So, No Oscar for Mueller? By Connie Schultz [View all]

[babylonsister]

https://www.creators.com/read/connie-schultz?fbclid=IwAR0Tcz2ZyinWWNASJlE0NlZcuZ51UzQN8VuVXM-9MVrsM9Hz1GST7DgWsPo


So, No Oscar for Mueller?
By Connie Schultz
July 25, 2019 6 min read


Minutes after Robert Mueller III had completed his first round of Wednesday's congressional testimony, journalists and pundits started weighing in — on his acting abilities.

Mueller was "boring" and "phlegmatic."

His performance was "a disaster," "painful" and "deeply unsatisfying."

Some compared his testimony to the bombastic pathology of Donald Trump — and even the conversational theatrics of former FBI Director James Comey — and found him wanting.

Mueller had expressed not one partisan viewpoint. He refused to be political. He even stumbled at times, failing to remember every reference in the 448 pages of his published report.

In this time of crisis in our country, with the most dangerous president in the United States history, they wanted former special counsel Robert Mueller to be entertaining.

Look at what we've become.

Better yet, look at what Mueller did say during his seven hours of testimony.

Let's start with the Judiciary Committee, and Democratic Rep. Jerry Nadler's questioning:

snip//

If any word of this strikes us as boring, we have our own question to answer: When did we give up on America?