Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So Adam Schiff says no question Iran behind the attacks [View all]brooklynite
(94,302 posts)34. It may be that one faction in Iran wants to stop another faction from negotiating
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
He's on the Intelligence Committee so he has access to better sources than we do.
The Velveteen Ocelot
Jun 2019
#4
Except that wasn't the question. What should or could we do regardless of its validity
still_one
Jun 2019
#37
I hear you Ford, and you are right, they Bolton's are going to keep on trying, I just don't think it
still_one
Jun 2019
#42
Do Japan and Germany have access to the same intelligence as Schiff?
The Velveteen Ocelot
Jun 2019
#10
But the possibility that Iran is involved should also be considered.
The Velveteen Ocelot
Jun 2019
#23
when it comes to interventionist foreign policy, both parties (albeit from completely different
Celerity
Jun 2019
#47
Lots of regional players have a stake in ginning up a US invasion of Iran.
Ford_Prefect
Jun 2019
#29
It may be that one faction in Iran wants to stop another faction from negotiating
brooklynite
Jun 2019
#34
Well, I for one will rely on the opinion of the Chair of the House Intel Committee...
brooklynite
Jun 2019
#36