General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Studies showing "benefits of circumcision" highly flawed [View all]Confusious
(8,317 posts)You can do medicine, rocket science, physics, and everything in between, becuase you command LOGIC.
He can't even do math.
"What does the frequently cited 60% relative reduction in HIV infections actually mean?"
He subtracts numbers when he should be dividing numbers.
If he can't even do math, he really has no business criticizing the study.
Critical thinking doesn't involve agreeing with everything you post, or everyone and everything you agree with. Critical thinking involves calling bullshit when you see it it.
And I'm calling bullshit.
(besides which, speaking of biases, according to an earlier post, seems he doesn't agree with circumsion, so his analysis is already suspect. (a little more critical thinking))
I addressed your claim of ad hominem down below, I fully expect you to ignore it and disagree with it.
He agrees with you, so he must be right, right?