Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

IronLionZion

(45,380 posts)
10. Before the crime. Cops claim he may have disguised it with makeup
Mon Aug 19, 2019, 12:21 PM
Aug 2019

and it sounds like they don't have enough other evidence and depend on the fact that he looks like the perp but with tattoos.

Not the only mug shot digitally altered by Portland police dalton99a Aug 2019 #1
As more and more of these kind of stories come out Proud Liberal Dem Aug 2019 #9
Damn, so the forensic criminalist might have blown up a ton of other cases and convictions or just uponit7771 Aug 2019 #30
Right. Racism and laziness is not a good combination for a police officer. brush Aug 2019 #2
Um...wow. Downtown Hound Aug 2019 #3
how is this any different than planting evidence? Takket Aug 2019 #4
Evidence tampering of any sort is a pretty serious crime... Wounded Bear Aug 2019 #11
"should" is the key word IronLionZion Aug 2019 #24
When did he get the tatoos? Sanity Claws Aug 2019 #5
It is almost beside the point. Voltaire2 Aug 2019 #8
Before the crime. Cops claim he may have disguised it with makeup IronLionZion Aug 2019 #10
The make up cover up was my first thought. littlemissmartypants Aug 2019 #28
If the police claim to do this "all the time" Proud Liberal Dem Aug 2019 #6
it feeds imprisonment for profit Hermit-The-Prog Aug 2019 #25
Which is also, obv a bad thing Proud Liberal Dem Aug 2019 #26
K&R This is worse than a DWB (Driving While Black) violation... real Cannabis calm Aug 2019 #7
K&R... spanone Aug 2019 #12
Wouldn't a mugshot be a public record? How would the intentional alteration avebury Aug 2019 #13
Courts have ruled that police are allowed to lie. Caliman73 Aug 2019 #20
Just thought of this Proud Liberal Dem Aug 2019 #27
I thought they were allowed to lie to suspects not witness's about suspects? uponit7771 Aug 2019 #31
Police are legally allowed to lie at any point except when under oath. Progressive Law Aug 2019 #34
Creating circumstantial evidence bucolic_frolic Aug 2019 #14
Meanwhile, the real robber goes free! N/t TexasBushwhacker Aug 2019 #15
Why is this not a no-brained? Get the lead out Judge. Auggie Aug 2019 #16
Unless the witnesses personally or professionally know the criminal, Ilsa Aug 2019 #17
What's that saying? SCVDem Aug 2019 #18
If they could prove the tatoos were new then I would have no problem with this but if they cannot cstanleytech Aug 2019 #19
The tattoos are before the crime. Police think he disguised it with makeup IronLionZion Aug 2019 #21
Well they need to prove that then otherwise it probably needs to be tossed unless they have cstanleytech Aug 2019 #22
I sat on a jury somewhat similar to this case. displacedtexan Aug 2019 #23
changing appearance to match the testimony of a witness Skittles Aug 2019 #29
If I was a bank robber and had facial tattoos I would cover them with make up Generic Brad Aug 2019 #32
It's in the article IronLionZion Aug 2019 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Witnesses said a bank rob...»Reply #10