Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(102,225 posts)

1. Every legal scholar I've seen discuss this has said this is an impeachment inquiry and those

Tue Jul 30, 2019, 05:16 PM

Jul 2019

who nitpick on the semantics are citing a distinction without a difference, at least legally. And, I've read comments from at least a dozen by now.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Michelle Goldberg just made an excellent point about impeachment inquiries [View all] StarfishSaver Jul 2019 OP

I agree StarfishSaver Jul 2019 #2

Nadler made the same points when he was on DeminPennswoods Jul 2019 #3

I don't know StarfishSaver Jul 2019 #6

Because Most People SimplyCan't Or Refuse To Understand Nuance Me. Jul 2019 #7

This isn't even nuance StarfishSaver Jul 2019 #8

Or maybe... melman Jul 2019 #9

Nadler and the Judiciary Committee Members say it's happening StarfishSaver Jul 2019 #10

Eliot Engle melman Jul 2019 #11

Yes, that could be it. StarfishSaver Jul 2019 #13

Right melman Jul 2019 #15

Funny, isn't it? (nt) ehrnst Jul 2019 #19

Actually the pleading goes even further than that StarfishSaver Jul 2019 #14

+1. nt pnwmom Jul 2019 #16

K&R, uponit7771 Jul 2019 #18