General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: U heard it here 1st: Biden/Harris vs. Kasich/Haley [View all]shanny
(6,709 posts)and went into the implications down the road:
http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/01/2020-primary-biden-and-betos-aid-to-gop-candidates-in-2018-is-disqualifying.html
Ultimately, what makes Biden and ORourkes conduct disqualifying is not the effect it may (or may not) have had in 2018, but rather, what it says about how they will govern in 2021. If Democrats want to treat climate change as an existential threat and health care and the franchise as inalienable rights then they will need to treat the Republican Party as an enemy.
Bipartisan overtures will never persuade congressional Republicans to vote against the interests of fossil fuel companies, or back dramatic expansions in public health insurance, or dismantle election laws that give their coalition wildly disproportionate power. Only a unified, Democratic government that is willing to ruthlessly prioritize ideological goals over bipartisan comity will have any chance of overcoming our legislative systems copious veto points, and passing anything resembling a proportionate response to our nations climate, health-care, and democratic crises into law.
Our country paid a big price for the Democrats failure to do this the last time around. Had 51 Senate Democrats been willing to kill the legislative filibuster in 2009, they could have passed cap-and-trade, a version of the ACA that included a public option, a stimulus package proportional to the severity of the Great Recession, more foreclosure relief, card check for unions, and citizenship for all 11 million undocumented immigrants on a party-line vote. In so doing, they quite likely would have prevented Donald Trump from ever becoming president; add a few million more immigrants to the electorate and a couple percentage points to the rate of private-sector unionization and you end up with a country that is both more democratic and more Democratic.