Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

uponit7771

(90,301 posts)
30. Damn, so the forensic criminalist might have blown up a ton of other cases and convictions or just
Mon Aug 19, 2019, 08:38 PM
Aug 2019

... let people free.

this is so stupid of them

Not the only mug shot digitally altered by Portland police dalton99a Aug 2019 #1
As more and more of these kind of stories come out Proud Liberal Dem Aug 2019 #9
Damn, so the forensic criminalist might have blown up a ton of other cases and convictions or just uponit7771 Aug 2019 #30
Right. Racism and laziness is not a good combination for a police officer. brush Aug 2019 #2
Um...wow. Downtown Hound Aug 2019 #3
how is this any different than planting evidence? Takket Aug 2019 #4
Evidence tampering of any sort is a pretty serious crime... Wounded Bear Aug 2019 #11
"should" is the key word IronLionZion Aug 2019 #24
When did he get the tatoos? Sanity Claws Aug 2019 #5
It is almost beside the point. Voltaire2 Aug 2019 #8
Before the crime. Cops claim he may have disguised it with makeup IronLionZion Aug 2019 #10
The make up cover up was my first thought. littlemissmartypants Aug 2019 #28
If the police claim to do this "all the time" Proud Liberal Dem Aug 2019 #6
it feeds imprisonment for profit Hermit-The-Prog Aug 2019 #25
Which is also, obv a bad thing Proud Liberal Dem Aug 2019 #26
K&R This is worse than a DWB (Driving While Black) violation... real Cannabis calm Aug 2019 #7
K&R... spanone Aug 2019 #12
Wouldn't a mugshot be a public record? How would the intentional alteration avebury Aug 2019 #13
Courts have ruled that police are allowed to lie. Caliman73 Aug 2019 #20
Just thought of this Proud Liberal Dem Aug 2019 #27
I thought they were allowed to lie to suspects not witness's about suspects? uponit7771 Aug 2019 #31
Police are legally allowed to lie at any point except when under oath. Progressive Law Aug 2019 #34
Creating circumstantial evidence bucolic_frolic Aug 2019 #14
Meanwhile, the real robber goes free! N/t TexasBushwhacker Aug 2019 #15
Why is this not a no-brained? Get the lead out Judge. Auggie Aug 2019 #16
Unless the witnesses personally or professionally know the criminal, Ilsa Aug 2019 #17
What's that saying? SCVDem Aug 2019 #18
If they could prove the tatoos were new then I would have no problem with this but if they cannot cstanleytech Aug 2019 #19
The tattoos are before the crime. Police think he disguised it with makeup IronLionZion Aug 2019 #21
Well they need to prove that then otherwise it probably needs to be tossed unless they have cstanleytech Aug 2019 #22
I sat on a jury somewhat similar to this case. displacedtexan Aug 2019 #23
changing appearance to match the testimony of a witness Skittles Aug 2019 #29
If I was a bank robber and had facial tattoos I would cover them with make up Generic Brad Aug 2019 #32
It's in the article IronLionZion Aug 2019 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Witnesses said a bank rob...»Reply #30