Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)The Republican campaign to impose work requirements on Medicaid recipients is working as expected. [View all]
?resize=4098Elizabeth Cloinger, 47, who lives in a trailer next to her cousins house just outside town, thought she was complying with the new rules. She has been on Medicaid for years and already had a job, working seven days most weeks as a home health aide. Her wages 9.25 an hour, with 50 cents more for hospice patients and her hours met the new rules. Yet she received a June letter saying she needed to verify that her income made her eligible, or she would be cut off.
She called the listed phone number and faxed information to a state employee in Pine Bluff. She was told that, like many people, she was exempt from the work requirements in her case, because she was caring for her 20-year-old daughter recovering from a car accident and her 3-year-old granddaughter.
But on Aug. 18, she received another letter, saying she had been terminated because she had not verified her income. In December, four letters arrived saying she needed to update her email address, then 11 more in January. Each letter told her to create an online account. She doesnt have a computer and didnt realize that the program requires everyone to get an email address. This winter, she applied to get her insurance back and is still waiting for an answer. Statewide, about 1,900 of the 18,000 people cut off last year have regained coverage since January, when they could reapply. The state does not keep track of how many reapplied and were denied.
Being poor in this country is not only cruel and degrading, it's also been made insanely complicated. All of these qualities are deliberately created hardships courtesy of a political class for whom poverty is barely an issue any more. Poor people are always an issue, though. They're stealing Your Money and spending it on T-bones and Cadillacs. Poor people are convenient scapegoats. It's only poverty that's inconvenient.
https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a26964879/medicaid-work-requirements-arkansas-republicans/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
63 replies, 9914 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (155)
ReplyReply to this post
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Republican campaign to impose work requirements on Medicaid recipients is working as expected. [View all]
Demovictory9
Mar 2019
OP
K&R. All of those things, like the needing to create an email account, are features and not bugs
ck4829
Mar 2019
#2
The uber rich RepubliCON oligarchs purposely make the whole process complicated, inept and corrupt
Farmer-Rick
Mar 2019
#3
When one is poor, the added expense of a computer is a burden. Not everyone is near a library to
monmouth4
Mar 2019
#4
Or as the woman in the article is working 7 days a week and caretaker for her daughter
csziggy
Apr 2019
#62
+1, computer's are not telephones. Matter of fact give a kid today a turn dial telephone and
uponit7771
Apr 2019
#47
I generally temper my language on here, just because. But....."What a bunch of rotten, greedy,
dameatball
Mar 2019
#14
yes. and she's taking care of a disabled person and toddler. Not so easy to run back and forth
Demovictory9
Mar 2019
#16
in some states, the repubs tried to include rules that impacted whites and blacks differently
Demovictory9
Mar 2019
#20
as I recall, the rules referred to density of population.... so rural folks would be exempt
Demovictory9
Mar 2019
#26
Apparently being poor in this country is a crime, but being a wealthy traitor is admirable ?
Hekate
Mar 2019
#18