elaborate hoax.
My theory:
Whatever went on between Barela and the other party must be potentially embarrassing enough to Barela that he would be disinclined to pursue an action to enforce the settlement, and was able to be mollified long enough by the "slow pay" story. Most of Avenatti's problems, IMHO, stem from that large judgment he got in district court against Kimberly Clark for something like $450 million, which was later cut to $20 million and even that was still on appeal. That's from memory, but the basic idea is that he probably did a lot of chicken-counting before those eggs were hatched, and then developed some creative strategies for the fallout.
It also explains how he's avoided attachment of all kinds of things from the former partner, who is still looking to collect on the judgments in his favor, and the various aggrieved parties arising from the Tully's Coffee shitshow.
But playing games with client funds is, as you know, the chart-topping reason for attorney disbarment and other discipline, by far. If you are fond of reading attorney discipline cases, it never starts out as "I'm going to steal from my clients" but is precipitated by other problems arising from character flaws.
You don't "borrow" from the IOLTA account. You track every payment in and out. You inform the client immediately upon receipt or disbursement of funds, and you send an invoice recording every transaction involving the IOLTA account.
The dispute here is going to be pretty simple to figure out.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
25 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Former Client Accuses Michael Avenatti of Operating Law Firm Like a 'Ponzi Scheme' [View all]
jberryhill
Jan 2019
OP
It appears that she is now working as a full-time lunatic and conspiracy theorist.
The Velveteen Ocelot
Jan 2019
#20
Blows my mind that anybody thought this con man ought to run for president.
The Velveteen Ocelot
Jan 2019
#8
You really shouldn't. A lawyer who takes money from his client's trust account
The Velveteen Ocelot
Jan 2019
#13
If he did anything his client did not know about, direct or approve, he violated his duty to her.
The Velveteen Ocelot
Jan 2019
#23