Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)

11. Of course, you can decide what your OP is about. But if you post incomplete or misleading info,

Reply to Atticus (Reply #10)

Sun Jun 16, 2019, 08:23 PM

Jun 2019

you shouldn't be surprised or ticked off if you're called on it and corrected.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

As stated in the intro to the Mueller Report, the investigators analyzed [View all] Atticus Jun 2019 OP

Mueller spent a lot of time contorting his findings regarding Russia to let Hoyt Jun 2019 #1

Tend to agree except I still think Mueller needs to go before congress, publicly. triron Jun 2019 #3

Maybe. But Mueller has had plenty of opportunity to speak up, and he hasn't. Hoyt Jun 2019 #4

Conspiracy: elleng Jun 2019 #2

Please see #7 below. nt Atticus Jun 2019 #8

They don't look at dictionaries ilmare2000 Jun 2019 #5

It's more complicated than that StarfishSaver Jun 2019 #6

My post did not mention "conspiracy". It dealt solely with how the Mueller Report Atticus Jun 2019 #7

Your post didn't mention conspiracy, but the portion you selectively quoted from did StarfishSaver Jun 2019 #9

This could go on forever if you keep moving the goalposts. Here I thought I could decide Atticus Jun 2019 #10

Of course, you can decide what your OP is about. But if you post incomplete or misleading info, StarfishSaver Jun 2019 #11

But there isn't a law against coordination or collusion. There is a conspiracy law, and that law pnwmom Jun 2019 #12

Agree with your entire post. But, that was not the subject of my post. Atticus Jun 2019 #13

I'm not sure that even if he had accepted your definition, that it could have changed the outcome. pnwmom Jun 2019 #14

All that is clear from the report is that in some way, Mueller's finding "no coordination" Atticus Jun 2019 #15

Mueller was using the term "coordination" to mean an agreement, and the agreement pnwmom Jun 2019 #16

If coordination and agreement were synonyms, that would make sense. nt Atticus Jun 2019 #17

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»As stated in the intro to...»Reply #11