Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
10. Are you saying that Speaker Pelosi is "sitting idly by while a veritable fountain of hate
Fri Mar 15, 2019, 11:17 AM
Mar 2019

and xenophobia was permitted to spew its filth into our garden?"

The electoral college put him there, and the constitution makes it very hard to remove a sitting POTUS, and that permits him to continue, not Speaker Pelosi.

If you have a way to prevent him from going on twitter and on television, by all means, share it with us. But I think that Madame Speaker would have done it if it was possible, despite what you seem to think.

What effect would a futile impeachment hearing do other than take time away from actual investigations that would give us actual evidence to impeach him with or threaten him? Please share that with us.

Did you forget that we have barely started this session after a 31 day shutdown? It took two YEARS to investigate Nixon.

You're mad. I dig. But you're aiming your rage at the wrong person. Don't confuse general frustration with the world, and disliking someone with them not doing their job.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»With all due respect, Mad...»Reply #10