Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Disaffected

(4,554 posts)

7. I don't believe

Reply to Mike 03 (Reply #5)

Tue Jul 30, 2019, 07:01 PM

Jul 2019

your opinion is strange at all, in fact, such a scenario makes a good deal of sense. Concluding the investigations b/f the election has not nearly as much advantage. I'd bet that has been Pelosi's plan since the outset.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

People keep saying if impeachment doesn't start by Labor Day, end of the year, etc., it's dead [View all] StarfishSaver Jul 2019 OP

Doesn't mean anything, elleng Jul 2019 #1

Maybe the hearings and investigations would take on a sense of urgency Mike 03 Jul 2019 #2

What do you mean by "sense of urgency"? StarfishSaver Jul 2019 #3

Multiple investigations going on at the same time - may confuse trump empedocles Jul 2019 #4

Yes, and hopefully totally overwhelm his legal staff. Mike 03 Jul 2019 #6

Yes, the committees will be able to access information that the administration Mike 03 Jul 2019 #5

I don't believe Disaffected Jul 2019 #7

And to "determine whether to recommend trump to be impeached". Will Nadler Laura PourMeADrink Aug 2019 #9

It means FORMALLY starting the impeachment process. Laura PourMeADrink Aug 2019 #8