General Discussion

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)

16. I'm sorry but you do not know what you are talking about

Wed Jul 10, 2019, 11:21 AM

Jul 2019

And you are misrepresenting what is at the link you posted.

She made no physical appearance in any court whatsoever. The link you posted does not claim that anyone showed up in court. It refers to filings made solely on paper.

She "appeared" solely on paper. She never actually showed up in any court at all. The link you posted does not support the false premise you are making.

This is the complete docket for the CA case:

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4154484/katie-johnson-v-donald-j-trump/

The only thing that happened was that papers were filed, and mail from the court to the fictitious mailing address bounced:

7
May 9, 2016
Mail Returned (RTS unable to forward) addressed to Katie Johnson 6634 Desert Queen Ave. Twentynine Palms, CA 9227

There was not a single hearing held in that case. No one showed up at court, and mail to the plaintiff bounced.

This is the complete docket for the NY case:

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4524664/doe-v-trump/

Papers filed in September, attorney pro hac vice motions submitted, case withdrawn in November.

Neither case reached any stage at which anyone showed up in court. That's a simple fact. Whether you choose to believe in reality is up to you.

Again, could you please tell me what it is that the "Justice for Katie" website is collecting money to do?

If she "withdrew after she claims she was threatened" then why is her website still up? She didn't get threatened into shutting that down? They said "You have to withdraw the lawsuit, but the website is fine"?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

91 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Katie Johnson video re: grooming by Epstein and rape by Trump [View all] Chalco Jul 2019 OP

Kick dalton99a Jul 2019 #1

Thanks for posting FakeNoose Jul 2019 #2

Thank you. I don't really know if I can stomach the video. smirkymonkey Jul 2019 #4

Monsters. All in cahoots together. BlancheSplanchnik Jul 2019 #21

Is this a recent video, or has this been out for a while? See the VOX article. Fla Dem Jul 2019 #3

It is the original video that was shopped around by a Jerry Springer producer... jberryhill Jul 2019 #7

This women swore in court to the facts in this video Johnny2X2X Jul 2019 #8

First off, she never made an appearance in any court jberryhill Jul 2019 #12

Wrong Johnny2X2X Jul 2019 #14

I'm sorry but you do not know what you are talking about jberryhill Jul 2019 #16

I don't have to answer for her website Johnny2X2X Jul 2019 #31

"I could care less about her website, why do you?" jberryhill Jul 2019 #33

Drop the legalese and give your opinion. Does the video ring true to you or not? brush Jul 2019 #37

Perhaps we have different ways of figuring out what may or may not be "true" jberryhill Jul 2019 #44

A woman on CNN was just interviewed and related a very similar story... brush Jul 2019 #47

Yeah, so? jberryhill Jul 2019 #50

So where do you stand on it? Every thing is a hoax or should the video... brush Jul 2019 #51

Quite obviously federal investigators in New York have done a significant amount of investigation jberryhill Jul 2019 #56

Jeesus. Forget about it then. But if they're investigating why not her story and find out... brush Jul 2019 #59

"But if they're investigating why not her story..." jberryhill Jul 2019 #60

If it's been investigated and found to be a hoax, so be it... brush Jul 2019 #74

It's not "very similar" at all jberryhill Jul 2019 #75

No need to discuss it anymore. Your mind is made up. brush Jul 2019 #78

Yes it is jberryhill Jul 2019 #80

Agreed. When she didn't have a real address in California, I stopped treating this as a real case MaryMagdaline Jul 2019 #52

Could be a hoax, could be real. Worth investigating though since the... brush Jul 2019 #57

There was one DUer... jberryhill Jul 2019 #68

Sorry she doesn't fit your definition of a perfect victim Johnny2X2X Jul 2019 #38

" Did she not use her full name in the NY case? " jberryhill Jul 2019 #40

Her accusation remains Johnny2X2X Jul 2019 #42

No, she's not named Katie Johnson jberryhill Jul 2019 #48

So she wanted to keep some anonymity Johnny2X2X Jul 2019 #55

I'm not sure you can follow a logical argument jberryhill Jul 2019 #58

Tape is still stunning and deserves attention Johnny2X2X Jul 2019 #65

"I don't care if she dropped off the face of the earth" jberryhill Jul 2019 #67

Double Post Johnny2X2X Jul 2019 #39

You unsupported skepticism of particular demographics LanternWaste Jul 2019 #41

It's from before the election Chalco Jul 2019 #11

EVERYONE NEEDS to see this!!! Johnny2X2X Jul 2019 #5

The Democrats need to use this to oust not only Acosta duforsure Jul 2019 #6

The mention of a glove about the 1.40 mark is really telling. So is the enabler remark about "nobody BSdetect Jul 2019 #9

will watch bdamomma Jul 2019 #10

Trumper the Child Humper ElementaryPenguin Jul 2019 #13

This should stick, keyword: SHOULD Brainfodder Jul 2019 #19

KR NT ProudProgressiveNow Jul 2019 #15

Didn't watch or read but... jmbar2 Jul 2019 #17

"It is a well-documented technique from Russia to mix truth with lies" jberryhill Jul 2019 #23

it's creative to imply oppression by those who don't hold your opinions. LanternWaste Jul 2019 #43

Thank you for this one and your posts above Jberryhill. Amimnoch Jul 2019 #49

No. She's credible - and this was out before, but taken down later. ElementaryPenguin Jul 2019 #25

I'm not disputing whether true or not... jmbar2 Jul 2019 #36

And, significantly, this "Katie Johnson" has nothing to do with the Epstein case jberryhill Jul 2019 #54

It doesn't invalidate her claim... jmbar2 Jul 2019 #61

"She could have been recruited at 13, but not raped until 14" jberryhill Jul 2019 #62

She's very credible. This needs to be widely distributed some way. brush Jul 2019 #18

What was wrong with the wide distribution it got in 2016? jberryhill Jul 2019 #22

Enablers are protecting trump at every turn, making sure things get... brush Jul 2019 #27

You think Cohen was involved in burying this? jberryhill Jul 2019 #28

I just used Cohen as an example of one of his enablers, which he undoubtedly was... brush Jul 2019 #29

The story "came out" and got considerable coverage in 2016 jberryhill Jul 2019 #35

According to the Washington Post, Cohen didn't meet Trump until the late 90s. cureautismnow Jul 2019 #64

"Cohen wouldn't have even known of this event when and if it transpired." jberryhill Jul 2019 #66

She claims to have been raped at the same 13-year-old age as Ivanka, which was around 1994. cureautismnow Jul 2019 #69

"threat on "Katie" WAS effective at keeping her quiet henceforth." jberryhill Jul 2019 #70

Do you think the lawyer who filed the lawsuit is bogus, too? cureautismnow Jul 2019 #71

Do you know that he never met her? jberryhill Jul 2019 #72

How do you know he never met her? cureautismnow Jul 2019 #76

"Roger Stone thinks "Katie's" story is a hoax. How does it feel to agree with him?" jberryhill Jul 2019 #79

"Perhaps you allow Roger Stone to decide what your opinions should be, but I don't." cureautismnow Jul 2019 #81

Maybe I wasn't clear jberryhill Jul 2019 #82

"Do you think the people who have threatened to kill her in order to shut her up ..." cureautismnow Jul 2019 #83

Well, like I said jberryhill Jul 2019 #84

Congratulations for doing your job 7 years ago! cureautismnow Jul 2019 #86

Well, unlike the KJ site... jberryhill Jul 2019 #87

Touche. I hope you get to take down the tyrant in another future proceeding. cureautismnow Jul 2019 #88

Once in a while something fun comes along jberryhill Jul 2019 #89

By the way, can I ask you an unrelated question? jberryhill Jul 2019 #73

Hopeful. cureautismnow Jul 2019 #77

The woman being threatened is also supported by other incidents detailed in the last few years. mackdaddy Jul 2019 #34

Trump supporters won't care. Lonestarblue Jul 2019 #26

This. Their barbaric and misogynistic view of "why God put calimary Jul 2019 #46

dems should invite her to testify in congress AlexSFCA Jul 2019 #20

I find this much more credible now than when it was released before the election. mackdaddy Jul 2019 #24

I remember her second law suit, watoos Jul 2019 #30

Heaven forbid! Might this cost Trumpy at least a fraction of his evangelical support? ElementaryPenguin Jul 2019 #32

It would increase it Johnny2X2X Jul 2019 #45

That was tough to listen to. infullview Jul 2019 #53

Same thoughts here. Duppers Jul 2019 #90

Wow, he liked her because she looked like his daughter who was also 13 at the time. redstatebluegirl Jul 2019 #63

Direct link between Epstein and Drumpf cp Jul 2019 #85

The video link is gone Sugarcoated Dec 2019 #91