Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

VOX

(22,976 posts)
24. Thanks, friend. The matter needs to be drilled repeatedly.
Fri Mar 8, 2019, 04:42 PM
Mar 2019

Democrats/progressives should have seen this coming from miles off. Every warning siren, flashing light and whistle on Judge Ellis was perceptible long before this week’s Manafort “sentencing.”

Glowing sore-thumb examples were abundant, such as this piece found in The NY Times LAST AUGUST:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2018/08/09/us/politics/judge-ellis-manafort-trial.amp.html
Manafort’s Judge, T.S. Ellis, Is a ‘Caesar’ in His Own Rome
The New York Times
By Emily Cochrane and Sharon LaFraniere
Aug. 9, 2018
ALEXANDRIA, Va. — Judge T. S. Ellis III had dismissed the jury for the day, but he was not quite finished opining about what he saw as irrelevant and repetitive questioning of a witness in the financial fraud trial of Paul Manafort.

Standing up so as to loom even larger over the courtroom, he angrily confronted Greg D. Andres, the lead prosecutor.

“Look at me,” the judge demanded, slamming his hand on the wooden ledge. “When you look down, it’s as if to say, you know, that’s B.S., I don’t want to listen to any more from you.”

“Don’t look down. Don’t roll your eyes,” he told Mr. Andres.

And so for the second time that afternoon, the prosecutor had to try to convince the judge that he only looked down because otherwise, he said, he would “be yelled at again by the Court” for his facial expression when “I’m not doing anything wrong, but trying my case.”

Judge Ellis, 78, is the formidable ringmaster of the greatest show in the United States District Court in Alexandria, Va., demanding both precise questioning and a breakneck pace in the trial of Mr. Manafort, President Trump’s former campaign chairman.

He has routinely broken in on questioning, limited admission of evidence and exhorted lawyers to “expedite” — all the while entertaining spectators with humorous asides about his age, his wife, his Navy past, his lack of an email address, the jury’s lunch menu, split infinitives and the noise produced by a machine intended to keep bench conferences from being overheard (like “the sound of waves crashing”).

An appointee of President Ronald Reagan, he has pushed the customary limits of judicial intervention so far that Mr. Andres at one point seemed to suggest the prosecution had grounds to appeal. After the prosecutor complained Monday about the number of times “your honor stops us and asks us to move on,” the judge declared that he would stand by the record.

“I will stand by the record, as well,” Mr. Andres responded.

“Then you will lose,” Judge Ellis said.
<snip>
Whatever criticism he has faced does not seem to have fazed Judge Ellis at all in his conduct of Mr. Manafort’s trial, the first to consider charges stemming from the investigation led by Robert S. Mueller III, the special counsel.

“I am a Caesar in my own Rome,” he said at one point...
<snip>
To the jurors, the judge could not be more solicitous, joking about the plain lunch menu (“You won’t find baked alaska”). At least the meal is free, he told the jurors on opening day, saying he hoped no one had a fleeting urge to “slit their wrists” because they had been unfortunate enough to be picked from the jury pool.

He has clearly reveled in his captive audience. “My hearing is not what it once was,” he said last week, pausing for a beat with comic effect. “Nothing is what it once was.” Born in Bogotá, Colombia, he took the opportunity during a sentencing to display his fluency in Spanish, questioning the defendant himself while an interpreter stood by.
<snip>
During the Manafort trial, his exchanges with Mr. Andres have repeatedly escalated into barbed remarks and angry retorts — a tense dynamic that has riveted spectators.

“I’m never patient, but you must be,” Judge Ellis warned the prosecutor last week.

“No comment,” Mr. Andres said.

“That was a comment,” the judge said. “I have a long memory.”

When Mr. Andres was looking for a document, Judge Ellis suggested he was several steps ahead of him. “I didn’t need to have it. At least not as much as you do.”

He also expressed disappointment when Mr. Andres took over questioning from Uzo Asonye, an assistant federal prosecutor on Mr. Andres’s team. “I was hoping you would stick with that,” he said as Mr. Asonye ceded the floor to Mr. Andres...

“That’s a great question, judge,” Mr. Andres said Tuesday after the judge rephrased one of his questions to the prosecution’s marquee witness, Rick Gates. “Thank you.”

Judge Ellis’s response to the compliment was barbed, but only mildly. “They don’t pay me nearly as much as they pay you,” he said.



Trump began this nonsense Amyishere Mar 2019 #1
Trump was right. mr_liberal Mar 2019 #2
Sadly this is a fact. That is why lawyers shop around for the best venue for their case. SunSeeker Mar 2019 #3
After the Manafort sentencing pressbox69 Mar 2019 #4
Obama had a SCOTUS judge pick IGNORED. Democrats got ZERO from that "choice." VOX Mar 2019 #8
Well said! Brawndo Mar 2019 #20
Thanks. VOX Mar 2019 #21
Sure! You bring up a point worth repeating Brawndo Mar 2019 #23
Thanks, friend. The matter needs to be drilled repeatedly. VOX Mar 2019 #24
No, Republicans choose conservatives, Democrats choose non-conservatives JHB Mar 2019 #12
Dems tend just appoint judges who follow the law. SunSeeker Mar 2019 #14
oh come on fescuerescue Mar 2019 #15
"Everybody" does not know that. One side actively cultivates a farm team... JHB Mar 2019 #18
ok fescuerescue Mar 2019 #19
Please refrain from taking my point to absurd extremes JHB Mar 2019 #22
Respectfully, I thought the original point was a bit absurb. fescuerescue Mar 2019 #25
Conservatives have made ideological "correctness" mandatory for... JHB Mar 2019 #5
This sentence given Manafort duforsure Mar 2019 #6
Judges by law are supposed to be non-partisan. Chin music Mar 2019 #7
Ideally, yes, but many judges no longer adhere to impartiality in real life. VOX Mar 2019 #9
Don't mistake partisanship for weirdness theboss Mar 2019 #17
Yes. I know. Chin music Mar 2019 #26
regardless of any of that, what the judge did in this case is fucked up in itself JI7 Mar 2019 #10
I'm thinking it is only important to know that Ellis was appointed by Reagan because Silver Gaia Mar 2019 #11
Vinca may have the answer to this: Lars39 Mar 2019 #13
I think people misapply political philosphies to criminal law. theboss Mar 2019 #16
Ellis, Judge Boof, Gorsucks et al are all politicians in robes. Some, like Ellis are Hassler Mar 2019 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We do not have Obama judg...»Reply #24