Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Nancy will have to give this some consideration. There is no way she CAN miss this... hlthe2b Jun 2019 #1
I'm sure she's considering it. I wouldn't be surprised if she's discussed it with Tribe privately StarfishSaver Jun 2019 #4
He's gotten feedback from experienced politicos though, so I don't think he's speaking through a hlthe2b Jun 2019 #5
Sure - I'm not saying his political view isn't well-founded. As I said, he has a lot of political StarfishSaver Jun 2019 #7
"political ramifications" ?? It is SO not about Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2019 #26
Litman and Tribe were just on MSNBC's "All In". BigmanPigman Jun 2019 #2
Tribe was on MSNBC just a few minutes ago. The way he explained his idea was not for the House napi21 Jun 2019 #3
It is more than censure though. It would be full investigational hearings resulting in "findings" hlthe2b Jun 2019 #6
Which will never happen FBaggins Jun 2019 #9
House Republicans are not in control. hlthe2b Jun 2019 #10
In this case, neither are House Democrats FBaggins Jun 2019 #13
In fact they can. If you know more than Laurence Tribe, Neal Katayal,, Norm Eisen, hlthe2b Jun 2019 #16
Laughable FBaggins Jun 2019 #20
still waiting for those creds... hlthe2b Jun 2019 #21
" doesn't fit nicely within any of Congress's Article I powers." FBaggins Jun 2019 #24
Article 1 powers. PERIOD. hlthe2b Jun 2019 #25
Such an odd argument FBaggins Jun 2019 #27
No. You are not worth my time. hlthe2b Jun 2019 #28
Contradicted by your compulsive need to reply FBaggins Jun 2019 #32
Hmmm FBaggins says they can't do it; Tribe says they can. Cuthbert Allgood Jun 2019 #17
LOL... Gee, ya think? hlthe2b Jun 2019 #22
No... Tribe doesn't say they can FBaggins Jun 2019 #23
He absolutely says they can. Cuthbert Allgood Jun 2019 #34
This path seems to frighten some here. nt Grasswire2 Jun 2019 #38
So, we'll be satisfied with just hurting his feelings? FiveGoodMen Jun 2019 #45
Do our Dem leaders in the House know this? Why haven't they mentioned this before? Honeycombe8 Jun 2019 #8
What would a "Sense of the House" mean to the general public? Martin Eden Jun 2019 #11
They complete the process they can decide then whether to refer articles of impeachment... hlthe2b Jun 2019 #12
A conclusion of guilt demands impeachment Martin Eden Jun 2019 #15
The opinion piece has been posted her numerous times. You need to read it hlthe2b Jun 2019 #18
This process would bring everything out, plus Cuthbert Allgood Jun 2019 #19
Wouldn't that be equally apparent if the House impeached and the Senate acquitted? onenote Jun 2019 #31
Sure, but the House doesn't need to give the Senate the chance to acquit. Cuthbert Allgood Jun 2019 #35
Which will simply allow the repubs to change the subject from the findings to the failure to follow onenote Jun 2019 #37
Agreed. onenote Jun 2019 #30
Love this line Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2019 #14
K & R Duppers Jun 2019 #29
The most important thing is to get National MSM coverage. Ligyron Jun 2019 #33
I can honestly think of nothing worse than the house making the case hughee99 Jun 2019 #36
that's the point of this path Grasswire2 Jun 2019 #39
If you want it to be as open and public as possible, you send the charges to the Senate and have an hughee99 Jun 2019 #40
The House would impeach. Cuthbert Allgood Jun 2019 #41
If the house doesn't bring charges to the senate, hughee99 Jun 2019 #42
Yes. The House impeaches regardless of what the Senate does. Cuthbert Allgood Jun 2019 #43
That's not exactly what Tribe is recommending... hughee99 Jun 2019 #44
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Harry Litman approves Law...»Reply #31